波罗的海条款的形成。芬兰的倡议

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Antti-Jussi Nygård
{"title":"波罗的海条款的形成。芬兰的倡议","authors":"Antti-Jussi Nygård","doi":"10.3176/hist.2012.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Baltic Clause was a special arrangement in Baltic trade policy during the interwar period. By adding the clause to their trade treaties, the Baltic states aimed to secure the special customs privileges they had granted or would grant to each other. In the long term, at least in the cases of Estonia and Latvia, the aim was to extend this principle towards a customs union. The underlying reasons for such measures were, of course, economic. Just a few years earlier the small countries abutting the eastern shores of the Baltic Sea had been part of the same colossal economy. By creating a system of regional preferences, the newly independent countries were actually trying to simulate and compensate for the old system. Re-aligning the economy was a central part of the transition process that took place during the first years of Baltic independence. The plans also had a political dimension and were connected to Baltic cooperation and later the Baltic Entente. The history of the Baltic Clause has been written mostly from the Estonian and Latvian viewpoints. This is understandable because at the beginning of the 1930s the clause became an official part of Estonian and Latvian foreign trade policies. In my paper I will show that, for Finland, the Baltic Clause was originally not so much a door to a customs union as a means of gaining similar advantages without the political burden of such a union. However, due to the lack of economic connections Finland chose not to use the Baltic Clause in her trade treaties. The paper is mostly based on archival materials from the Estonian National Archives and the archives of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. The author is preparing a doctoral thesis on Finno-Estonian economic relations during the interwar period.","PeriodicalId":40943,"journal":{"name":"Acta Historica Tallinnensia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3176/hist.2012.1.03","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE FORMATION OF THE BALTIC CLAUSE. A FINNISH INITIATIVE\",\"authors\":\"Antti-Jussi Nygård\",\"doi\":\"10.3176/hist.2012.1.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Baltic Clause was a special arrangement in Baltic trade policy during the interwar period. By adding the clause to their trade treaties, the Baltic states aimed to secure the special customs privileges they had granted or would grant to each other. In the long term, at least in the cases of Estonia and Latvia, the aim was to extend this principle towards a customs union. The underlying reasons for such measures were, of course, economic. Just a few years earlier the small countries abutting the eastern shores of the Baltic Sea had been part of the same colossal economy. By creating a system of regional preferences, the newly independent countries were actually trying to simulate and compensate for the old system. Re-aligning the economy was a central part of the transition process that took place during the first years of Baltic independence. The plans also had a political dimension and were connected to Baltic cooperation and later the Baltic Entente. The history of the Baltic Clause has been written mostly from the Estonian and Latvian viewpoints. This is understandable because at the beginning of the 1930s the clause became an official part of Estonian and Latvian foreign trade policies. In my paper I will show that, for Finland, the Baltic Clause was originally not so much a door to a customs union as a means of gaining similar advantages without the political burden of such a union. However, due to the lack of economic connections Finland chose not to use the Baltic Clause in her trade treaties. The paper is mostly based on archival materials from the Estonian National Archives and the archives of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. The author is preparing a doctoral thesis on Finno-Estonian economic relations during the interwar period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Historica Tallinnensia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3176/hist.2012.1.03\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Historica Tallinnensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3176/hist.2012.1.03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Historica Tallinnensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/hist.2012.1.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

波罗的海条款是两次世界大战之间波罗的海贸易政策的一项特殊安排。波罗的海各国在其贸易条约中加入这一条款,目的是确保它们已经给予或将给予彼此的特殊关税特权。从长期来看,至少在爱沙尼亚和拉脱维亚的情况下,目标是将这一原则扩展到关税同盟。当然,采取这些措施的根本原因是经济方面的。就在几年前,这些毗邻波罗的海东岸的小国还是同一个庞大经济体的一部分。新独立的国家通过建立区域优惠制度,实际上是在试图模拟和弥补旧制度。重新调整经济是波罗的海独立的头几年发生的过渡进程的核心部分。这些计划也有政治层面,与波罗的海合作以及后来的波罗的海协约有关。波罗的海条款的历史主要是从爱沙尼亚和拉脱维亚的观点来写的。这是可以理解的,因为在20世纪30年代初,该条款成为爱沙尼亚和拉脱维亚对外贸易政策的正式组成部分。在我的论文中,我将表明,对于芬兰来说,波罗的海条款最初与其说是通往关税同盟的大门,不如说是一种获得类似优势而不承担这种同盟的政治负担的手段。然而,由于缺乏经济联系,芬兰选择在其贸易条约中不使用波罗的海条款。本文主要基于爱沙尼亚国家档案馆和芬兰外交部档案馆的档案资料。作者正在准备一篇关于两次世界大战期间芬兰-爱沙尼亚经济关系的博士论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE FORMATION OF THE BALTIC CLAUSE. A FINNISH INITIATIVE
The Baltic Clause was a special arrangement in Baltic trade policy during the interwar period. By adding the clause to their trade treaties, the Baltic states aimed to secure the special customs privileges they had granted or would grant to each other. In the long term, at least in the cases of Estonia and Latvia, the aim was to extend this principle towards a customs union. The underlying reasons for such measures were, of course, economic. Just a few years earlier the small countries abutting the eastern shores of the Baltic Sea had been part of the same colossal economy. By creating a system of regional preferences, the newly independent countries were actually trying to simulate and compensate for the old system. Re-aligning the economy was a central part of the transition process that took place during the first years of Baltic independence. The plans also had a political dimension and were connected to Baltic cooperation and later the Baltic Entente. The history of the Baltic Clause has been written mostly from the Estonian and Latvian viewpoints. This is understandable because at the beginning of the 1930s the clause became an official part of Estonian and Latvian foreign trade policies. In my paper I will show that, for Finland, the Baltic Clause was originally not so much a door to a customs union as a means of gaining similar advantages without the political burden of such a union. However, due to the lack of economic connections Finland chose not to use the Baltic Clause in her trade treaties. The paper is mostly based on archival materials from the Estonian National Archives and the archives of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. The author is preparing a doctoral thesis on Finno-Estonian economic relations during the interwar period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信