加尔各答贫民窟成人汞柱血压计一次读数与平均三次读数血压的可比性研究

N. Karmakar, Saugat Banerjee, Amiya Das, A. Dasgupta, Mahul Mukhopadhyay
{"title":"加尔各答贫民窟成人汞柱血压计一次读数与平均三次读数血压的可比性研究","authors":"N. Karmakar, Saugat Banerjee, Amiya Das, A. Dasgupta, Mahul Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.24896/JRMDS.V4I4.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hypertension, a major chronic lifestyle disease is most prevalent non communicable disease inIndia. Blood pressure (BP) measurements in the community are generally performed with a mercurysphygmomanometer. However, it is the common teaching that average of at least three readings of bloodpressure measurement is considered to be the gold-standard method. How far this is true has been determinedin this study with the Aim: To find out the prevalence of hypertension and compare the one reading of bloodpressure taken by mercury sphygmomanometer with average of three such readings. Materials andMethods:This cross-sectional study was conducted from January-March 2015 among 160 adults of Chetla slum, Kolkatachosen through a two stage sample design. ubjects included -Male: 39.4%; Female: 60.6%. Data was collectedby interview and blood pressure measurements. Comparison was made between the first reading and theaverage of three readings of BP taken by mercury sphygmomanometer. Result: The overall prevalence ofhypertension was found to be 30 % (48). Strength of agreement between first reading of Blood Pressure with thatof average reading was excellent, with kappa=0.940. Conclusion: Though the average of three blood pressurereadings according to Standard operation Procedure is considered ideal for accurate Blood Pressuremeasurement it may not always be feasible to undertake such a practice especially at community level. Thisstudy observes that single reading can safely be considered for Blood Pressure measurement instead of averageof three readings. Key words: Blood Pressure measurement, One reading, Average of three readings, Mercury sphygmomanometer, Slum.","PeriodicalId":17001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on hypertension and comparability between one reading and average of three readings of blood pressure by mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in a slum of Kolkata\",\"authors\":\"N. Karmakar, Saugat Banerjee, Amiya Das, A. Dasgupta, Mahul Mukhopadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.24896/JRMDS.V4I4.233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Hypertension, a major chronic lifestyle disease is most prevalent non communicable disease inIndia. Blood pressure (BP) measurements in the community are generally performed with a mercurysphygmomanometer. However, it is the common teaching that average of at least three readings of bloodpressure measurement is considered to be the gold-standard method. How far this is true has been determinedin this study with the Aim: To find out the prevalence of hypertension and compare the one reading of bloodpressure taken by mercury sphygmomanometer with average of three such readings. Materials andMethods:This cross-sectional study was conducted from January-March 2015 among 160 adults of Chetla slum, Kolkatachosen through a two stage sample design. ubjects included -Male: 39.4%; Female: 60.6%. Data was collectedby interview and blood pressure measurements. Comparison was made between the first reading and theaverage of three readings of BP taken by mercury sphygmomanometer. Result: The overall prevalence ofhypertension was found to be 30 % (48). Strength of agreement between first reading of Blood Pressure with thatof average reading was excellent, with kappa=0.940. Conclusion: Though the average of three blood pressurereadings according to Standard operation Procedure is considered ideal for accurate Blood Pressuremeasurement it may not always be feasible to undertake such a practice especially at community level. Thisstudy observes that single reading can safely be considered for Blood Pressure measurement instead of averageof three readings. Key words: Blood Pressure measurement, One reading, Average of three readings, Mercury sphygmomanometer, Slum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24896/JRMDS.V4I4.233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24896/JRMDS.V4I4.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高血压是一种主要的慢性生活方式疾病,是印度最常见的非传染性疾病。在社区测量血压(BP)通常用水银血压计进行。然而,通常的教导是,至少三次血压测量的平均值被认为是金标准方法。这项研究的目的是:找出高血压的患病率,并将水银血压计测得的一次血压读数与三次平均读数进行比较。材料与方法:本横断面研究于2015年1月至3月在加尔各答乔克市切特拉贫民窟的160名成年人中进行,采用两阶段样本设计。纳入对象-男性:39.4%;女:60.6%。通过访谈和血压测量收集数据。将第一次读数与汞柱血压计三次读数的平均值进行比较。结果:高血压总患病率为30%(48)。血压首次读数与平均读数的一致性非常好,kappa=0.940。结论:虽然按照标准操作程序平均三次血压读数被认为是准确测量血压的理想方法,但这种做法并不总是可行的,特别是在社区一级。本研究观察到,单次读数可以安全地用于血压测量,而不是平均三次读数。关键词:血压测量,一次读数,三次读数平均值,水银血压计,贫民窟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study on hypertension and comparability between one reading and average of three readings of blood pressure by mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in a slum of Kolkata
Background: Hypertension, a major chronic lifestyle disease is most prevalent non communicable disease inIndia. Blood pressure (BP) measurements in the community are generally performed with a mercurysphygmomanometer. However, it is the common teaching that average of at least three readings of bloodpressure measurement is considered to be the gold-standard method. How far this is true has been determinedin this study with the Aim: To find out the prevalence of hypertension and compare the one reading of bloodpressure taken by mercury sphygmomanometer with average of three such readings. Materials andMethods:This cross-sectional study was conducted from January-March 2015 among 160 adults of Chetla slum, Kolkatachosen through a two stage sample design. ubjects included -Male: 39.4%; Female: 60.6%. Data was collectedby interview and blood pressure measurements. Comparison was made between the first reading and theaverage of three readings of BP taken by mercury sphygmomanometer. Result: The overall prevalence ofhypertension was found to be 30 % (48). Strength of agreement between first reading of Blood Pressure with thatof average reading was excellent, with kappa=0.940. Conclusion: Though the average of three blood pressurereadings according to Standard operation Procedure is considered ideal for accurate Blood Pressuremeasurement it may not always be feasible to undertake such a practice especially at community level. Thisstudy observes that single reading can safely be considered for Blood Pressure measurement instead of averageof three readings. Key words: Blood Pressure measurement, One reading, Average of three readings, Mercury sphygmomanometer, Slum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信