关于生殖潜力和招募的不同假设对NAFO 2分区和klmno 3司格陵兰大比目鱼种群管理战略评价的影响

Q3 Environmental Science
F. González-Costas, D. González-Troncoso, M. Morgan, H. Murua, D. Garcia
{"title":"关于生殖潜力和招募的不同假设对NAFO 2分区和klmno 3司格陵兰大比目鱼种群管理战略评价的影响","authors":"F. González-Costas, D. González-Troncoso, M. Morgan, H. Murua, D. Garcia","doi":"10.2960/J.V48.M705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We tested whether our perception of the performance of the adopted Harvest Control Rule (HCR) for Greenland halibut was robust to using different measures of Reproductive Potential (RP) combined with different assumptions about the stock recruit relationship to drive the stock dynamics in simulations. We tested the HCR using alternative stock recruitment functions (segmented regression, Ricker and modified Ricker) with different RP indices which vary in the level of biological complexity. The RP indices used in increasing order of biological information were: Biomass 10+, SSB with varying maturity at age (SSB), female SSB (FSB), and Total Egg Production (TEP). All Operating Models (OM) were based on the current accepted XSA assessment. Understanding the basis of uncertainty in the S/R relationships is generally the most difficult outstanding problem in fisheries assessment and management and it is a key problem in Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE). A Ricker stock recruitment function fits the Greenland halibut stock recruitment data better than the segmented regression for all the RP indices, except TEP. The results show that the inclusion of more biological information when estimating Reproductive Potential does not improve the stock recruitment fit for either (segmented regression or Ricker). The best fits in both cases were obtained in descending order with: 10+Biomass, SSB, FSB, and TEP. All the OMs based on the segmented regression have very similar results and seem to be robust to assumptions about RP. However, there was variability in the results of the different indices of RP in the Ricker and modified Ricker OMs and some impact on whether performance targets were met. The choice of stock recruit function had a greater impact than the inclusion of more biological information in the index of RP. The inclusion of alternative indices of RP is likely to have more of an impact for stocks with depleted reproductive capacity and/or where alternative indices have a greater effect on the S/R relationships.","PeriodicalId":16669,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of different assumptions about reproductive potential and recruitment on a Management Strategy Evaluation for the Greenland halibut stock in NAFO Subarea 2 and Division 3KLMNO\",\"authors\":\"F. González-Costas, D. González-Troncoso, M. Morgan, H. Murua, D. Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.2960/J.V48.M705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We tested whether our perception of the performance of the adopted Harvest Control Rule (HCR) for Greenland halibut was robust to using different measures of Reproductive Potential (RP) combined with different assumptions about the stock recruit relationship to drive the stock dynamics in simulations. We tested the HCR using alternative stock recruitment functions (segmented regression, Ricker and modified Ricker) with different RP indices which vary in the level of biological complexity. The RP indices used in increasing order of biological information were: Biomass 10+, SSB with varying maturity at age (SSB), female SSB (FSB), and Total Egg Production (TEP). All Operating Models (OM) were based on the current accepted XSA assessment. Understanding the basis of uncertainty in the S/R relationships is generally the most difficult outstanding problem in fisheries assessment and management and it is a key problem in Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE). A Ricker stock recruitment function fits the Greenland halibut stock recruitment data better than the segmented regression for all the RP indices, except TEP. The results show that the inclusion of more biological information when estimating Reproductive Potential does not improve the stock recruitment fit for either (segmented regression or Ricker). The best fits in both cases were obtained in descending order with: 10+Biomass, SSB, FSB, and TEP. All the OMs based on the segmented regression have very similar results and seem to be robust to assumptions about RP. However, there was variability in the results of the different indices of RP in the Ricker and modified Ricker OMs and some impact on whether performance targets were met. The choice of stock recruit function had a greater impact than the inclusion of more biological information in the index of RP. The inclusion of alternative indices of RP is likely to have more of an impact for stocks with depleted reproductive capacity and/or where alternative indices have a greater effect on the S/R relationships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2960/J.V48.M705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2960/J.V48.M705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们在模拟中测试了我们对格陵兰大比目鱼采收控制规则(HCR)性能的感知是否稳健,使用不同的生殖潜能(RP)测量方法结合不同的种群招募关系假设来驱动种群动态。我们使用不同RP指数的替代种群招募函数(分段回归、Ricker和修正Ricker)测试了HCR,这些RP指数在生物复杂性水平上有所不同。RP指标按生物信息从小到大顺序依次为:生物量10+、不同龄龄SSB (SSB)、雌性SSB (FSB)和总产蛋量(TEP)。所有的操作模型(OM)都是基于当前公认的XSA评估。了解S/R关系的不确定性基础通常是渔业评估和管理中最困难的突出问题,也是管理战略评估(MSE)中的关键问题。除TEP外,对于所有RP指标,Ricker种群招募函数都比分段回归更适合格陵兰大比目鱼种群招募数据。结果表明,在估计繁殖势时,包括更多的生物信息并不能改善(分段回归和Ricker)的种群招募拟合。两种情况下的最佳拟合程度由高到低依次为:10+生物量、SSB、FSB和TEP。所有基于分段回归的OMs都有非常相似的结果,并且似乎对RP的假设具有鲁棒性。然而,在Ricker和改进的Ricker OMs中,RP的不同指标的结果存在差异,并且对是否达到绩效目标有一定的影响。股票招募函数的选择比纳入更多生物信息对RP指标的影响更大。对生殖能力枯竭和(或)替代指数对S/R关系影响较大的种群,列入RP的替代指数可能会产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of different assumptions about reproductive potential and recruitment on a Management Strategy Evaluation for the Greenland halibut stock in NAFO Subarea 2 and Division 3KLMNO
We tested whether our perception of the performance of the adopted Harvest Control Rule (HCR) for Greenland halibut was robust to using different measures of Reproductive Potential (RP) combined with different assumptions about the stock recruit relationship to drive the stock dynamics in simulations. We tested the HCR using alternative stock recruitment functions (segmented regression, Ricker and modified Ricker) with different RP indices which vary in the level of biological complexity. The RP indices used in increasing order of biological information were: Biomass 10+, SSB with varying maturity at age (SSB), female SSB (FSB), and Total Egg Production (TEP). All Operating Models (OM) were based on the current accepted XSA assessment. Understanding the basis of uncertainty in the S/R relationships is generally the most difficult outstanding problem in fisheries assessment and management and it is a key problem in Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE). A Ricker stock recruitment function fits the Greenland halibut stock recruitment data better than the segmented regression for all the RP indices, except TEP. The results show that the inclusion of more biological information when estimating Reproductive Potential does not improve the stock recruitment fit for either (segmented regression or Ricker). The best fits in both cases were obtained in descending order with: 10+Biomass, SSB, FSB, and TEP. All the OMs based on the segmented regression have very similar results and seem to be robust to assumptions about RP. However, there was variability in the results of the different indices of RP in the Ricker and modified Ricker OMs and some impact on whether performance targets were met. The choice of stock recruit function had a greater impact than the inclusion of more biological information in the index of RP. The inclusion of alternative indices of RP is likely to have more of an impact for stocks with depleted reproductive capacity and/or where alternative indices have a greater effect on the S/R relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science
Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The journal focuses on environmental, biological, economic and social science aspects of living marine resources and ecosystems of the northwest Atlantic Ocean. It also welcomes inter-disciplinary fishery-related papers and contributions of general applicability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信