研究改革之路:对1971年精神治疗体验中的参与者进行网络分析

F. Söhner, T. Halling, T. Becker, H. Fangerau
{"title":"研究改革之路:对1971年精神治疗体验中的参与者进行网络分析","authors":"F. Söhner, T. Halling, T. Becker, H. Fangerau","doi":"10.25162/sudhoff-2018-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the institutional development of psychiatry in West-Germany after 1945. It analyses the impact of institutional and individual relationships on the West-German Post-war psychiatry. The methods used here are an extensive research and documentary analysis as well as a qualitative content analysis of expert interviews. The main focus was on the thought collective of the Federal German reform-orientated psychiatry in the run-up of the “Psychiatrie-Enquete”. The evaluation of the expert interviews as well as the institutional structures showed the central role of Caspar Kulenkampff and Heinz Hafner. Both had an excellent network in the scene of the “Psychiatrie-Enquete’s” preparation phase. As a further result of this survey it can be asserted that not only protagonists, understood as central persons, appeared as influential figures, but also persons who had not been suspected in this role, e. g. the occupational therapist Christiane Haerlin or the former chairman of the Association of Statuary Health Insurance Physicians Josef Schmitz-Formes. In summary, the development initiating the Enquete was not defined by only one or few actors.","PeriodicalId":76565,"journal":{"name":"Sudhoffs Archiv","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auf dem Weg zur Reform: Ein netzwerkanalytischer Blick auf die Akteure im Vorfeld der Psychiatrie-Enquete von 1971\",\"authors\":\"F. Söhner, T. Halling, T. Becker, H. Fangerau\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/sudhoff-2018-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on the institutional development of psychiatry in West-Germany after 1945. It analyses the impact of institutional and individual relationships on the West-German Post-war psychiatry. The methods used here are an extensive research and documentary analysis as well as a qualitative content analysis of expert interviews. The main focus was on the thought collective of the Federal German reform-orientated psychiatry in the run-up of the “Psychiatrie-Enquete”. The evaluation of the expert interviews as well as the institutional structures showed the central role of Caspar Kulenkampff and Heinz Hafner. Both had an excellent network in the scene of the “Psychiatrie-Enquete’s” preparation phase. As a further result of this survey it can be asserted that not only protagonists, understood as central persons, appeared as influential figures, but also persons who had not been suspected in this role, e. g. the occupational therapist Christiane Haerlin or the former chairman of the Association of Statuary Health Insurance Physicians Josef Schmitz-Formes. In summary, the development initiating the Enquete was not defined by only one or few actors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sudhoffs Archiv\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sudhoffs Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/sudhoff-2018-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudhoffs Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/sudhoff-2018-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要研究1945年后西德精神病学的制度发展。它分析了制度和个人关系对西德战后精神病学的影响。这里使用的方法是广泛的研究和文献分析以及专家访谈的定性内容分析。会议的主要焦点是在“精神病学研究”筹备阶段,德国联邦改革精神病学的思想集合体。对专家访谈和制度结构的评估显示了卡斯帕·库伦坎夫和海因茨·哈夫纳的核心作用。在“精神病学调查”的准备阶段,两人都有一个很好的网络。作为这项调查的进一步结果,可以断言,不仅被理解为中心人物的主角似乎是有影响力的人物,而且那些没有被怀疑扮演这一角色的人,例如职业治疗师Christiane Haerlin或雕像健康保险医师协会前主席Josef Schmitz-Formes。总之,启动Enquete的开发不是由一个或几个参与者定义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auf dem Weg zur Reform: Ein netzwerkanalytischer Blick auf die Akteure im Vorfeld der Psychiatrie-Enquete von 1971
This article focuses on the institutional development of psychiatry in West-Germany after 1945. It analyses the impact of institutional and individual relationships on the West-German Post-war psychiatry. The methods used here are an extensive research and documentary analysis as well as a qualitative content analysis of expert interviews. The main focus was on the thought collective of the Federal German reform-orientated psychiatry in the run-up of the “Psychiatrie-Enquete”. The evaluation of the expert interviews as well as the institutional structures showed the central role of Caspar Kulenkampff and Heinz Hafner. Both had an excellent network in the scene of the “Psychiatrie-Enquete’s” preparation phase. As a further result of this survey it can be asserted that not only protagonists, understood as central persons, appeared as influential figures, but also persons who had not been suspected in this role, e. g. the occupational therapist Christiane Haerlin or the former chairman of the Association of Statuary Health Insurance Physicians Josef Schmitz-Formes. In summary, the development initiating the Enquete was not defined by only one or few actors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信