心理评估:在多元化背景下的创新思维

S. Maseko
{"title":"心理评估:在多元化背景下的创新思维","authors":"S. Maseko","doi":"10.25159/1812-6371/1629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychometric assessments in South Africa have been marred by controversy. Not only has the discipline of psychology been accused of being complicit with the apartheid regime, but some even argue that in post-apartheid South Africa psychology continues to maintain structural legacies introduced by apartheid (Suffla & Seedat, 2004). The book Psychological Assessment: Thinking innovatively in contexts of diversity attempts to grapple with these historical matters and how they affect psychometric practice in South Africa. The current text does this candidly without burying the reader in a heap of psychometric jargon.","PeriodicalId":92427,"journal":{"name":"New voices in psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: THINKING INNOVATIVELY IN CONTEXTS OF DIVERSITY\",\"authors\":\"S. Maseko\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/1812-6371/1629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Psychometric assessments in South Africa have been marred by controversy. Not only has the discipline of psychology been accused of being complicit with the apartheid regime, but some even argue that in post-apartheid South Africa psychology continues to maintain structural legacies introduced by apartheid (Suffla & Seedat, 2004). The book Psychological Assessment: Thinking innovatively in contexts of diversity attempts to grapple with these historical matters and how they affect psychometric practice in South Africa. The current text does this candidly without burying the reader in a heap of psychometric jargon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New voices in psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New voices in psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/1812-6371/1629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New voices in psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1812-6371/1629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

南非的心理测量评估一直受到争议的影响。心理学学科不仅被指责为种族隔离政权的同谋,而且有些人甚至认为,在种族隔离后的南非,心理学继续保持种族隔离带来的结构性遗产(Suffla & Seedat, 2004)。《心理评估:多样性背景下的创新思维》一书试图解决这些历史问题,以及它们如何影响南非的心理测量学实践。当前的文本坦率地做到了这一点,没有把读者埋在一堆心理测量术语中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: THINKING INNOVATIVELY IN CONTEXTS OF DIVERSITY
Psychometric assessments in South Africa have been marred by controversy. Not only has the discipline of psychology been accused of being complicit with the apartheid regime, but some even argue that in post-apartheid South Africa psychology continues to maintain structural legacies introduced by apartheid (Suffla & Seedat, 2004). The book Psychological Assessment: Thinking innovatively in contexts of diversity attempts to grapple with these historical matters and how they affect psychometric practice in South Africa. The current text does this candidly without burying the reader in a heap of psychometric jargon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信