为什么班加西“得救”了,而辛贾尔却失守了?:防止种族灭绝的新失败,2007-2015年

Q3 Social Sciences
Hannibal Travis
{"title":"为什么班加西“得救”了,而辛贾尔却失守了?:防止种族灭绝的新失败,2007-2015年","authors":"Hannibal Travis","doi":"10.3138/GSI.10.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I examine legal, political, and cultural reasons behind the genocides in Iraq and Syria of 2007–2015, that decimated the Yezidi communities of Sinjar or Shingal (Şengal/Şingal/Şingar). It is typically argued that failures to prevent genocide occur due to imaginative deficits or fear of a military quagmire. However, I show that atrocities are quickly recognized and sanctioned in some cases, and that substantial resources in terms of international support, military assets, and political rhetoric have been generated in several cases in which groups were less threatened than the Yezidis. To explain the disparate responses to claims of imminent persecution or massacre, I develop the theory of the \"Reverse CNN Effect,\" in which some tragedies do not receive the requisite attention of the mass media to mobilize action. The phenomenon extends beyond the media to the resolutions and reports of the United Nations and, at times, those of the US government.","PeriodicalId":40844,"journal":{"name":"Genocide Studies International","volume":"10 1","pages":"139 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3138/GSI.10.2.03","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Was Benghazi \\\"Saved,\\\" but Sinjar Allowed to Be Lost?: New Failures of Genocide Prevention, 2007–2015\",\"authors\":\"Hannibal Travis\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/GSI.10.2.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I examine legal, political, and cultural reasons behind the genocides in Iraq and Syria of 2007–2015, that decimated the Yezidi communities of Sinjar or Shingal (Şengal/Şingal/Şingar). It is typically argued that failures to prevent genocide occur due to imaginative deficits or fear of a military quagmire. However, I show that atrocities are quickly recognized and sanctioned in some cases, and that substantial resources in terms of international support, military assets, and political rhetoric have been generated in several cases in which groups were less threatened than the Yezidis. To explain the disparate responses to claims of imminent persecution or massacre, I develop the theory of the \\\"Reverse CNN Effect,\\\" in which some tragedies do not receive the requisite attention of the mass media to mobilize action. The phenomenon extends beyond the media to the resolutions and reports of the United Nations and, at times, those of the US government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genocide Studies International\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"139 - 182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3138/GSI.10.2.03\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genocide Studies International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/GSI.10.2.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genocide Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/GSI.10.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇文章中,我研究了2007-2015年伊拉克和叙利亚种族灭绝背后的法律、政治和文化原因,这些种族灭绝摧毁了辛贾尔或辛加尔的雅兹迪社区(Şengal/Şingal/Şingar)。通常认为,未能防止种族灭绝是由于想象力不足或对军事困境的恐惧。然而,我指出,在某些情况下,暴行很快就得到了承认和制裁,在某些情况下,一些群体受到的威胁比雅兹迪人小,国际支持、军事资产和政治言论方面的大量资源已经产生。为了解释对迫在眉睫的迫害或屠杀的不同反应,我提出了“反向CNN效应”理论,其中一些悲剧没有得到大众媒体的必要关注来动员行动。这种现象从媒体延伸到联合国的决议和报告,有时也延伸到美国政府的决议和报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Was Benghazi "Saved," but Sinjar Allowed to Be Lost?: New Failures of Genocide Prevention, 2007–2015
In this article, I examine legal, political, and cultural reasons behind the genocides in Iraq and Syria of 2007–2015, that decimated the Yezidi communities of Sinjar or Shingal (Şengal/Şingal/Şingar). It is typically argued that failures to prevent genocide occur due to imaginative deficits or fear of a military quagmire. However, I show that atrocities are quickly recognized and sanctioned in some cases, and that substantial resources in terms of international support, military assets, and political rhetoric have been generated in several cases in which groups were less threatened than the Yezidis. To explain the disparate responses to claims of imminent persecution or massacre, I develop the theory of the "Reverse CNN Effect," in which some tragedies do not receive the requisite attention of the mass media to mobilize action. The phenomenon extends beyond the media to the resolutions and reports of the United Nations and, at times, those of the US government.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genocide Studies International
Genocide Studies International POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信