脑卒中后残疾状况评估工具

Q4 Medicine
Claudia-Gabriela Potcovaru, T. Salmen, Marius-Costin Chitu, Vlad Dima, Margareta Bianca Mihai, R. Bohîlțea, D. Cinteză, M. Berteanu
{"title":"脑卒中后残疾状况评估工具","authors":"Claudia-Gabriela Potcovaru, T. Salmen, Marius-Costin Chitu, Vlad Dima, Margareta Bianca Mihai, R. Bohîlțea, D. Cinteză, M. Berteanu","doi":"10.37897/rjn.2022.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide. The global incidence of stroke has increased in recent years, although low and middle-income countries have been heavily affected. Because of the complicated and diversified physical and emotional disruption, stroke survivors are likely to face a variety of difficulties in daily life activities. Because of the wide impact of a stroke on all body structures and functions, there is no gold standard instrument to evaluate impairment and all elements of recovery after a stroke, and there is no single scale that can capture all the effects of a stroke. The International Classification of Impairments, Disability, and Handicaps (ICIDH) categorized the consequences of the diseases into three categories: impairment, disability, and handicap. Using the biopsychosocial model in 2001 WHO defines and classifies disability by using International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF). The ICF divides the impairment into three categories: body function and structure, activity, and participation. This article aims to review the most important tools that are reliable and valid in assessing the disability left after a stroke: The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel index (BI), The modified Rankin scale (mRS), Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). The WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire is validated in several countries and it would be useful to be validated, also, in our country.","PeriodicalId":37662,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Neurology/ Revista Romana de Neurologie","volume":"59 26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment tools of disability status after stroke\",\"authors\":\"Claudia-Gabriela Potcovaru, T. Salmen, Marius-Costin Chitu, Vlad Dima, Margareta Bianca Mihai, R. Bohîlțea, D. Cinteză, M. Berteanu\",\"doi\":\"10.37897/rjn.2022.3.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide. The global incidence of stroke has increased in recent years, although low and middle-income countries have been heavily affected. Because of the complicated and diversified physical and emotional disruption, stroke survivors are likely to face a variety of difficulties in daily life activities. Because of the wide impact of a stroke on all body structures and functions, there is no gold standard instrument to evaluate impairment and all elements of recovery after a stroke, and there is no single scale that can capture all the effects of a stroke. The International Classification of Impairments, Disability, and Handicaps (ICIDH) categorized the consequences of the diseases into three categories: impairment, disability, and handicap. Using the biopsychosocial model in 2001 WHO defines and classifies disability by using International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF). The ICF divides the impairment into three categories: body function and structure, activity, and participation. This article aims to review the most important tools that are reliable and valid in assessing the disability left after a stroke: The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel index (BI), The modified Rankin scale (mRS), Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). The WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire is validated in several countries and it would be useful to be validated, also, in our country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian Journal of Neurology/ Revista Romana de Neurologie\",\"volume\":\"59 26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian Journal of Neurology/ Revista Romana de Neurologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjn.2022.3.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Neurology/ Revista Romana de Neurologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjn.2022.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

中风是全球第二大死因。近年来,尽管低收入和中等收入国家受到严重影响,但全球卒中发病率有所增加。由于中风患者的身体和情绪受到复杂多样的破坏,他们在日常生活活动中可能面临各种各样的困难。由于中风对所有身体结构和功能的广泛影响,没有黄金标准的工具来评估中风后的损伤和恢复的所有要素,也没有单一的尺度可以捕捉中风的所有影响。国际缺陷、残疾和残障分类(ICIDH)将这些疾病的后果分为三类:损伤、残疾和残障。2001年,世卫组织使用生物心理社会模型,使用国际功能残疾和健康分类(ICF)对残疾进行定义和分类。ICF将损伤分为三类:身体功能和结构、活动和参与。本文旨在回顾评估中风后遗留残疾的最重要的可靠和有效的工具:美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS), Barthel指数(BI),改良Rankin量表(mRS),日常生活工具活动(IADL),格拉斯哥结果量表(GOS),功能独立性量表(FIM),世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS 2.0)。WHODAS 2.0问卷已在若干国家得到验证,在我国也得到验证将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment tools of disability status after stroke
Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide. The global incidence of stroke has increased in recent years, although low and middle-income countries have been heavily affected. Because of the complicated and diversified physical and emotional disruption, stroke survivors are likely to face a variety of difficulties in daily life activities. Because of the wide impact of a stroke on all body structures and functions, there is no gold standard instrument to evaluate impairment and all elements of recovery after a stroke, and there is no single scale that can capture all the effects of a stroke. The International Classification of Impairments, Disability, and Handicaps (ICIDH) categorized the consequences of the diseases into three categories: impairment, disability, and handicap. Using the biopsychosocial model in 2001 WHO defines and classifies disability by using International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF). The ICF divides the impairment into three categories: body function and structure, activity, and participation. This article aims to review the most important tools that are reliable and valid in assessing the disability left after a stroke: The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel index (BI), The modified Rankin scale (mRS), Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). The WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire is validated in several countries and it would be useful to be validated, also, in our country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY (Revista Română de Neurologie), the official journal of the Romanian Society of Neurology, was founded in 2001, being a prestigious scientific journal that provides a high quality in terms of scientific content, but also the editorial and graphic aspect, both through an impartial process of selection, evaluation and correction of articles (peer review procedure), as well as providing editorial, graphic and printing conditions at the highest level. In order to increase the scientific standards of the journal, special attention was paid to the improvement of the quality of the published materials. Guidance articles, clinical trials and case studies are structured in several sections: reviews, original articles, case reports, images in neurology. All articles are published entirely in English. A team of reputable medical professionals in the field of neurology is involved in a rigorous peer review process that complies with international ethics and quality rules in the academic world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信