你有5分钟的空闲时间吗?-生态系统服务研究中利益相关者过程的挑战

Q2 Environmental Science
Landscape Online Pub Date : 2014-10-02 DOI:10.3097/LO.201437
Lars Koschke, S. Meulen, S. Frank, Anna Schneidergruber, M. Kruse, C. Fürst, Esther Neubert, Bettina Ohnesorge, Claudia Schröder, F. Müller, O. Bastian
{"title":"你有5分钟的空闲时间吗?-生态系统服务研究中利益相关者过程的挑战","authors":"Lars Koschke, S. Meulen, S. Frank, Anna Schneidergruber, M. Kruse, C. Fürst, Esther Neubert, Bettina Ohnesorge, Claudia Schröder, F. Müller, O. Bastian","doi":"10.3097/LO.201437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Operationalization of the ecosystem services (ES) concept for improved natural resource management and decision support cannot, thus far, be rated as satisfactory. Participation of stakeholders is still a major methodical and conceptual challenge for implementing ES. Therefore, we conducted an online survey and a literature analysis to identify benefits and challenges of the application of ES in participatory processes. The results show that the purpose of stakeholder engagement is very diverse as a result of varying objectives, spatial scales and institutional levels of analysis. The complexity, terminology and (lacking) coherent classification of ES are pivotal aspects that should be accounted for in the design of studies to improve stakeholder participation. Although limitations of time and financial resources are bigger challenges than ES related ones, tailoring communication strategies and information for different stakeholder groups are of major importance for the success of ES studies. Results support the view that the potential benefits of applying ES, e.g., consensus finding, and development of integrated solutions, cannot be realized consistently across the different spatial scales and decision-making levels. Focusing on stakeholder processes represents a means to increase the relevance, reliability and impact of study results and to move participation in ES research from theory to reality.","PeriodicalId":38803,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Online","volume":"37 1","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do you have 5 minutes to spare? -The challenges of stakeholder processes in ecosystem services studies\",\"authors\":\"Lars Koschke, S. Meulen, S. Frank, Anna Schneidergruber, M. Kruse, C. Fürst, Esther Neubert, Bettina Ohnesorge, Claudia Schröder, F. Müller, O. Bastian\",\"doi\":\"10.3097/LO.201437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Operationalization of the ecosystem services (ES) concept for improved natural resource management and decision support cannot, thus far, be rated as satisfactory. Participation of stakeholders is still a major methodical and conceptual challenge for implementing ES. Therefore, we conducted an online survey and a literature analysis to identify benefits and challenges of the application of ES in participatory processes. The results show that the purpose of stakeholder engagement is very diverse as a result of varying objectives, spatial scales and institutional levels of analysis. The complexity, terminology and (lacking) coherent classification of ES are pivotal aspects that should be accounted for in the design of studies to improve stakeholder participation. Although limitations of time and financial resources are bigger challenges than ES related ones, tailoring communication strategies and information for different stakeholder groups are of major importance for the success of ES studies. Results support the view that the potential benefits of applying ES, e.g., consensus finding, and development of integrated solutions, cannot be realized consistently across the different spatial scales and decision-making levels. Focusing on stakeholder processes represents a means to increase the relevance, reliability and impact of study results and to move participation in ES research from theory to reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape Online\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

迄今为止,改善自然资源管理和决策支持的生态系统服务概念的实施还不能令人满意。利益相关者的参与仍然是实施ES的主要方法和概念挑战。因此,我们进行了一项在线调查和文献分析,以确定在参与式过程中应用ES的好处和挑战。研究结果表明,利益相关者参与的目的由于分析的目标、空间尺度和制度层次的不同而非常多样化。ES的复杂性、术语和(缺乏)连贯分类是研究设计中应该考虑的关键方面,以提高利益相关者的参与。虽然时间和财政资源的限制比ES相关的挑战更大,但为不同的利益相关者群体量身定制沟通策略和信息对于ES研究的成功至关重要。研究结果表明,在不同的空间尺度和决策层面,应用生态系统的潜在效益(如共识发现和综合解决方案的开发)并不能一致地实现。关注利益相关者过程是提高研究结果的相关性、可靠性和影响的一种手段,并将参与ES研究从理论转向现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do you have 5 minutes to spare? -The challenges of stakeholder processes in ecosystem services studies
Operationalization of the ecosystem services (ES) concept for improved natural resource management and decision support cannot, thus far, be rated as satisfactory. Participation of stakeholders is still a major methodical and conceptual challenge for implementing ES. Therefore, we conducted an online survey and a literature analysis to identify benefits and challenges of the application of ES in participatory processes. The results show that the purpose of stakeholder engagement is very diverse as a result of varying objectives, spatial scales and institutional levels of analysis. The complexity, terminology and (lacking) coherent classification of ES are pivotal aspects that should be accounted for in the design of studies to improve stakeholder participation. Although limitations of time and financial resources are bigger challenges than ES related ones, tailoring communication strategies and information for different stakeholder groups are of major importance for the success of ES studies. Results support the view that the potential benefits of applying ES, e.g., consensus finding, and development of integrated solutions, cannot be realized consistently across the different spatial scales and decision-making levels. Focusing on stakeholder processes represents a means to increase the relevance, reliability and impact of study results and to move participation in ES research from theory to reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape Online
Landscape Online Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape Online focuses on studies dealing with landscape research. The subject matter deals with any scientific, educational or applied aspect of processes, dynamics, indicators, controllers and visions related to landscapes. Furthermore, Landscape Online emphasizes the coupling of societal and natural systems, not only the involvement of human impact on landscape systems but also human perception of the landscape, its values and the evaluation of landscapes. Moreover, articles are appropriate that deal with landscape theory, system approaches and conceptual models of landscape, both their improvement and their discussion. Papers may be undisciplinary or multidisciplinary but have interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary appeal. All kinds of articles or parts of it must not be published beforehand in another journal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信