南极洲的伦理与生物勘探

A. Guyomard
{"title":"南极洲的伦理与生物勘探","authors":"A. Guyomard","doi":"10.3354/ESEP00104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bioprospecting is a current activity in Antarctica, especially in the Southern Ocean, where numerous genetic resources have already been extracted and patented. At the global level, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, the Convention on Biologi- cal Diversity and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea are the normal legal instru- ments for bioprospecting. These instruments are all based on territoriality and incorporate govern- ment restriction of access to resources. However, in Antarctica, the Antarctic Treaty System has been built over the past 50 yr on fundamental ethical principles comprising peace, a freeze on territorial claims, freedom of scientific research, international cooperation, and environmental protection in the interest of mankind as a whole. How can bioprospecting be organized in Antarctica to match these ethical concerns without a sovereign governance structure that is predicated in the global instru- ments? At the global level, the current instruments seem inadequate because of the lack of accep- tance of territorial claims existing in Antarctica; at the regional level, the existing system of Antarctic law still lacks concepts and criteria necessary to underpin the development of this activity with respect to the ethical principles and in a form likely to be transferred into national legislation. The solution for bioprospecting in Antarctica therefore needs to be the creation of an ad hoc Antarctic legal regime.","PeriodicalId":40001,"journal":{"name":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","volume":"10 1","pages":"31-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics and bioprospecting in Antarctica\",\"authors\":\"A. Guyomard\",\"doi\":\"10.3354/ESEP00104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bioprospecting is a current activity in Antarctica, especially in the Southern Ocean, where numerous genetic resources have already been extracted and patented. At the global level, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, the Convention on Biologi- cal Diversity and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea are the normal legal instru- ments for bioprospecting. These instruments are all based on territoriality and incorporate govern- ment restriction of access to resources. However, in Antarctica, the Antarctic Treaty System has been built over the past 50 yr on fundamental ethical principles comprising peace, a freeze on territorial claims, freedom of scientific research, international cooperation, and environmental protection in the interest of mankind as a whole. How can bioprospecting be organized in Antarctica to match these ethical concerns without a sovereign governance structure that is predicated in the global instru- ments? At the global level, the current instruments seem inadequate because of the lack of accep- tance of territorial claims existing in Antarctica; at the regional level, the existing system of Antarctic law still lacks concepts and criteria necessary to underpin the development of this activity with respect to the ethical principles and in a form likely to be transferred into national legislation. The solution for bioprospecting in Antarctica therefore needs to be the creation of an ad hoc Antarctic legal regime.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"31-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3354/ESEP00104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/ESEP00104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

生物勘探是目前南极洲的一项活动,特别是在南大洋,那里已经提取了许多遗传资源并获得了专利。在全球一级,《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》、《生物多样性公约》和《联合国海洋法公约》是生物勘探的正常法律文书。这些文书都以领土为基础,并包括政府对获取资源的限制。然而,在南极洲,《南极条约体系》是在过去50年中根据基本伦理原则建立起来的,这些原则包括和平、冻结领土要求、科学研究自由、国际合作以及为了整个人类的利益而保护环境。如果没有全球文书中规定的主权治理结构,如何在南极洲组织生物勘探来匹配这些伦理问题?在全球一级,目前的文书似乎是不够的,因为对南极洲现有的领土要求缺乏接受;在区域一级,现有的南极法律制度仍然缺乏必要的概念和标准,以支持在道德原则方面开展这项活动,并以一种可能转化为国家立法的形式。因此,在南极洲进行生物勘探的解决办法必须是建立一个特别的南极法律制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethics and bioprospecting in Antarctica
Bioprospecting is a current activity in Antarctica, especially in the Southern Ocean, where numerous genetic resources have already been extracted and patented. At the global level, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, the Convention on Biologi- cal Diversity and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea are the normal legal instru- ments for bioprospecting. These instruments are all based on territoriality and incorporate govern- ment restriction of access to resources. However, in Antarctica, the Antarctic Treaty System has been built over the past 50 yr on fundamental ethical principles comprising peace, a freeze on territorial claims, freedom of scientific research, international cooperation, and environmental protection in the interest of mankind as a whole. How can bioprospecting be organized in Antarctica to match these ethical concerns without a sovereign governance structure that is predicated in the global instru- ments? At the global level, the current instruments seem inadequate because of the lack of accep- tance of territorial claims existing in Antarctica; at the regional level, the existing system of Antarctic law still lacks concepts and criteria necessary to underpin the development of this activity with respect to the ethical principles and in a form likely to be transferred into national legislation. The solution for bioprospecting in Antarctica therefore needs to be the creation of an ad hoc Antarctic legal regime.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: •provides a global stage for presenting, discussing and developing issues concerning ethics in science, environmental politics, and ecological and economic ethics •publishes accepted manuscripts rapidly •guarantees immediate world-wide visibility •is edited and produced by an experienced team
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信