开垦街道?大流行后公共空间的可能性

IF 1.6 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
A. Thorpe
{"title":"开垦街道?大流行后公共空间的可能性","authors":"A. Thorpe","doi":"10.3828/tpr.2020.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public streets are the quintessential site of politics: not just marches and assemblies where rights are demanded and disrupted, but the everyday expression of collective decisions about how we live together, about who gets access to which space and for what purposes, about the role of the state and the rights and responsibilities of citizens Those collective decisions are often highly contested, so that the relative rights and responsibilities of citizens and their cities remain the subject of ongoing negotiation The rules that regulate streets are always uneven The ways those rules are interpreted--and sometimes amended--are influenced to a significant degree by popular understandings about the kinds of use (and users) that are and are not legitimate in public space Those understandings, and in turn behaviors and rules, can shift","PeriodicalId":47547,"journal":{"name":"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW","volume":"92 1","pages":"75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reclaiming the streets? Possibilities for post-pandemic public space\",\"authors\":\"A. Thorpe\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/tpr.2020.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public streets are the quintessential site of politics: not just marches and assemblies where rights are demanded and disrupted, but the everyday expression of collective decisions about how we live together, about who gets access to which space and for what purposes, about the role of the state and the rights and responsibilities of citizens Those collective decisions are often highly contested, so that the relative rights and responsibilities of citizens and their cities remain the subject of ongoing negotiation The rules that regulate streets are always uneven The ways those rules are interpreted--and sometimes amended--are influenced to a significant degree by popular understandings about the kinds of use (and users) that are and are not legitimate in public space Those understandings, and in turn behaviors and rules, can shift\",\"PeriodicalId\":47547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"75-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TOWN PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

公共街道是典型的政治场所:不仅仅是要求和破坏权利的游行和集会,而是集体决定的日常表达,关于我们如何共同生活,关于谁可以进入哪个空间以及出于什么目的,关于国家的角色以及公民的权利和责任,这些集体决定经常受到高度争议,因此,公民及其城市的相对权利和责任仍然是持续谈判的主题。管理街道的规则总是不平衡的,对这些规则的解释——有时是修改——的方式在很大程度上受到公众对公共空间中哪些用途(和使用者)合法或不合法的理解的影响。这些理解,以及行为和规则,可能会发生变化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reclaiming the streets? Possibilities for post-pandemic public space
Public streets are the quintessential site of politics: not just marches and assemblies where rights are demanded and disrupted, but the everyday expression of collective decisions about how we live together, about who gets access to which space and for what purposes, about the role of the state and the rights and responsibilities of citizens Those collective decisions are often highly contested, so that the relative rights and responsibilities of citizens and their cities remain the subject of ongoing negotiation The rules that regulate streets are always uneven The ways those rules are interpreted--and sometimes amended--are influenced to a significant degree by popular understandings about the kinds of use (and users) that are and are not legitimate in public space Those understandings, and in turn behaviors and rules, can shift
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TOWN PLANNING REVIEW
TOWN PLANNING REVIEW URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Town Planning Review has been one of the world"s leading journals of urban and regional planning since its foundation in 1910. With an extensive international readership, TPR is a well established urban and regional planning journal, providing a principal forum for communication between researchers and students, policy analysts and practitioners. To mark TPR’s centenary in 2010, it is proposed to publish a series of ‘Centenary Papers’ -- review papers that record and reflect on the state of the art in a range of topics in the general field of town and regional planning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信