{"title":"拨动正确的心弦:混音共享平台中艺术家知识产权平衡的理论途径","authors":"Nicole Greenstein","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/rq5cx","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 R I. BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 R A. The Rise of Remix Culture and the Copyright Backlash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 R B. Licensing Sampling-Based Music . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 R C. Remixes and the Fair Use Defense . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 R II. A REMIXER’S LABOR OF LOVE: LOCKEAN THEORY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 R A. An Introduction to Locke’s Labor Theory . . . . . . 221 R B. A Lockean Approach to Intellectual Property and Remix Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 R C. The Law of Accession and the Improving Remixer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 R III. FOSTERING MUSICAL CREATION: UTILITARIAN THEORIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 R A. The Tragedy of the Free Rider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 R B. The Freedom in the Commons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 R IV. THE SOUL BEHIND THE SONGS: PERSONHOOD THEORY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 R A. An Introduction to Personhood Theory . . . . . . . . 234 R B. The Personhood Right in Remix Culture . . . . . . . 235 R CONCLUSION: SOLVING THE REMIX RIGHTS STALEMATE . . . . . . . . 237 R","PeriodicalId":51518,"journal":{"name":"Cornell Law Review","volume":"102 1","pages":"211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Striking the Right Chord: A Theoretical Approach to Balancing Artists' Intellectual Property Rights on Remix Audio-Sharing Platforms\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Greenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.31228/osf.io/rq5cx\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 R I. BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 R A. The Rise of Remix Culture and the Copyright Backlash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 R B. Licensing Sampling-Based Music . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 R C. Remixes and the Fair Use Defense . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 R II. A REMIXER’S LABOR OF LOVE: LOCKEAN THEORY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 R A. An Introduction to Locke’s Labor Theory . . . . . . 221 R B. A Lockean Approach to Intellectual Property and Remix Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 R C. The Law of Accession and the Improving Remixer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 R III. FOSTERING MUSICAL CREATION: UTILITARIAN THEORIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 R A. The Tragedy of the Free Rider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 R B. The Freedom in the Commons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 R IV. THE SOUL BEHIND THE SONGS: PERSONHOOD THEORY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 R A. An Introduction to Personhood Theory . . . . . . . . 234 R B. The Personhood Right in Remix Culture . . . . . . . 235 R CONCLUSION: SOLVING THE REMIX RIGHTS STALEMATE . . . . . . . . 237 R\",\"PeriodicalId\":51518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornell Law Review\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornell Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/rq5cx\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornell Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/rq5cx","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介。212背景。216 R.A.混音文化的兴起与版权风波。216 R.B.许可基于采样的音乐。218 R.C.汇款和合理使用辩护。219 R II。混音师的爱的劳动:洛克知识产权理论。221 R A.洛克劳动理论导论。221 R.B.知识产权和汇款权的Lockean方法。223 R.C.加入法和改进的汇款人。226 R III.促进音乐创作:知识产权的功利主义理论。229 R.A.自由骑士的悲剧。229 R.B.下议院的自由。232歌曲背后的灵魂:知识产权人格理论。234 R.A.人格理论导论。234 R.B.混音文化中的人格权。235 R结论:解决混音权僵局。237 R
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1915, the Cornell Law Review is a student-run and student-edited journal that strives to publish novel scholarship that will have an immediate and lasting impact on the legal community. The Cornell Law Review publishes six issues annually consisting of articles, essays, book reviews, and student notes.