社区和领土可持续发展背景下土地改革的体制陷阱

V. Zakharchenko
{"title":"社区和领土可持续发展背景下土地改革的体制陷阱","authors":"V. Zakharchenko","doi":"10.33245/2310-9262-2022-177-2-137-151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers topical issues of institutional support of land reform in Ukraine in the context of sustainable development of communities and territories. The purpose of the research is to disclose the content of key institutional traps of the land market in the context of sustainable development of communities and territories of Ukraine (primarily rural) taking into account the challenges of martial law. It is shown that the land is not only an operational basis for the creation of villages, cities, agglomerations, resettlement systems; this is also an important factor in agricultural production. The necessity of transformation of old and creation of new institutions or \"rules of the game\" in the field of land relations and agricultural production for sustainable development of communities and territories is substantiated. It is noted that among these institutions there are also those that produce negative results. V.M. Polterovich defines them as institutional traps. Institutional traps that appeared as a result of the transfer of agricultural land of state ownership to the communal. The problem manifestations that they have or can have in the aspect of sustainable development of communities and territories, especially in the conditions of martial law, are analyzed, namely: inversion and unconstitutional procedure for transferring land from state property to communal property; simplification of the scheme of transfer of land to private ownership; increasing manifestations of land corruption at the local level; inefficiency of communication in land issues of local self-government, business and state; weakening state control over land use and protection; inconsistency of land management and planning documentation within the framework of a comprehensive plan for spatial development of communities; lack of financial support for inventory of land in communities; land use is not for the intended purpose; uncertainty with the payment of land in the event of a change in the purpose of the land plot; threat of overstatement or understatement of land prices; strengthening the differentiation of territorial communities by the value of land assets and their financial capacity; lack of state support for agricultural producers; reduction of efficiency of small agricultural producers; strengthening the negative impact of agricultural holdings on the sustainable development of rural areas; the disappearance of villages and furization rural settlement network. Ways of avoiding and smoothing the negative consequences of institutional traps related to transactions on the transfer of agricultural land outside settlements to communal property are proposed. The emphasis is on increasing the role of state bodies in the regulation of land relations at the local level and the practical implementation of the concept of integrated development of communities and territories.\nKey words: land reform, form of ownership of land (state, communal, private), market turnover of agricultural land, institute, institutional trap, territory, territorial community, sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":53051,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional traps of land reform in the context of sustainable development of communities and territories\",\"authors\":\"V. Zakharchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.33245/2310-9262-2022-177-2-137-151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article considers topical issues of institutional support of land reform in Ukraine in the context of sustainable development of communities and territories. The purpose of the research is to disclose the content of key institutional traps of the land market in the context of sustainable development of communities and territories of Ukraine (primarily rural) taking into account the challenges of martial law. It is shown that the land is not only an operational basis for the creation of villages, cities, agglomerations, resettlement systems; this is also an important factor in agricultural production. The necessity of transformation of old and creation of new institutions or \\\"rules of the game\\\" in the field of land relations and agricultural production for sustainable development of communities and territories is substantiated. It is noted that among these institutions there are also those that produce negative results. V.M. Polterovich defines them as institutional traps. Institutional traps that appeared as a result of the transfer of agricultural land of state ownership to the communal. The problem manifestations that they have or can have in the aspect of sustainable development of communities and territories, especially in the conditions of martial law, are analyzed, namely: inversion and unconstitutional procedure for transferring land from state property to communal property; simplification of the scheme of transfer of land to private ownership; increasing manifestations of land corruption at the local level; inefficiency of communication in land issues of local self-government, business and state; weakening state control over land use and protection; inconsistency of land management and planning documentation within the framework of a comprehensive plan for spatial development of communities; lack of financial support