用顺序萃取法分离底层沉积物和污水污泥中的重金属

Q4 Environmental Science
L. Dąbrowska
{"title":"用顺序萃取法分离底层沉积物和污水污泥中的重金属","authors":"L. Dąbrowska","doi":"10.2428/ECEA.2016.23(1)5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparison of heavy metal (Zn, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd, Cr) fractionation methods was done. Two different sequential extraction methods were investigated: Te ssier, and BCR method. For the experiment following materials were used: sewage sludge were collected f rom mechanical-biological municipal wastewater trea tment plant located in Czestochowa, and bottom sediment f rom the Poraj Reservoir. After results comparison, it was stated that content of particular chemical forms of heavy metals in total amount in sewage sludge and bottom sediment vary depending on used extraction method. Also in sewage sludge and bottom sediment cadmium concentrations measured in exchangeable-carbonate, i organic-sulfide, and in residual (insoluble comp ounds) fractions after extraction according to Tessier met hod, did not equal to values obtained after use of BCR extraction method. This also applied to zinc and lead concentr ations in iron and manganese oxides fraction. The d iscrepancy between the results could be explained with both: u sed extractants, and extraction conditions (differe nt agents, temperature, and time). The results point out how i mportant is the choice of a proper extraction metho d depending on the aim of speciation analysis but also dependin g on the analyzed chemical forms of heavy metals.","PeriodicalId":44472,"journal":{"name":"ECOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY AND ENGINEERING A-CHEMIA I INZYNIERIA EKOLOGICZNA A","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractionation of heavy metals in bottom sediments and sewage sludges using sequential extraction\",\"authors\":\"L. Dąbrowska\",\"doi\":\"10.2428/ECEA.2016.23(1)5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comparison of heavy metal (Zn, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd, Cr) fractionation methods was done. Two different sequential extraction methods were investigated: Te ssier, and BCR method. For the experiment following materials were used: sewage sludge were collected f rom mechanical-biological municipal wastewater trea tment plant located in Czestochowa, and bottom sediment f rom the Poraj Reservoir. After results comparison, it was stated that content of particular chemical forms of heavy metals in total amount in sewage sludge and bottom sediment vary depending on used extraction method. Also in sewage sludge and bottom sediment cadmium concentrations measured in exchangeable-carbonate, i organic-sulfide, and in residual (insoluble comp ounds) fractions after extraction according to Tessier met hod, did not equal to values obtained after use of BCR extraction method. This also applied to zinc and lead concentr ations in iron and manganese oxides fraction. The d iscrepancy between the results could be explained with both: u sed extractants, and extraction conditions (differe nt agents, temperature, and time). The results point out how i mportant is the choice of a proper extraction metho d depending on the aim of speciation analysis but also dependin g on the analyzed chemical forms of heavy metals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ECOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY AND ENGINEERING A-CHEMIA I INZYNIERIA EKOLOGICZNA A\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ECOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY AND ENGINEERING A-CHEMIA I INZYNIERIA EKOLOGICZNA A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2428/ECEA.2016.23(1)5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY AND ENGINEERING A-CHEMIA I INZYNIERIA EKOLOGICZNA A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2428/ECEA.2016.23(1)5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

比较了重金属(Zn、Cu、Ni、Pb、Cd、Cr)的分馏方法。研究了两种不同的顺序提取方法:siier法和BCR法。本实验采用的材料有:采自Czestochowa市机械-生物城市污水处理厂的污水污泥和Poraj水库的底泥。结果比较表明,不同的提取方法,污泥和底泥中重金属的某些化学形态的总含量有所不同。此外,在污水污泥和底泥中,根据Tessier met法提取后的可交换碳酸盐、有机硫化物和残余(不溶性化合物)馏分中镉的浓度也不等于使用BCR法提取后的值。这也适用于铁和锰氧化物馏分中锌和铅的浓度。结果之间的差异可以用两种因素来解释:使用的萃取剂和萃取条件(不同的萃取剂、温度和时间)。结果表明,根据形态分析的目的和所分析的重金属化学形态选择合适的提取方法是多么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fractionation of heavy metals in bottom sediments and sewage sludges using sequential extraction
Comparison of heavy metal (Zn, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd, Cr) fractionation methods was done. Two different sequential extraction methods were investigated: Te ssier, and BCR method. For the experiment following materials were used: sewage sludge were collected f rom mechanical-biological municipal wastewater trea tment plant located in Czestochowa, and bottom sediment f rom the Poraj Reservoir. After results comparison, it was stated that content of particular chemical forms of heavy metals in total amount in sewage sludge and bottom sediment vary depending on used extraction method. Also in sewage sludge and bottom sediment cadmium concentrations measured in exchangeable-carbonate, i organic-sulfide, and in residual (insoluble comp ounds) fractions after extraction according to Tessier met hod, did not equal to values obtained after use of BCR extraction method. This also applied to zinc and lead concentr ations in iron and manganese oxides fraction. The d iscrepancy between the results could be explained with both: u sed extractants, and extraction conditions (differe nt agents, temperature, and time). The results point out how i mportant is the choice of a proper extraction metho d depending on the aim of speciation analysis but also dependin g on the analyzed chemical forms of heavy metals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信