成员国的程序自治以及对等和有效原则

Katalin Holé
{"title":"成员国的程序自治以及对等和有效原则","authors":"Katalin Holé","doi":"10.29327/270098.14.23-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has as its goal to discuss the barriers of national procedural autonomy emerging in the member states of the European Union. I also discuss the legal interpretation activities of the European Court of Justice make on national procedural laws and what national codification measures the enforcement of EU law requires.","PeriodicalId":31433,"journal":{"name":"Revista ESMAT","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY OF THE MEMBER STATES AND THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUIVALENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS\",\"authors\":\"Katalin Holé\",\"doi\":\"10.29327/270098.14.23-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article has as its goal to discuss the barriers of national procedural autonomy emerging in the member states of the European Union. I also discuss the legal interpretation activities of the European Court of Justice make on national procedural laws and what national codification measures the enforcement of EU law requires.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista ESMAT\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista ESMAT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29327/270098.14.23-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista ESMAT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/270098.14.23-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探讨欧盟成员国中出现的国家程序自治障碍。本文还讨论了欧洲法院对国家程序法的法律解释活动,以及欧盟法律的执行需要哪些国家法典化措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY OF THE MEMBER STATES AND THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUIVALENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS
This article has as its goal to discuss the barriers of national procedural autonomy emerging in the member states of the European Union. I also discuss the legal interpretation activities of the European Court of Justice make on national procedural laws and what national codification measures the enforcement of EU law requires.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信