克罗地亚精神卫生政策的专门知识和发展:精神卫生专业人员的看法

Q4 Medicine
M. Novak, A. Petek
{"title":"克罗地亚精神卫生政策的专门知识和发展:精神卫生专业人员的看法","authors":"M. Novak, A. Petek","doi":"10.24869/spsih.2018.343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research shows that Croatian mental health policy is not a political priority, that it lacks interdisciplinarity, intersectoral collaboration and a holistic approach. Following the assumption that one of the main reasons for this position is the low level of knowledge in mental health policy- making, this study was set to examine the role of expertise and knowledge translation in Croatian mental health policy development. The study was conducted during spring 2018 and has included 124 participants, professionals from different institutions dealing with mental health, using the snowball method. The questionnaire “Development of Croatian Mental Health Policy” was developed for the purpose of this study. The gathered qualitative and quantitative data shows that professionals in the mental health sector describe policymaking in the field as being of poor quality and highly dependent on top governmental bodies that are run by the political elite uninterested in mental health. The data also proves that mental health professionals in Croatia think about the improvement of mental health policy in line with international guidelines. Still, they rarely consider themselves an active force in policy- making. That leads us to the conclusion that experts and professionals need support to form networks, advocacy coalitions and better inter- sectoral relationships in order to influence the political will.","PeriodicalId":53593,"journal":{"name":"Socijalna Psihijatrija","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expertise and Development of Croatian Mental Health Policy: the Perception of Mental Health Professionals\",\"authors\":\"M. Novak, A. Petek\",\"doi\":\"10.24869/spsih.2018.343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous research shows that Croatian mental health policy is not a political priority, that it lacks interdisciplinarity, intersectoral collaboration and a holistic approach. Following the assumption that one of the main reasons for this position is the low level of knowledge in mental health policy- making, this study was set to examine the role of expertise and knowledge translation in Croatian mental health policy development. The study was conducted during spring 2018 and has included 124 participants, professionals from different institutions dealing with mental health, using the snowball method. The questionnaire “Development of Croatian Mental Health Policy” was developed for the purpose of this study. The gathered qualitative and quantitative data shows that professionals in the mental health sector describe policymaking in the field as being of poor quality and highly dependent on top governmental bodies that are run by the political elite uninterested in mental health. The data also proves that mental health professionals in Croatia think about the improvement of mental health policy in line with international guidelines. Still, they rarely consider themselves an active force in policy- making. That leads us to the conclusion that experts and professionals need support to form networks, advocacy coalitions and better inter- sectoral relationships in order to influence the political will.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socijalna Psihijatrija\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socijalna Psihijatrija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24869/spsih.2018.343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socijalna Psihijatrija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24869/spsih.2018.343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

以前的研究表明,克罗地亚的心理健康政策不是一项政治优先事项,它缺乏跨学科、部门间合作和整体办法。假设造成这种情况的主要原因之一是精神卫生政策制定方面的知识水平较低,本研究旨在研究专业知识和知识翻译在克罗地亚精神卫生政策制定中的作用。这项研究是在2018年春季进行的,共有124名参与者,他们是来自不同机构的心理健康专业人员,使用了滚雪球法。为进行这项研究,编制了调查表"克罗地亚精神卫生政策的制定"。所收集的定性和定量数据表明,精神卫生部门的专业人员将该领域的决策描述为质量差,高度依赖由对精神卫生不感兴趣的政治精英管理的最高政府机构。数据还证明,克罗地亚的精神卫生专业人员考虑按照国际准则改进精神卫生政策。尽管如此,他们很少认为自己是政策制定中的积极力量。这使我们得出结论,专家和专业人员需要得到支持,以形成网络、倡导联盟和更好的部门间关系,以便影响政治意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expertise and Development of Croatian Mental Health Policy: the Perception of Mental Health Professionals
Previous research shows that Croatian mental health policy is not a political priority, that it lacks interdisciplinarity, intersectoral collaboration and a holistic approach. Following the assumption that one of the main reasons for this position is the low level of knowledge in mental health policy- making, this study was set to examine the role of expertise and knowledge translation in Croatian mental health policy development. The study was conducted during spring 2018 and has included 124 participants, professionals from different institutions dealing with mental health, using the snowball method. The questionnaire “Development of Croatian Mental Health Policy” was developed for the purpose of this study. The gathered qualitative and quantitative data shows that professionals in the mental health sector describe policymaking in the field as being of poor quality and highly dependent on top governmental bodies that are run by the political elite uninterested in mental health. The data also proves that mental health professionals in Croatia think about the improvement of mental health policy in line with international guidelines. Still, they rarely consider themselves an active force in policy- making. That leads us to the conclusion that experts and professionals need support to form networks, advocacy coalitions and better inter- sectoral relationships in order to influence the political will.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Socijalna Psihijatrija
Socijalna Psihijatrija Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Časopis "Socijalna psihijatrija" počeo je izlaziti 1973.god. na inicijativu prof.dr. Nikole Peršića (koji je bio i prvi urednik). Kroz cijelo razdoblje časopis izlazi redovito i kontinuirano i izrasta u vodeći (trenutačno i jedini) hrvatski psihijatrijski časopis. U "Socijalnoj psihijatriji" objavljuju se pregledni, izvorni, stručni i drugi radovi koji obuhvaćaju sve aspekte suvremene psihijatrije. Podjednako su zastupljene socijalna i biologijska psihijatrija, te psihodinamika. Takoder u časopisu izlaze članci iz srodnih i suradnih disciplina (neurologija, psihologija, defektologija, antropologija, socijalni rad).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信