群体决策的概率语言q阶正交模糊阿基米德聚集算子

Q1 Decision Sciences
Medikonda Jaya Ranjan, Bonda Pavan Kumar, T. D. Bhavani, Annam Venkata Padmavathi, Vinod Bakka
{"title":"群体决策的概率语言q阶正交模糊阿基米德聚集算子","authors":"Medikonda Jaya Ranjan, Bonda Pavan Kumar, T. D. Bhavani, Annam Venkata Padmavathi, Vinod Bakka","doi":"10.31181/dmame622023527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To express uncertain and imprecise information systematically, the concept of probabilistic linguistic q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy set (PLqROFS), which is an advanced version of linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy set, considering the instantaneous occurrence of stochastic and non-stochastic-uncertainty. There isn't yet any literature on PLqROFSs that addresses the issue of the relative importance of experts and criteria. The evaluation's findings consequently become irrational. Additionally, the aggregation operators that are currently available on PLqROFSs are too rigid. The primary goal is to resolve these problems by creating a new methodology that makes use of a new flexible aggregation operator. In this paper, a novel integrated framework is suggested to address concerns with group decision-making in PLqROFSs settings by combining the strengths of the power average operator (PAO), the Archimedean operator, and the full consistency method (FUCOM). With the extended variance approach on PLqROFSs, the weight of decision experts is methodically determined in this line. Additionally, the FUCOM on PLqROFSs is used to determine the weight of the criterion. Some probabilistic linguistic q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy Archimedean weighted and power weighted aggregation operators are suggested to aggregate decision experts' preferences. To discuss the viability of the suggested technique, the challenge of choosing a CO2 storage location is given. As alternatives, we have taken into account oilfields, gas fields, basalt formations, and coal resources. Basalt is the best choice, according to the outcome. The stability of our method is demonstrated by the sensitivity analysis of the criteria weights. The comparative analysis demonstrates that, in comparison to the ones already in use, our model is more significant and realistic.","PeriodicalId":32695,"journal":{"name":"Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy Archimedean aggregation operators for group decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Medikonda Jaya Ranjan, Bonda Pavan Kumar, T. D. Bhavani, Annam Venkata Padmavathi, Vinod Bakka\",\"doi\":\"10.31181/dmame622023527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To express uncertain and imprecise information systematically, the concept of probabilistic linguistic q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy set (PLqROFS), which is an advanced version of linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy set, considering the instantaneous occurrence of stochastic and non-stochastic-uncertainty. There isn't yet any literature on PLqROFSs that addresses the issue of the relative importance of experts and criteria. The evaluation's findings consequently become irrational. Additionally, the aggregation operators that are currently available on PLqROFSs are too rigid. The primary goal is to resolve these problems by creating a new methodology that makes use of a new flexible aggregation operator. In this paper, a novel integrated framework is suggested to address concerns with group decision-making in PLqROFSs settings by combining the strengths of the power average operator (PAO), the Archimedean operator, and the full consistency method (FUCOM). With the extended variance approach on PLqROFSs, the weight of decision experts is methodically determined in this line. Additionally, the FUCOM on PLqROFSs is used to determine the weight of the criterion. Some probabilistic linguistic q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy Archimedean weighted and power weighted aggregation operators are suggested to aggregate decision experts' preferences. To discuss the viability of the suggested technique, the challenge of choosing a CO2 storage location is given. As alternatives, we have taken into account oilfields, gas fields, basalt formations, and coal resources. Basalt is the best choice, according to the outcome. The stability of our method is demonstrated by the sensitivity analysis of the criteria weights. The comparative analysis demonstrates that, in comparison to the ones already in use, our model is more significant and realistic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame622023527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame622023527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

为了系统地表达不确定和不精确的信息,考虑到随机和非随机不确定性的瞬时发生,提出了概率语言q-rung正交对模糊集(PLqROFS)的概念,它是语言直觉模糊集和语言毕达哥拉斯模糊集的改进版本。目前还没有任何关于plqrofs的文献解决专家和标准的相对重要性问题。因此,评估结果变得不合理。此外,plqrofs上当前可用的聚合操作符过于严格。我们的主要目标是通过创建一种使用新的灵活聚合操作符的新方法来解决这些问题。本文结合功率平均算子(PAO)、阿基米德算子(Archimedean operator)和完全一致性方法(FUCOM)的优势,提出了一种新的集成框架来解决plqrofs设置中的群体决策问题。利用plqrofs的扩展方差方法,在这条线上系统地确定了决策专家的权重。此外,利用plqrofs上的FUCOM来确定判据的权重。提出了几种概率语言q阶正交对模糊阿基米德加权和幂加权聚合算子,用于对决策专家的偏好进行聚合。为了讨论所建议的技术的可行性,提出了选择二氧化碳储存地点的挑战。作为备选方案,我们考虑了油田、气田、玄武岩地层和煤炭资源。根据结果,玄武岩是最好的选择。通过对准则权值的敏感性分析,证明了该方法的稳定性。对比分析表明,与现有的模型相比,我们的模型更具有现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probabilistic linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy Archimedean aggregation operators for group decision-making
To express uncertain and imprecise information systematically, the concept of probabilistic linguistic q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy set (PLqROFS), which is an advanced version of linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy set, considering the instantaneous occurrence of stochastic and non-stochastic-uncertainty. There isn't yet any literature on PLqROFSs that addresses the issue of the relative importance of experts and criteria. The evaluation's findings consequently become irrational. Additionally, the aggregation operators that are currently available on PLqROFSs are too rigid. The primary goal is to resolve these problems by creating a new methodology that makes use of a new flexible aggregation operator. In this paper, a novel integrated framework is suggested to address concerns with group decision-making in PLqROFSs settings by combining the strengths of the power average operator (PAO), the Archimedean operator, and the full consistency method (FUCOM). With the extended variance approach on PLqROFSs, the weight of decision experts is methodically determined in this line. Additionally, the FUCOM on PLqROFSs is used to determine the weight of the criterion. Some probabilistic linguistic q-rung ortho-pair fuzzy Archimedean weighted and power weighted aggregation operators are suggested to aggregate decision experts' preferences. To discuss the viability of the suggested technique, the challenge of choosing a CO2 storage location is given. As alternatives, we have taken into account oilfields, gas fields, basalt formations, and coal resources. Basalt is the best choice, according to the outcome. The stability of our method is demonstrated by the sensitivity analysis of the criteria weights. The comparative analysis demonstrates that, in comparison to the ones already in use, our model is more significant and realistic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering
Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering Decision Sciences-General Decision Sciences
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信