for inventory of land in communities; land use is not for the intended purpose; uncertainty with the payment of land in the event of a change in the purpose of the land plot; threat of overstatement or understatement of land prices; strengthening the differentiation of territorial communities by the value of land assets and their financial capacity; lack of state support for agricultural producers; reduction of efficiency of small agricultural producers; strengthening the negative impact of agricultural holdings on the sustainable development of rural areas; the disappearance of villages and furization rural settlement network. Ways of avoiding and smoothing the negative consequences of institutional traps related to transactions on the transfer of agricultural land outside settlements to communal property are proposed. The emphasis is on increasing the role of state bodies in the regulation of land relations at the local level and the practical implementation of the concept of integrated development of communities and territories.\\nKey words: land reform, form of ownership of land (state, communal, private), market turnover of agricultural land, institute, institutional trap, territory, territorial community, sustainable development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33245/2310-9262-2022-177-2-137-151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33245/2310-9262-2022-177-2-137-151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了在社区和领土可持续发展的背景下乌克兰土地改革的机构支持的专题问题。研究的目的是在考虑到戒严令的挑战的情况下,在乌克兰社区和领土(主要是农村)可持续发展的背景下,揭示土地市场的关键制度陷阱的内容。它表明,土地不仅是创建村庄、城市、聚集区、安置系统的操作基础;这也是农业生产中的一个重要因素。在土地关系和农业生产领域,为了社区和领土的可持续发展,必须改造旧的和创造新的机构或“游戏规则”。应当指出,在这些机构中也有产生消极结果的机构。V.M. Polterovich将其定义为制度陷阱。由于国有农业用地转为公有而出现的制度陷阱。分析了它们在社区和领土可持续发展方面,特别是在戒严条件下已经或可能出现的问题表现,即:土地从国有财产转为公有财产的倒置和违宪程序;简化土地私有制方案;地方土地腐败现象增多;地方自治、企业和国家在土地问题上的沟通效率低下弱化国家对土地使用和保护的控制;在社区空间发展综合计划框架内的土地管理和规划文件不一致;缺乏对社区土地清查的财政支持;土地用途并非原定用途;在土地用途改变时,土地支付的不确定性;可能高估或低估地价;根据土地资产的价值及其财政能力加强对领土社区的区分;缺乏国家对农业生产者的支持;降低小型农业生产者的效率;强化农业控股对农村可持续发展的负面影响;乡村的消失与乡村聚落网络的激化。提出了避免和消除与交易有关的制度陷阱的消极后果的方法,这些交易涉及将定居点以外的农业用地转让给公共财产。重点是加强国家机构在地方一级管理土地关系方面的作用,并切实执行社区和领土综合发展的概念。关键词:土地改革,土地所有制形式(国有、公有、私有),农用地市场流转,制度,制度陷阱,领土,领土共同体,可持续发展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional traps of land reform in the context of sustainable development of communities and territories
The article considers topical issues of institutional support of land reform in Ukraine in the context of sustainable development of communities and territories. The purpose of the research is to disclose the content of key institutional traps of the land market in the context of sustainable development of communities and territories of Ukraine (primarily rural) taking into account the challenges of martial law. It is shown that the land is not only an operational basis for the creation of villages, cities, agglomerations, resettlement systems; this is also an important factor in agricultural production. The necessity of transformation of old and creation of new institutions or "rules of the game" in the field of land relations and agricultural production for sustainable development of communities and territories is substantiated. It is noted that among these institutions there are also those that produce negative results. V.M. Polterovich defines them as institutional traps. Institutional traps that appeared as a result of the transfer of agricultural land of state ownership to the communal. The problem manifestations that they have or can have in the aspect of sustainable development of communities and territories, especially in the conditions of martial law, are analyzed, namely: inversion and unconstitutional procedure for transferring land from state property to communal property; simplification of the scheme of transfer of land to private ownership; increasing manifestations of land corruption at the local level; inefficiency of communication in land issues of local self-government, business and state; weakening state control over land use and protection; inconsistency of land management and planning documentation within the framework of a comprehensive plan for spatial development of communities; lack of financial support for inventory of land in communities; land use is not for the intended purpose; uncertainty with the payment of land in the event of a change in the purpose of the land plot; threat of overstatement or understatement of land prices; strengthening the differentiation of territorial communities by the value of land assets and their financial capacity; lack of state support for agricultural producers; reduction of efficiency of small agricultural producers; strengthening the negative impact of agricultural holdings on the sustainable development of rural areas; the disappearance of villages and furization rural settlement network. Ways of avoiding and smoothing the negative consequences of institutional traps related to transactions on the transfer of agricultural land outside settlements to communal property are proposed. The emphasis is on increasing the role of state bodies in the regulation of land relations at the local level and the practical implementation of the concept of integrated development of communities and territories. Key words: land reform, form of ownership of land (state, communal, private), market turnover of agricultural land, institute, institutional trap, territory, territorial community, sustainable development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信