财政部长以解释《支持新投资法》一般条款为借口进行的立法活动

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Błażej Kuźniacki
{"title":"财政部长以解释《支持新投资法》一般条款为借口进行的立法活动","authors":"Błażej Kuźniacki","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to ensure uniform application of the tax law by tax authorities, the minister responsible for public finance (Minister of Finance, MoF) may issue general interpretations of the tax law ex officio or at the request of a taxpayer. When issuing general interpretations, the MoF is subject to the same rules of interpretation as any interpreter. In particular, when interpreting tax law, the MoF cannot change the content of the interpreted provisions of law, as such action would exceed the limits of interpretation and encroach on the territory reserved for the legislator. This article positively verifies the hypothesis that the MoF, in its general interpretation of 25 October 2019, while clarifying the scope of the exemption from taxation of income from activities in the Polish Investment Zone, added to the provisions of the income tax laws a condition of “close connections” for such exemption, which never existed in tax law. Thus, it unlawfully took over the role of the legislator. The article thoroughly analyses the reasons and consequences of such an action, including the most recent legislative changes implemented within the framework of the so-called Polish Deal.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prawotwórcza działalność ministra finansów pod pozorem interpretacji ogólnej przepisów ustawy o wspieraniu nowych inwestycji\",\"authors\":\"Błażej Kuźniacki\",\"doi\":\"10.31268/ps.2022.140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to ensure uniform application of the tax law by tax authorities, the minister responsible for public finance (Minister of Finance, MoF) may issue general interpretations of the tax law ex officio or at the request of a taxpayer. When issuing general interpretations, the MoF is subject to the same rules of interpretation as any interpreter. In particular, when interpreting tax law, the MoF cannot change the content of the interpreted provisions of law, as such action would exceed the limits of interpretation and encroach on the territory reserved for the legislator. This article positively verifies the hypothesis that the MoF, in its general interpretation of 25 October 2019, while clarifying the scope of the exemption from taxation of income from activities in the Polish Investment Zone, added to the provisions of the income tax laws a condition of “close connections” for such exemption, which never existed in tax law. Thus, it unlawfully took over the role of the legislator. The article thoroughly analyses the reasons and consequences of such an action, including the most recent legislative changes implemented within the framework of the so-called Polish Deal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了确保税务机关统一适用税法,负责公共财政的部长(minister of finance, MoF)可依职权或应纳税人的要求发布税法的一般解释。财政部发布一般解释,适用与解释员相同的解释规则。特别是,在解释税法时,财政部不能改变被解释的法律条款的内容,因为这样做会超出解释的范围,侵犯立法者的领地。本文积极验证了财政部在其2019年10月25日的一般性解释中提出的假设,即在澄清波兰投资区活动所得免税范围的同时,在所得税法的规定中增加了税法中从未存在的“密切联系”条件。因此,它非法地取代了立法者的角色。本文详尽地分析了这种行动的原因和后果,包括在所谓的《波兰协定》框架内最近实施的立法改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prawotwórcza działalność ministra finansów pod pozorem interpretacji ogólnej przepisów ustawy o wspieraniu nowych inwestycji
In order to ensure uniform application of the tax law by tax authorities, the minister responsible for public finance (Minister of Finance, MoF) may issue general interpretations of the tax law ex officio or at the request of a taxpayer. When issuing general interpretations, the MoF is subject to the same rules of interpretation as any interpreter. In particular, when interpreting tax law, the MoF cannot change the content of the interpreted provisions of law, as such action would exceed the limits of interpretation and encroach on the territory reserved for the legislator. This article positively verifies the hypothesis that the MoF, in its general interpretation of 25 October 2019, while clarifying the scope of the exemption from taxation of income from activities in the Polish Investment Zone, added to the provisions of the income tax laws a condition of “close connections” for such exemption, which never existed in tax law. Thus, it unlawfully took over the role of the legislator. The article thoroughly analyses the reasons and consequences of such an action, including the most recent legislative changes implemented within the framework of the so-called Polish Deal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信