哥伦比亚宪政对有情众生的保护与自然的法律个性化贡献

Q3 Social Sciences
Juan Pablo Sarmiento E.
{"title":"哥伦比亚宪政对有情众生的保护与自然的法律个性化贡献","authors":"Juan Pablo Sarmiento E.","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002020000200221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, various legal experiences have identified and enriched the protection of animals by recognizing them as sentient beings, and of nature, subjecting fundamental rights in it. However, in this article it is argued that, despite the relevance of the legal protection of nature, biodiversity and living beings, it is not really an extension of the charter of constitutional rights to those who have no voice; It is a repeated legal position around ecological protection, which seems to have been operated in different countries, with dissimilar legal categories, but identical functions, and in fact, embody structural sentences with complex orders of protection. Likewise, it is argued that the protection of sentient beings and ecosystems is still a legal problem without an autonomous solution, control in all cases, of the bond of the fundamental rights of human beings.","PeriodicalId":39109,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Constitucionales","volume":"18 1","pages":"221-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La protección a los seres sintientes y la personalización jurídica de la naturaleza aportes desde el constitucionalismo colombiano\",\"authors\":\"Juan Pablo Sarmiento E.\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-52002020000200221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, various legal experiences have identified and enriched the protection of animals by recognizing them as sentient beings, and of nature, subjecting fundamental rights in it. However, in this article it is argued that, despite the relevance of the legal protection of nature, biodiversity and living beings, it is not really an extension of the charter of constitutional rights to those who have no voice; It is a repeated legal position around ecological protection, which seems to have been operated in different countries, with dissimilar legal categories, but identical functions, and in fact, embody structural sentences with complex orders of protection. Likewise, it is argued that the protection of sentient beings and ecosystems is still a legal problem without an autonomous solution, control in all cases, of the bond of the fundamental rights of human beings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios Constitucionales\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"221-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios Constitucionales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002020000200221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Constitucionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002020000200221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,各种法律经验明确并丰富了对动物的保护,将动物视为有情之物、自然之物,赋予其基本权利。然而,本文认为,尽管对自然、生物多样性和生物的法律保护具有相关性,但它并不是真正将宪法权利宪章扩展到那些没有发言权的人;它是围绕生态保护的一种重复的法律立场,在不同的国家似乎运作过,法律范畴不同,功能相同,实际上体现的是结构句,保护秩序复杂。同样,有人认为,保护有知觉的生物和生态系统仍然是一个法律问题,没有一个自主的解决方案,在所有情况下,人类基本权利的纽带控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La protección a los seres sintientes y la personalización jurídica de la naturaleza aportes desde el constitucionalismo colombiano
In recent years, various legal experiences have identified and enriched the protection of animals by recognizing them as sentient beings, and of nature, subjecting fundamental rights in it. However, in this article it is argued that, despite the relevance of the legal protection of nature, biodiversity and living beings, it is not really an extension of the charter of constitutional rights to those who have no voice; It is a repeated legal position around ecological protection, which seems to have been operated in different countries, with dissimilar legal categories, but identical functions, and in fact, embody structural sentences with complex orders of protection. Likewise, it is argued that the protection of sentient beings and ecosystems is still a legal problem without an autonomous solution, control in all cases, of the bond of the fundamental rights of human beings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estudios Constitucionales
Estudios Constitucionales Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信