重新评估城市化理论

Q3 Social Sciences
Johanna Hoerning
{"title":"重新评估城市化理论","authors":"Johanna Hoerning","doi":"10.25162/gz-2019-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current theoretical debates on urbanization processes point to the need to re-examine the urban and the non-urban as categories as well as in their relationship to each other. This theoretical paper critically examines the current and inspiring debate on “planetary urbanization” and stresses the need to reconsider the corporeality of urban encounter, the relationship between urban and rural, and the contentious political practice involving land, territory, and property. It is argued that rural and urban spaces can be understood as political spaces that refer to specific ways of regulating and contesting land, territory and property, depending on the power relations prevailing in each case. Research questions are developed from conflating the theoretical perspective with the example of Brazilian urban and rural movements.","PeriodicalId":35646,"journal":{"name":"Geographische Zeitschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassessing Urbanization Theory\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Hoerning\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/gz-2019-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current theoretical debates on urbanization processes point to the need to re-examine the urban and the non-urban as categories as well as in their relationship to each other. This theoretical paper critically examines the current and inspiring debate on “planetary urbanization” and stresses the need to reconsider the corporeality of urban encounter, the relationship between urban and rural, and the contentious political practice involving land, territory, and property. It is argued that rural and urban spaces can be understood as political spaces that refer to specific ways of regulating and contesting land, territory and property, depending on the power relations prevailing in each case. Research questions are developed from conflating the theoretical perspective with the example of Brazilian urban and rural movements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographische Zeitschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographische Zeitschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/gz-2019-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographische Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/gz-2019-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前关于城市化进程的理论辩论指出,需要重新审视城市和非城市的范畴以及它们之间的关系。这篇理论论文批判性地审视了当前关于“全球城市化”的鼓舞人心的辩论,并强调需要重新考虑城市遭遇的物质性、城市与农村之间的关系,以及涉及土地、领土和财产的有争议的政治实践。农村和城市空间可以被理解为政治空间,指的是根据每种情况下普遍存在的权力关系,对土地、领土和财产进行调节和争夺的具体方式。研究问题是从理论角度与巴西城市和农村运动的例子相结合发展起来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reassessing Urbanization Theory
Current theoretical debates on urbanization processes point to the need to re-examine the urban and the non-urban as categories as well as in their relationship to each other. This theoretical paper critically examines the current and inspiring debate on “planetary urbanization” and stresses the need to reconsider the corporeality of urban encounter, the relationship between urban and rural, and the contentious political practice involving land, territory, and property. It is argued that rural and urban spaces can be understood as political spaces that refer to specific ways of regulating and contesting land, territory and property, depending on the power relations prevailing in each case. Research questions are developed from conflating the theoretical perspective with the example of Brazilian urban and rural movements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geographische Zeitschrift
Geographische Zeitschrift Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Die Geographische Zeitschrift gehört seit ihrem Beginn im Jahr 1895 zu den führenden deutschsprachigen Zeitschriften ihres Faches. Heute widmet sich die Zeitschrift in meist deutschsprachigen aber auch englischen Beiträgen den Gegenwartsfragen der Anthropogeographie. Als international renommiertes Fachmedium ist sie einem hohen theoretischen und methodischen Anspruch verpflichtet. Die Qualität und Aktualität der Beiträge wird durch internationale Sachverständige — als "refereed journal" — garantiert. Gerade indem sie die traditionellen Grenzen ihres Faches überschreitet, trägt die Geographische Zeitschrift maßgeblich zur Weiterentwicklung und Fortschritt der Anthropogeographie bei.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信