巴林血液透析患者血管通路现状

R. Agha, Asma Al Qaseer, Amer AlDurazi, Ali H Al Aradi, Abdulraqeeb Taher, Salaheldin El Sharkaqi, Sharif Khashaba, Sughra Alhayki, Afrah Aljamri
{"title":"巴林血液透析患者血管通路现状","authors":"R. Agha, Asma Al Qaseer, Amer AlDurazi, Ali H Al Aradi, Abdulraqeeb Taher, Salaheldin El Sharkaqi, Sharif Khashaba, Sughra Alhayki, Afrah Aljamri","doi":"10.26715/jbms.33_2020_1_6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objective: Patients on hemodialysis (HD) require well-functioning vascular access for its initiation and successful transition to dialysis. Arteriovenous fistula is recognized internationally as the first choice of vascular access due to its long lifespan and low incidence of complications in comparison to other methods. Despite this, the rates remain poor. The aim of the study was to document the trend of vascular access currently observed in the hemodialysis centers. Methodology: This is cross-sectional study in Hemodialysis Centers in Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Bahrain. All patients undergoing regular hemodialysis in May 2020 were included in this study. Results: A total of 536 patients undergoing regular renal replacement therapy were recruited. Majority of the patients; 478 (89.2%) were on hemodialysis. Of them, 214 (44.8%) patients were on arteriovenous fistula/graft (AVF/ AVG), while the remaining 264 (55.2%) were on tunnel line. Causes of tunnel line hemodialysis were further evaluated. About 137(51.9%) patients were undergoing investigations. This was followed by patient refusal and unfit for surgery among thirty-five (13.3%) and 23 (8.7%) patients, respectively. The remaining patients were either awaiting surgery, or experienced complications post arteriovenous fistula/graft creation. Conclusion: In this study, a high use of tunnel line vascular access in HD was observed in comparison to AVF. A potential for higher utilization of AVF/AVG up to 60% was observed in this practice. Further studies and strategies to increase the usage of AVF is highly recommended to reach international standards and improve patient care.","PeriodicalId":85027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society = Majallat Jam'iyat al-Atibba' al-Bahrayniyah","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current State of Vascular Access in Patients on Hemodialysis in Bahrain\",\"authors\":\"R. Agha, Asma Al Qaseer, Amer AlDurazi, Ali H Al Aradi, Abdulraqeeb Taher, Salaheldin El Sharkaqi, Sharif Khashaba, Sughra Alhayki, Afrah Aljamri\",\"doi\":\"10.26715/jbms.33_2020_1_6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Objective: Patients on hemodialysis (HD) require well-functioning vascular access for its initiation and successful transition to dialysis. Arteriovenous fistula is recognized internationally as the first choice of vascular access due to its long lifespan and low incidence of complications in comparison to other methods. Despite this, the rates remain poor. The aim of the study was to document the trend of vascular access currently observed in the hemodialysis centers. Methodology: This is cross-sectional study in Hemodialysis Centers in Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Bahrain. All patients undergoing regular hemodialysis in May 2020 were included in this study. Results: A total of 536 patients undergoing regular renal replacement therapy were recruited. Majority of the patients; 478 (89.2%) were on hemodialysis. Of them, 214 (44.8%) patients were on arteriovenous fistula/graft (AVF/ AVG), while the remaining 264 (55.2%) were on tunnel line. Causes of tunnel line hemodialysis were further evaluated. About 137(51.9%) patients were undergoing investigations. This was followed by patient refusal and unfit for surgery among thirty-five (13.3%) and 23 (8.7%) patients, respectively. The remaining patients were either awaiting surgery, or experienced complications post arteriovenous fistula/graft creation. Conclusion: In this study, a high use of tunnel line vascular access in HD was observed in comparison to AVF. A potential for higher utilization of AVF/AVG up to 60% was observed in this practice. Further studies and strategies to increase the usage of AVF is highly recommended to reach international standards and improve patient care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society = Majallat Jam'iyat al-Atibba' al-Bahrayniyah\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society = Majallat Jam'iyat al-Atibba' al-Bahrayniyah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26715/jbms.33_2020_1_6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society = Majallat Jam'iyat al-Atibba' al-Bahrayniyah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26715/jbms.33_2020_1_6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:血液透析(HD)患者需要功能良好的血管通路才能开始并成功过渡到透析。动静脉瘘相对于其他方法具有使用寿命长、并发症发生率低的优点,是国际上公认的首选血管通路。尽管如此,这一比率仍然很低。该研究的目的是记录目前在血液透析中心观察到的血管通路趋势。方法:这是在巴林王国卫生部血液透析中心进行的横断面研究。所有于2020年5月进行常规血液透析的患者均纳入本研究。结果:共纳入536例接受常规肾脏替代治疗的患者。大多数患者;478例(89.2%)进行血液透析。其中动静脉瘘/移植物(AVF/ AVG) 214例(44.8%),隧道线264例(55.2%)。进一步分析隧道线血液透析的原因。137例(51.9%)患者接受调查。其次分别为35例(13.3%)和23例(8.7%)患者拒绝手术和不适合手术。其余患者要么等待手术,要么在动静脉瘘/移植物创建后出现并发症。结论:在本研究中,与AVF相比,HD中隧道线血管通路的使用率更高。在该实践中,AVF/AVG的利用率可能更高,最高可达60%。强烈建议进一步研究和制定策略,以增加AVF的使用,以达到国际标准并改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current State of Vascular Access in Patients on Hemodialysis in Bahrain
Background & Objective: Patients on hemodialysis (HD) require well-functioning vascular access for its initiation and successful transition to dialysis. Arteriovenous fistula is recognized internationally as the first choice of vascular access due to its long lifespan and low incidence of complications in comparison to other methods. Despite this, the rates remain poor. The aim of the study was to document the trend of vascular access currently observed in the hemodialysis centers. Methodology: This is cross-sectional study in Hemodialysis Centers in Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Bahrain. All patients undergoing regular hemodialysis in May 2020 were included in this study. Results: A total of 536 patients undergoing regular renal replacement therapy were recruited. Majority of the patients; 478 (89.2%) were on hemodialysis. Of them, 214 (44.8%) patients were on arteriovenous fistula/graft (AVF/ AVG), while the remaining 264 (55.2%) were on tunnel line. Causes of tunnel line hemodialysis were further evaluated. About 137(51.9%) patients were undergoing investigations. This was followed by patient refusal and unfit for surgery among thirty-five (13.3%) and 23 (8.7%) patients, respectively. The remaining patients were either awaiting surgery, or experienced complications post arteriovenous fistula/graft creation. Conclusion: In this study, a high use of tunnel line vascular access in HD was observed in comparison to AVF. A potential for higher utilization of AVF/AVG up to 60% was observed in this practice. Further studies and strategies to increase the usage of AVF is highly recommended to reach international standards and improve patient care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信