{"title":"柏拉图《诡辩家》中的唯心主义","authors":"Arasi T. Gevorkian","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967260343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marxist studies in the history of philosophy are based on the assumption that all philosophical schools and currents fall into two main traditions, materialism and idealism, and that the whole of the history of philosophy can be described as an opposition between the two. Lenin observed that this distinction goes back to antiquity, and that even then the \"tendencies \"l of Democritus and Plato were already in evidence.","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"26 1","pages":"43-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967260343","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Idealism in Plato's Sophist\",\"authors\":\"Arasi T. Gevorkian\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/RSP1061-1967260343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Marxist studies in the history of philosophy are based on the assumption that all philosophical schools and currents fall into two main traditions, materialism and idealism, and that the whole of the history of philosophy can be described as an opposition between the two. Lenin observed that this distinction goes back to antiquity, and that even then the \\\"tendencies \\\"l of Democritus and Plato were already in evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soviet studies in philosophy\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"43-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967260343\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soviet studies in philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967260343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet studies in philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967260343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Marxist studies in the history of philosophy are based on the assumption that all philosophical schools and currents fall into two main traditions, materialism and idealism, and that the whole of the history of philosophy can be described as an opposition between the two. Lenin observed that this distinction goes back to antiquity, and that even then the "tendencies "l of Democritus and Plato were already in evidence.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
