打击:制定积极成文法防止残疾陪审员歧视性强制罢工的必要性。

IF 2.5 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Cornell Law Review Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.31228/osf.io/5hnrf

Jordan Benson

{"title":"打击:制定积极成文法防止残疾陪审员歧视性强制罢工的必要性。","authors":"Jordan Benson","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/5hnrf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438 R I. JURY SELECTION AND THE BATSON RIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 441 R II. CREATION AND EXPANSION OF THE BATSON CHALLENGE . 442 R A. Mechanics of the Batson Challenge . . . . . . . . . . . 442 R B. Batson’s Equal Protection Analysis Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 R III. EXISTING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS UNLIKELY TO LEAD TO THE EXTENSION OF BATSON PROTECTIONS TO THE DISABLED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447 R A. Disability Is Subject Only to Rational Basis Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448 R B. The ADA Does Not Entitle the Disabled to Heightened Scrutiny Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 R C. Statutory Protections of the ADA Do Not Independently Entitle the Disabled to BatsonLike Hearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452 R D. Recent Appellate Court Decisions Have Upheld the Use of Peremptory Strikes Against Disabled Jurors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452 R IV. COULD THE RATIONAL BASIS TEST PROVIDE PROTECTIONS FOR DISABLED JURORS?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454 R V. POSITIVE STATUTORY LAW IS NEEDED TO PREVENT DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN JURY SELECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 458 R A. Federal Legislation Is Unlikely to Be Successful in Reducing Discriminatory Peremptory Strikes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459 R","PeriodicalId":51518,"journal":{"name":"Cornell Law Review","volume":"103 2 1","pages":"437-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stricken: the Need for Positive Statutory Law to Prevent Discriminatory Peremptory Strikes of Disabled Jurors.\",\"authors\":\"Jordan Benson\",\"doi\":\"10.31228/osf.io/5hnrf\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438 R I. JURY SELECTION AND THE BATSON RIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 441 R II. CREATION AND EXPANSION OF THE BATSON CHALLENGE . 442 R A. Mechanics of the Batson Challenge . . . . . . . . . . . 442 R B. Batson’s Equal Protection Analysis Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 R III. EXISTING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS UNLIKELY TO LEAD TO THE EXTENSION OF BATSON PROTECTIONS TO THE DISABLED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447 R A. Disability Is Subject Only to Rational Basis Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448 R B. The ADA Does Not Entitle the Disabled to Heightened Scrutiny Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 R C. Statutory Protections of the ADA Do Not Independently Entitle the Disabled to BatsonLike Hearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452 R D. Recent Appellate Court Decisions Have Upheld the Use of Peremptory Strikes Against Disabled Jurors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452 R IV. COULD THE RATIONAL BASIS TEST PROVIDE PROTECTIONS FOR DISABLED JURORS?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454 R V. POSITIVE STATUTORY LAW IS NEEDED TO PREVENT DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN JURY SELECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 458 R A. Federal Legislation Is Unlikely to Be Successful in Reducing Discriminatory Peremptory Strikes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459 R\",\"PeriodicalId\":51518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornell Law Review\",\"volume\":\"103 2 1\",\"pages\":\"437-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornell Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/5hnrf\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornell Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/5hnrf","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

简介。438 R.I.陪审团的选择和巴特森权利。441 R II。巴特森挑战赛的创建和扩展。442 R A.巴特森挑战赛的力学。442 R B.Batson的平等保护分析框架。445 R III.现行宪法不太可能将巴特森保护扩大到残疾人。447 R.A.残疾仅接受理性基础审查。448 R.B.《残疾人法案》不赋予残疾人加强审查保护的权利。450 R.C.《美国残疾人法》的法定保护不独立地赋予残疾人类似蝙蝠的听证会的权利。452 R.D.最近上诉法院的裁决搁置了对残疾陪审员使用永久罢工。452 R IV.理性基础测试能为残疾陪审员提供保护吗。454诉积极成文法需要防止陪审团选择中基于残疾的歧视。458 R.A.联邦立法不太可能成功减少歧视性永久罢工。459 R

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Stricken: the Need for Positive Statutory Law to Prevent Discriminatory Peremptory Strikes of Disabled Jurors.

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438 R I. JURY SELECTION AND THE BATSON RIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 441 R II. CREATION AND EXPANSION OF THE BATSON CHALLENGE . 442 R A. Mechanics of the Batson Challenge . . . . . . . . . . . 442 R B. Batson’s Equal Protection Analysis Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 R III. EXISTING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS UNLIKELY TO LEAD TO THE EXTENSION OF BATSON PROTECTIONS TO THE DISABLED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 447 R A. Disability Is Subject Only to Rational Basis Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448 R B. The ADA Does Not Entitle the Disabled to Heightened Scrutiny Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 R C. Statutory Protections of the ADA Do Not Independently Entitle the Disabled to BatsonLike Hearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452 R D. Recent Appellate Court Decisions Have Upheld the Use of Peremptory Strikes Against Disabled Jurors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452 R IV. COULD THE RATIONAL BASIS TEST PROVIDE PROTECTIONS FOR DISABLED JURORS?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454 R V. POSITIVE STATUTORY LAW IS NEEDED TO PREVENT DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN JURY SELECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 458 R A. Federal Legislation Is Unlikely to Be Successful in Reducing Discriminatory Peremptory Strikes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459 R

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cornell Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1915, the Cornell Law Review is a student-run and student-edited journal that strives to publish novel scholarship that will have an immediate and lasting impact on the legal community. The Cornell Law Review publishes six issues annually consisting of articles, essays, book reviews, and student notes.