政府应该补贴农业保险吗

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
G. Regos
{"title":"政府应该补贴农业保险吗","authors":"G. Regos","doi":"10.3790/AEQ.61.1.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to investigate the macroeconomic effects of state subsidies for agricultural insurance. From the policy’s point of view, the issue is important as this subsidy is a common and widely applied practice in many countries, though it does not exist in others; so the welfare effects of the subsidy need to be investigated—which investigation is the main contribution of the paper. A possible reason for this subsidy’s existence might be that agricultural insurances by themselves attain only a low penetration rate due to several factors, for example low-risk sensitivity, high premiums, and governments’ ad hoc subsidy policies. Thus, an enabling of risk management is an advantage of the subsidy. According to our results, agricultural insurance subsidizing does not have any significant welfare effect for the user and does not influence the economy’s output significantly; however, it is beneficial for agricultural producers, so one might wish to recommend such a policy if seeking to promote agriculture.","PeriodicalId":36978,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economics Quarterly","volume":"61 1","pages":"65-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should Governments Subsidize Agricultural Insurances\",\"authors\":\"G. Regos\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/AEQ.61.1.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to investigate the macroeconomic effects of state subsidies for agricultural insurance. From the policy’s point of view, the issue is important as this subsidy is a common and widely applied practice in many countries, though it does not exist in others; so the welfare effects of the subsidy need to be investigated—which investigation is the main contribution of the paper. A possible reason for this subsidy’s existence might be that agricultural insurances by themselves attain only a low penetration rate due to several factors, for example low-risk sensitivity, high premiums, and governments’ ad hoc subsidy policies. Thus, an enabling of risk management is an advantage of the subsidy. According to our results, agricultural insurance subsidizing does not have any significant welfare effect for the user and does not influence the economy’s output significantly; however, it is beneficial for agricultural producers, so one might wish to recommend such a policy if seeking to promote agriculture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Economics Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"65-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Economics Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.61.1.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.61.1.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨国家补贴农业保险的宏观经济效应。从政策的角度来看,这个问题很重要,因为这种补贴在许多国家是一种普遍和广泛应用的做法,尽管在其他国家并不存在;因此,需要对补贴的福利效应进行调查,这一调查是本文的主要贡献。这种补贴存在的一个可能原因是,农业保险本身由于风险敏感性低、保费高、政府特别补贴政策等因素,只能实现较低的渗透率。因此,使风险管理成为可能是补贴的一个优势。研究结果表明,农业保险补贴对使用者没有显著的福利效应,对经济产出也没有显著影响;然而,这对农业生产者是有益的,所以如果寻求促进农业,人们可能希望推荐这样的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should Governments Subsidize Agricultural Insurances
The aim of this study is to investigate the macroeconomic effects of state subsidies for agricultural insurance. From the policy’s point of view, the issue is important as this subsidy is a common and widely applied practice in many countries, though it does not exist in others; so the welfare effects of the subsidy need to be investigated—which investigation is the main contribution of the paper. A possible reason for this subsidy’s existence might be that agricultural insurances by themselves attain only a low penetration rate due to several factors, for example low-risk sensitivity, high premiums, and governments’ ad hoc subsidy policies. Thus, an enabling of risk management is an advantage of the subsidy. According to our results, agricultural insurance subsidizing does not have any significant welfare effect for the user and does not influence the economy’s output significantly; however, it is beneficial for agricultural producers, so one might wish to recommend such a policy if seeking to promote agriculture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economics Quarterly
Applied Economics Quarterly Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信