沟通板对机械呼吸机患者沟通缓解及焦虑的效果观察

T. Titus, R. Manimozhi, R. Ba
{"title":"沟通板对机械呼吸机患者沟通缓解及焦虑的效果观察","authors":"T. Titus, R. Manimozhi, R. Ba","doi":"10.31690/ijnmi.2022.v07i02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with physical and sensory disabilities, such as deafness, blindness, and patient with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation have been shown to face considerable barriers when communicating with health-care professionals. Materials and Methods: The present study entitled effectiveness of communication board on communication pattern and level of anxiety. The research design adopted was pre-experimental non-equivalent, post-test only with control group design. A total number of 60 samples (30 samples for experimental group and 30 samples for control group) were selected using non-probability purposive sampling technique. The communication board was implemented as a strategy to communicate the needs of patients in the experimental group. The samples in control group were on routine treatment. About 2060 min after extubation, the post-test assessment of level of communication and anxiety was done using modified ease of communication scale and hospital anxiety and depression scale, respectively, in both experimental and control group. The data analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: In post-test, patients on mechanical ventilator had 6.93 ± 1.43 mean level of anxiety in the experimental group and 14.7 ± 2.28 mean level of anxiety in the control group, so the mean difference is 7.77 and the calculated independent t-test value is 1.93 and it is statistically significant at P < 0.05 level.","PeriodicalId":92656,"journal":{"name":"International journal of nursing research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Communication Board on Ease of Communication and Anxiety among Patients on Mechanical Ventilator\",\"authors\":\"T. Titus, R. Manimozhi, R. Ba\",\"doi\":\"10.31690/ijnmi.2022.v07i02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Patients with physical and sensory disabilities, such as deafness, blindness, and patient with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation have been shown to face considerable barriers when communicating with health-care professionals. Materials and Methods: The present study entitled effectiveness of communication board on communication pattern and level of anxiety. The research design adopted was pre-experimental non-equivalent, post-test only with control group design. A total number of 60 samples (30 samples for experimental group and 30 samples for control group) were selected using non-probability purposive sampling technique. The communication board was implemented as a strategy to communicate the needs of patients in the experimental group. The samples in control group were on routine treatment. About 2060 min after extubation, the post-test assessment of level of communication and anxiety was done using modified ease of communication scale and hospital anxiety and depression scale, respectively, in both experimental and control group. The data analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: In post-test, patients on mechanical ventilator had 6.93 ± 1.43 mean level of anxiety in the experimental group and 14.7 ± 2.28 mean level of anxiety in the control group, so the mean difference is 7.77 and the calculated independent t-test value is 1.93 and it is statistically significant at P < 0.05 level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of nursing research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of nursing research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31690/ijnmi.2022.v07i02.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31690/ijnmi.2022.v07i02.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有身体和感觉残疾的患者,如耳聋、失明,以及气管插管和机械通气的患者,在与卫生保健专业人员沟通时面临相当大的障碍。材料与方法:本研究题为“沟通板对沟通模式和焦虑水平的有效性”。研究采用实验前非等效设计,后验只采用对照组设计。采用非概率目的抽样技术,共选取60个样本(试验组30个,对照组30个)。沟通板作为一种策略来沟通实验组患者的需求。对照组采用常规治疗。拔管后约2060 min,实验组和对照组分别采用改进的交流便利量表和医院焦虑抑郁量表进行交流和焦虑水平的测试后评估。数据分析采用描述性统计和推理统计。结果:测试后,机械呼吸机患者焦虑水平均值实验组为6.93±1.43,对照组为14.7±2.28,平均差异为7.77,计算独立t检验值为1.93,P < 0.05水平上有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Communication Board on Ease of Communication and Anxiety among Patients on Mechanical Ventilator
Background: Patients with physical and sensory disabilities, such as deafness, blindness, and patient with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation have been shown to face considerable barriers when communicating with health-care professionals. Materials and Methods: The present study entitled effectiveness of communication board on communication pattern and level of anxiety. The research design adopted was pre-experimental non-equivalent, post-test only with control group design. A total number of 60 samples (30 samples for experimental group and 30 samples for control group) were selected using non-probability purposive sampling technique. The communication board was implemented as a strategy to communicate the needs of patients in the experimental group. The samples in control group were on routine treatment. About 2060 min after extubation, the post-test assessment of level of communication and anxiety was done using modified ease of communication scale and hospital anxiety and depression scale, respectively, in both experimental and control group. The data analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: In post-test, patients on mechanical ventilator had 6.93 ± 1.43 mean level of anxiety in the experimental group and 14.7 ± 2.28 mean level of anxiety in the control group, so the mean difference is 7.77 and the calculated independent t-test value is 1.93 and it is statistically significant at P < 0.05 level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信