A. Roma, Inês Ruas, R. Rocha, V. Gonçalves, A. Sá, Cátia Águas, Emmanuel Bonnarens, C. Coelho, Fátima Monsanto, E. Carolino
{"title":"乳腺肿瘤体内剂量测定:测量剂量与计算剂量的比较","authors":"A. Roma, Inês Ruas, R. Rocha, V. Gonçalves, A. Sá, Cátia Águas, Emmanuel Bonnarens, C. Coelho, Fátima Monsanto, E. Carolino","doi":"10.25758/SET.1371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction – In vivo dosimetry is useful in measuring the dose administered to patients during treatment, assessing significant differences between the prescribed dose and the dose to the target volume and the organs at risk. Purpose – To compare the measured dose with the calculated dose in patients with breast tumours with and without physical wedge. Methods – Entrance dose measurements using p-type diodes were performed for tangential fields and relative field-in-field in all 38 patients. Results – Statistically significant differences in open tangential fields ( ρ =0.000) were verified. Discussion – Studies report significant systematic deviations between planned and measured dose. Conclusion – With this study we conclude that there is no influence in the doses due to the presence of the physical wedge.","PeriodicalId":30555,"journal":{"name":"Saude Tecnologia","volume":"64 1","pages":"34-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetria in vivo em tumores de mama: comparação entre a dose medida e calculada\",\"authors\":\"A. Roma, Inês Ruas, R. Rocha, V. Gonçalves, A. Sá, Cátia Águas, Emmanuel Bonnarens, C. Coelho, Fátima Monsanto, E. Carolino\",\"doi\":\"10.25758/SET.1371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction – In vivo dosimetry is useful in measuring the dose administered to patients during treatment, assessing significant differences between the prescribed dose and the dose to the target volume and the organs at risk. Purpose – To compare the measured dose with the calculated dose in patients with breast tumours with and without physical wedge. Methods – Entrance dose measurements using p-type diodes were performed for tangential fields and relative field-in-field in all 38 patients. Results – Statistically significant differences in open tangential fields ( ρ =0.000) were verified. Discussion – Studies report significant systematic deviations between planned and measured dose. Conclusion – With this study we conclude that there is no influence in the doses due to the presence of the physical wedge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saude Tecnologia\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"34-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saude Tecnologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25758/SET.1371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saude Tecnologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25758/SET.1371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dosimetria in vivo em tumores de mama: comparação entre a dose medida e calculada
Introduction – In vivo dosimetry is useful in measuring the dose administered to patients during treatment, assessing significant differences between the prescribed dose and the dose to the target volume and the organs at risk. Purpose – To compare the measured dose with the calculated dose in patients with breast tumours with and without physical wedge. Methods – Entrance dose measurements using p-type diodes were performed for tangential fields and relative field-in-field in all 38 patients. Results – Statistically significant differences in open tangential fields ( ρ =0.000) were verified. Discussion – Studies report significant systematic deviations between planned and measured dose. Conclusion – With this study we conclude that there is no influence in the doses due to the presence of the physical wedge.