{"title":"普拉切茨的克里斯汀和他的拉丁语《赫巴里乌斯","authors":"Dana Stehlíková","doi":"10.25162/sudhoff-2017-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper summarizes the most recent findings about the Herbarium by Prague Master Cristannus of Prachatice († 1439), which is only available in manuscripts and has not been published yet. It brings the current list of all manuscripts known today, mentions chief sources for the Herbarium (Pseudo-Serapion’s ‘Liber Aggregatoris in simplici medicina’ and ‘Circa instans’), thoroughly describes the similar features and differences between both extant redactions and proposes their origin and possible Cristannus’ authorship of them. The next part of the paper focuses on the so-called second life of this Herbarium – its use in two Old Bohemian herbaria which, as a whole, used to be wrongfully attributed to Cristannus of Prachatice. The author points out another very significant source for both Old Bohemian texts – herbarium with inc. “galganum vel galgana”, known as ‘Galgant spice tract’ (so-called ‘Galgant-Gewurz-Traktat’) and in some mediaeval manuscripts said to be a part of ‘Melleus liquor’ collection. At the final part of the paper, the author focuses on the herbarium published as a part of the fourth and fifth edition of the so-called Medical books by Master Cristannus of Prachatice in the second half of the 16th century. She proves that this text is based on the socalled Galgant-Gewurz-Traktat and has no relation to Cristannus of Prachatice.","PeriodicalId":76565,"journal":{"name":"Sudhoffs Archiv","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Christian von Prachatitz und sein lateinischer Herbarius\",\"authors\":\"Dana Stehlíková\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/sudhoff-2017-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper summarizes the most recent findings about the Herbarium by Prague Master Cristannus of Prachatice († 1439), which is only available in manuscripts and has not been published yet. It brings the current list of all manuscripts known today, mentions chief sources for the Herbarium (Pseudo-Serapion’s ‘Liber Aggregatoris in simplici medicina’ and ‘Circa instans’), thoroughly describes the similar features and differences between both extant redactions and proposes their origin and possible Cristannus’ authorship of them. The next part of the paper focuses on the so-called second life of this Herbarium – its use in two Old Bohemian herbaria which, as a whole, used to be wrongfully attributed to Cristannus of Prachatice. The author points out another very significant source for both Old Bohemian texts – herbarium with inc. “galganum vel galgana”, known as ‘Galgant spice tract’ (so-called ‘Galgant-Gewurz-Traktat’) and in some mediaeval manuscripts said to be a part of ‘Melleus liquor’ collection. At the final part of the paper, the author focuses on the herbarium published as a part of the fourth and fifth edition of the so-called Medical books by Master Cristannus of Prachatice in the second half of the 16th century. She proves that this text is based on the socalled Galgant-Gewurz-Traktat and has no relation to Cristannus of Prachatice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sudhoffs Archiv\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sudhoffs Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/sudhoff-2017-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudhoffs Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/sudhoff-2017-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文总结了布拉格大师克里斯坦努斯(公元1439年)关于植物标本室的最新发现,该标本室仅以手稿形式存在,尚未出版。它带来了目前已知的所有手稿的列表,提到了植物标本室的主要来源(伪serapion的“Liber Aggregatoris in simplici medicina”和“Circa instans”),彻底描述了现存版本之间的相似特征和差异,并提出了它们的起源和可能的克里斯坦努斯的作者身份。论文的下一部分着重于这个植物标本馆所谓的第二次生命——它在两个旧波西米亚植物标本馆的使用,作为一个整体,曾经被错误地归咎于普拉卡蒂斯的克里斯坦努斯。作者指出了另一个非常重要的旧波西米亚文本来源-植物标本室与公司“galgalanum vel galgana”,被称为“galgalant spice tract”(所谓的“galgalant - gewurz - traktat”),在一些中世纪手稿中,据说是“Melleus liquor”收藏的一部分。在论文的最后一部分,作者将重点放在16世纪下半叶Cristannus of Prachatice大师出版的第四版和第五版所谓医学书籍的一部分的植物标本室上。她证明,这篇文章是基于所谓的Galgant-Gewurz-Traktat,并没有关系的克里斯坦努斯的实践。
Christian von Prachatitz und sein lateinischer Herbarius
The paper summarizes the most recent findings about the Herbarium by Prague Master Cristannus of Prachatice († 1439), which is only available in manuscripts and has not been published yet. It brings the current list of all manuscripts known today, mentions chief sources for the Herbarium (Pseudo-Serapion’s ‘Liber Aggregatoris in simplici medicina’ and ‘Circa instans’), thoroughly describes the similar features and differences between both extant redactions and proposes their origin and possible Cristannus’ authorship of them. The next part of the paper focuses on the so-called second life of this Herbarium – its use in two Old Bohemian herbaria which, as a whole, used to be wrongfully attributed to Cristannus of Prachatice. The author points out another very significant source for both Old Bohemian texts – herbarium with inc. “galganum vel galgana”, known as ‘Galgant spice tract’ (so-called ‘Galgant-Gewurz-Traktat’) and in some mediaeval manuscripts said to be a part of ‘Melleus liquor’ collection. At the final part of the paper, the author focuses on the herbarium published as a part of the fourth and fifth edition of the so-called Medical books by Master Cristannus of Prachatice in the second half of the 16th century. She proves that this text is based on the socalled Galgant-Gewurz-Traktat and has no relation to Cristannus of Prachatice.