亚里士多德的三段论重述

G. Auletta
{"title":"亚里士多德的三段论重述","authors":"G. Auletta","doi":"10.3280/EPIS2013-002004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, following Peirce’s examination of the problem, I shall treat Aristotle’s syllogistics according to the rules of modern logic. In particular I shall show that two syllogisms (Darapti and Felapton) are not acceptable according to these principles. Finally, I shall show some very general properties of syllogistics that could be very helpful for building a general theory of inferences. In questo lavoro mi rifaro all’esame che Peirce ha svolto della sillogistica aristotelica e la inquadrero negli sviluppi logici contemporanei. In particolare, mostrero che due sillogismi (Darapti and Felapton) non sono in accordo con i principi logici oggi riconosciuti. Infine mostrero alcune caratteristiche generali della sillogistica che potrebbero risultare molto utili per costruire una teoria generale delle inferenze.","PeriodicalId":50506,"journal":{"name":"Epistemologia","volume":"1 1","pages":"233-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aristotle’s Syllogistics revisited\",\"authors\":\"G. Auletta\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/EPIS2013-002004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, following Peirce’s examination of the problem, I shall treat Aristotle’s syllogistics according to the rules of modern logic. In particular I shall show that two syllogisms (Darapti and Felapton) are not acceptable according to these principles. Finally, I shall show some very general properties of syllogistics that could be very helpful for building a general theory of inferences. In questo lavoro mi rifaro all’esame che Peirce ha svolto della sillogistica aristotelica e la inquadrero negli sviluppi logici contemporanei. In particolare, mostrero che due sillogismi (Darapti and Felapton) non sono in accordo con i principi logici oggi riconosciuti. Infine mostrero alcune caratteristiche generali della sillogistica che potrebbero risultare molto utili per costruire una teoria generale delle inferenze.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epistemologia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"233-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epistemologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/EPIS2013-002004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epistemologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/EPIS2013-002004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这份文件中,佩尔塞对问题的分析,我将按照现代逻辑的规则来对待亚里士多德的syllogistics。最重要的是,我要表明,对这些原则的两项协议是不能接受的。最后,我将展示一些非常普遍的syllogistics的特性,这将有助于建立一个普遍的疾病理论。在这项工作中,我将回顾佩尔斯对亚里士多德的研究,并将其与当代的逻辑发展联系起来。我将特别指出两个音节(Darapti和Felapton)不符合今天公认的逻辑原则。最后,我将展示梅毒的一些一般特征,这些特征可能对建立一个一般的推理理论非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aristotle’s Syllogistics revisited
In this paper, following Peirce’s examination of the problem, I shall treat Aristotle’s syllogistics according to the rules of modern logic. In particular I shall show that two syllogisms (Darapti and Felapton) are not acceptable according to these principles. Finally, I shall show some very general properties of syllogistics that could be very helpful for building a general theory of inferences. In questo lavoro mi rifaro all’esame che Peirce ha svolto della sillogistica aristotelica e la inquadrero negli sviluppi logici contemporanei. In particolare, mostrero che due sillogismi (Darapti and Felapton) non sono in accordo con i principi logici oggi riconosciuti. Infine mostrero alcune caratteristiche generali della sillogistica che potrebbero risultare molto utili per costruire una teoria generale delle inferenze.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epistemologia
Epistemologia 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信