对边沁关于司法程序中证据可采性的观点的历史-教条解读

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4067/s0716-54552022000100879

Álvaro Pérez Ragone, R. Cavani

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Lectura histórico-dogmática de la visión de Bentham sobre la admisibilidad de la prueba en el proceso judicial

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos Arts and Humanities-History

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos (abbreviation REHJ, for Historical-Legal Studies Journal) is to spread original and unpublished articles regarding dogmatic, legislative and institutional history in the fields of Roman Law and Legal History, especially in the European and Ibero-American Romanistic tradition; and of History of Western legal and political thought; even if these are lectures given at scientific congresses. It also accepts revisions regarding the status of an issue and broad bibliographic revisions, as long as they are of a critical nature. The Journal does not publish works of a purely philosophical, theoretical, political or sociological content; neither publishes works of a mere outreach nature, whether they consist in non-reprocessed lectures or conferences as articles, nor if they offer the assay form ("reflections", "remarks", "considerations", "note-taking", "notes" etc.). General Coverage on the Following Topics: Roman law, History of (public and private) Law, History of canon law, History of European law, Indian Law (History of the legal system applied in the Americas during the Spanish colonisation), History of the Ibero-American national laws, History of Chilean law, History of the legal dogmas, History of the legal thought, History of the political thought, History of institutions.