美学与革命:对俄苏先锋派的政治思考(1911-1936)

IF 0.2 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Juan José Gómez-Gutiérrez, Esteban Anchústegui-Igartua
{"title":"美学与革命:对俄苏先锋派的政治思考(1911-1936)","authors":"Juan José Gómez-Gutiérrez, Esteban Anchústegui-Igartua","doi":"10.4067/s0718-50492022000100206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When examining the relationship between art and the Russian Revolution, it has been commonly established a historical divide between early (pre-revolutionary) avant-garde practices and the propagandistic élan of the new State, which eventually liquidated Modern art in the USSR. This article qualifies this view by examining the development of the RussianSoviet avant-garde from the perspective of conflicting interpretations of \"revolutionary art.\" It concludes that, together with the subordination of art to politics, there persisted in the USSR marginal practices which, highlighting the autonomy of aesthetics, assigned political effects to avant-garde criticism of artistic representation.","PeriodicalId":44697,"journal":{"name":"Izquierdas","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estética y revolución: consideraciones políticas sobre las vanguardias ruso-soviéticas (1911-1936)\",\"authors\":\"Juan José Gómez-Gutiérrez, Esteban Anchústegui-Igartua\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-50492022000100206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When examining the relationship between art and the Russian Revolution, it has been commonly established a historical divide between early (pre-revolutionary) avant-garde practices and the propagandistic élan of the new State, which eventually liquidated Modern art in the USSR. This article qualifies this view by examining the development of the RussianSoviet avant-garde from the perspective of conflicting interpretations of \\\"revolutionary art.\\\" It concludes that, together with the subordination of art to politics, there persisted in the USSR marginal practices which, highlighting the autonomy of aesthetics, assigned political effects to avant-garde criticism of artistic representation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Izquierdas\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Izquierdas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50492022000100206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izquierdas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50492022000100206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在研究艺术与俄国革命之间的关系时,人们通常在早期(革命前)前卫艺术实践与新国家的宣传主义主义之间建立了一条历史鸿沟,新国家最终消灭了苏联的现代艺术。本文通过从对“革命艺术”的相互矛盾的解释的角度来考察俄苏先锋派的发展,从而证明了这一观点。它的结论是,连同艺术对政治的从属关系,在苏联的边缘实践中持续存在,这些实践强调美学的自主性,将政治影响分配给艺术表现的先锋派批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estética y revolución: consideraciones políticas sobre las vanguardias ruso-soviéticas (1911-1936)
When examining the relationship between art and the Russian Revolution, it has been commonly established a historical divide between early (pre-revolutionary) avant-garde practices and the propagandistic élan of the new State, which eventually liquidated Modern art in the USSR. This article qualifies this view by examining the development of the RussianSoviet avant-garde from the perspective of conflicting interpretations of "revolutionary art." It concludes that, together with the subordination of art to politics, there persisted in the USSR marginal practices which, highlighting the autonomy of aesthetics, assigned political effects to avant-garde criticism of artistic representation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Izquierdas
Izquierdas POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信