从耐克诉卡斯基到玛莎·斯图尔特:第一修正案对公司发言人否认公共犯罪指控的保护

IF 1.1 2区社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2004-06-22 DOI:10.2307/3491415

Cynthia A. Caillavet

{"title":"从耐克诉卡斯基到玛莎·斯图尔特:第一修正案对公司发言人否认公共犯罪指控的保护","authors":"Cynthia A. Caillavet","doi":"10.2307/3491415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Richard Epstein once said that \"[i]t is difficult to conceive of ... a defense of freedom of speech so pure as to countenance securities fraud ... .\"' The regulation of false or misleading statements of material fact under the securities laws,2 like other regulations of false or misleading commercial speech, has been upheld under First Amendment analysis, despite the fact that such regulations necessarily curtail speech.3 This rubric is problematic, however, when applied to certain types of corporate speech that have become prevalent in today's climate of overlapping legal, political, social, economic, and popular culture.","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3491415","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Nike V. Kasky to Martha Stewart: First Amendment Protection for Corporate Speakers' Denials of Public Criminal Allegations\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia A. Caillavet\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3491415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Richard Epstein once said that \\\"[i]t is difficult to conceive of ... a defense of freedom of speech so pure as to countenance securities fraud ... .\\\"' The regulation of false or misleading statements of material fact under the securities laws,2 like other regulations of false or misleading commercial speech, has been upheld under First Amendment analysis, despite the fact that such regulations necessarily curtail speech.3 This rubric is problematic, however, when applied to certain types of corporate speech that have become prevalent in today's climate of overlapping legal, political, social, economic, and popular culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3491415\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3491415\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3491415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

理查德·爱泼斯坦曾经说过:“很难想象……对言论自由的辩护如此纯粹以至于支持证券欺诈... ."在证券法下对重大事实的虚假或误导性陈述的监管，就像对虚假或误导性商业言论的其他监管一样，在第一修正案的分析下得到了支持，尽管这样的监管必然会限制言论然而，在当今法律、政治、社会、经济和流行文化相互重叠的环境中，当将这种分类应用于某些类型的公司言论时，就会出现问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

From Nike V. Kasky to Martha Stewart: First Amendment Protection for Corporate Speakers' Denials of Public Criminal Allegations

Richard Epstein once said that "[i]t is difficult to conceive of ... a defense of freedom of speech so pure as to countenance securities fraud ... ."' The regulation of false or misleading statements of material fact under the securities laws,2 like other regulations of false or misleading commercial speech, has been upheld under First Amendment analysis, despite the fact that such regulations necessarily curtail speech.3 This rubric is problematic, however, when applied to certain types of corporate speech that have become prevalent in today's climate of overlapping legal, political, social, economic, and popular culture.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal remains one of the most widely read and widely cited publications in the world. It is the second most widely subscribed journal published by any law school in the country. It is one of the most widely circulated law journals in the country, and our broad readership includes judges and legal academics, as well as practitioners, criminologists, and police officers. Research in the area of criminal law and criminology addresses concerns that are pertinent to most of American society. The Journal strives to publish the very best scholarship in this area, inspiring the intellectual debate and discussion essential to the development of social reform.