使用sq4r来提高阅读能力:应该如何实施?

Dian Tri Riska Ekawati, Dzulfikri Dzulfikri, Saiyidi Hasbullah
{"title":"使用sq4r来提高阅读能力:应该如何实施?","authors":"Dian Tri Riska Ekawati, Dzulfikri Dzulfikri, Saiyidi Hasbullah","doi":"10.28944/reflektika.v15i2.580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For senior high school students, understanding literature has become a struggle. Impaired vocabulary and prior knowledge, grammatical flaws, and poor reading methods were all important factors in reading. As a result, this study aims to use SQ4R as a technique for overcoming learners’ difficulties in learning reading, particularly those studying English in SMKN 1 Bakung. SQ4R is one of the most widely used acronyms (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review, and Reflect). The SQ4R reading method is aimed to engage kids in reading activities, encourage them to enjoy reading, and enhance their academic achievement as a result. Students should apply what they already know to assist them learn new material, according to SQ4R. This study employs Classroom Action Research (CAR) at XI TKJ, using data obtained from two instruments: a post-test and observation sheets. A total of 26 students participated in the study. The findings of this study show that after being taught the approach, students’ reading ability improves. The students acquire an average score of 55.4 in pre-test. Then, their average score increases to 63.3 in the first cycle. The average score climbs to 73.3 average scores in the second round. The success criteria for this study were that 75% of the students (19 students) got a score of 65.","PeriodicalId":55780,"journal":{"name":"Reflektika","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE USE OF SQ4R FOR IMPROVING READING SKILL: HOW SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED?\",\"authors\":\"Dian Tri Riska Ekawati, Dzulfikri Dzulfikri, Saiyidi Hasbullah\",\"doi\":\"10.28944/reflektika.v15i2.580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For senior high school students, understanding literature has become a struggle. Impaired vocabulary and prior knowledge, grammatical flaws, and poor reading methods were all important factors in reading. As a result, this study aims to use SQ4R as a technique for overcoming learners’ difficulties in learning reading, particularly those studying English in SMKN 1 Bakung. SQ4R is one of the most widely used acronyms (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review, and Reflect). The SQ4R reading method is aimed to engage kids in reading activities, encourage them to enjoy reading, and enhance their academic achievement as a result. Students should apply what they already know to assist them learn new material, according to SQ4R. This study employs Classroom Action Research (CAR) at XI TKJ, using data obtained from two instruments: a post-test and observation sheets. A total of 26 students participated in the study. The findings of this study show that after being taught the approach, students’ reading ability improves. The students acquire an average score of 55.4 in pre-test. Then, their average score increases to 63.3 in the first cycle. The average score climbs to 73.3 average scores in the second round. The success criteria for this study were that 75% of the students (19 students) got a score of 65.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reflektika\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reflektika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28944/reflektika.v15i2.580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflektika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28944/reflektika.v15i2.580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于高中生来说,理解文学已经成为一种挣扎。词汇和先验知识的缺失、语法缺陷和糟糕的阅读方法都是影响阅读的重要因素。因此,本研究旨在使用SQ4R作为一种技术来克服学习者在学习阅读方面的困难,特别是那些在SMKN 1 Bakung学习英语的学习者。SQ4R是使用最广泛的缩写词之一(Survey, Question, Read,朗诵,Review, Reflect)。SQ4R阅读法旨在让孩子们参与到阅读活动中,鼓励他们享受阅读,从而提高他们的学习成绩。根据SQ4R的说法,学生应该运用他们已经知道的知识来帮助他们学习新的材料。本研究采用课堂行动研究(CAR),使用两种工具获得的数据:后测和观察表。共有26名学生参与了这项研究。本研究的结果表明,采用这种方法教学后,学生的阅读能力有所提高。学生在前测中的平均成绩为55.4分。然后,他们的平均分在第一个周期上升到63.3分。第二轮的平均分数上升到73.3分。本次研究的成功标准是75%的学生(19名)得到65分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE USE OF SQ4R FOR IMPROVING READING SKILL: HOW SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED?
For senior high school students, understanding literature has become a struggle. Impaired vocabulary and prior knowledge, grammatical flaws, and poor reading methods were all important factors in reading. As a result, this study aims to use SQ4R as a technique for overcoming learners’ difficulties in learning reading, particularly those studying English in SMKN 1 Bakung. SQ4R is one of the most widely used acronyms (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review, and Reflect). The SQ4R reading method is aimed to engage kids in reading activities, encourage them to enjoy reading, and enhance their academic achievement as a result. Students should apply what they already know to assist them learn new material, according to SQ4R. This study employs Classroom Action Research (CAR) at XI TKJ, using data obtained from two instruments: a post-test and observation sheets. A total of 26 students participated in the study. The findings of this study show that after being taught the approach, students’ reading ability improves. The students acquire an average score of 55.4 in pre-test. Then, their average score increases to 63.3 in the first cycle. The average score climbs to 73.3 average scores in the second round. The success criteria for this study were that 75% of the students (19 students) got a score of 65.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信