中国鸟类分类学和系统发育β多样性的模式和驱动因素因地理背景和扩散能力而异。

IF 4 1区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Jian-Chao Liang, Zhi-Feng Ding, Chun-Lin Li, Yi-Ming Hu, Zhi-Xin Zhou, Gan-Wen Lie, Xiao-Nan Niu, Wen-Bin Huang, Hui-Jian Hu, Xing-Feng Si
{"title":"中国鸟类分类学和系统发育β多样性的模式和驱动因素因地理背景和扩散能力而异。","authors":"Jian-Chao Liang, Zhi-Feng Ding, Chun-Lin Li, Yi-Ming Hu, Zhi-Xin Zhou, Gan-Wen Lie, Xiao-Nan Niu, Wen-Bin Huang, Hui-Jian Hu, Xing-Feng Si","doi":"10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Geographical background and dispersal ability may strongly influence assemblage dissimilarity; however, these aspects have generally been overlooked in previous large-scale beta diversity studies. Here, we examined whether the patterns and drivers of taxonomic beta diversity (TBD) and phylogenetic beta diversity (PBD) of breeding birds in China vary across (1) regions on both sides of the Hu Line, which demarcates China's topographical, climatic, economic, and social patterns, and (2) species with different dispersal ability. TBD and PBD were calculated and partitioned into turnover and nestedness components using a moving window approach. Variables representing climate, habitat heterogeneity, and habitat quality were employed to evaluate the effects of environmental filtering. Spatial distance was considered to assess the impact of dispersal limitation. Variance partitioning analysis was applied to assess the relative roles of these variables. In general, the values of TBD and PBD were high in mountainous areas and were largely determined by environmental filtering. However, different dominant environmental filters on either side of the Hu Line led to divergent beta diversity patterns. Specifically, climate-driven species turnover and habitat heterogeneity-related species nestedness dominated the regions east and west of the line, respectively. Additionally, bird species with stronger dispersal ability were more susceptible to environmental filtering, resulting in more homogeneous assemblages. Our results indicated that regions with distinctive geographical backgrounds may present different ecological factors that lead to divergent assemblage dissimilarity patterns, and dispersal ability determines the response of assemblages to these ecological factors. Identifying a single universal explanation for the observed pattern without considering these aspects may lead to simplistic or incomplete conclusions. Consequently, a comprehensive understanding of large-scale beta diversity patterns and effective planning of conservation strategies necessitate the consideration of both geographical background and species dispersal ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48636,"journal":{"name":"Zoological Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"125-135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10839669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns and drivers of avian taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity in China vary across geographical backgrounds and dispersal abilities.\",\"authors\":\"Jian-Chao Liang, Zhi-Feng Ding, Chun-Lin Li, Yi-Ming Hu, Zhi-Xin Zhou, Gan-Wen Lie, Xiao-Nan Niu, Wen-Bin Huang, Hui-Jian Hu, Xing-Feng Si\",\"doi\":\"10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Geographical background and dispersal ability may strongly influence assemblage dissimilarity; however, these aspects have generally been overlooked in previous large-scale beta diversity studies. Here, we examined whether the patterns and drivers of taxonomic beta diversity (TBD) and phylogenetic beta diversity (PBD) of breeding birds in China vary across (1) regions on both sides of the Hu Line, which demarcates China's topographical, climatic, economic, and social patterns, and (2) species with different dispersal ability. TBD and PBD were calculated and partitioned into turnover and nestedness components using a moving window approach. Variables representing climate, habitat heterogeneity, and habitat quality were employed to evaluate the effects of environmental filtering. Spatial distance was considered to assess the impact of dispersal limitation. Variance partitioning analysis was applied to assess the relative roles of these variables. In general, the values of TBD and PBD were high in mountainous areas and were largely determined by environmental filtering. However, different dominant environmental filters on either side of the Hu Line led to divergent beta diversity patterns. Specifically, climate-driven species turnover and habitat heterogeneity-related species nestedness dominated the regions east and west of the line, respectively. Additionally, bird species with stronger dispersal ability were more susceptible to environmental filtering, resulting in more homogeneous assemblages. Our results indicated that regions with distinctive geographical backgrounds may present different ecological factors that lead to divergent assemblage dissimilarity patterns, and dispersal ability determines the response of assemblages to these ecological factors. Identifying a single universal explanation for the observed pattern without considering these aspects may lead to simplistic or incomplete conclusions. Consequently, a comprehensive understanding of large-scale beta diversity patterns and effective planning of conservation strategies necessitate the consideration of both geographical background and species dispersal ability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoological Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"125-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10839669/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.076\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoological Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地理背景和扩散能力可能会严重影响集合的相似性;然而,在以往的大规模贝塔多样性研究中,这些方面通常被忽视。在此,我们研究了中国繁殖鸟类的分类学贝塔多样性(TBD)和系统发育贝塔多样性(PBD)的模式和驱动因素在以下两种情况下是否存在差异:(1)沪宁线两侧地区,该线划分了中国的地形、气候、经济和社会模式;(2)具有不同扩散能力的物种。采用移动窗口法计算 TBD 和 PBD,并将其划分为周转率和嵌套率两个部分。采用代表气候、生境异质性和生境质量的变量来评估环境过滤的影响。考虑了空间距离以评估扩散限制的影响。应用方差分析来评估这些变量的相对作用。一般来说,山区的 TBD 和 PBD 值较高,主要由环境过滤决定。然而,胡焕庸线两侧不同的主导环境过滤器导致了不同的贝塔多样性模式。具体而言,气候驱动的物种更替和与生境异质性相关的物种嵌套分别在胡焕庸线以东和以西地区占主导地位。此外,具有较强扩散能力的鸟类物种更容易受到环境过滤的影响,从而导致更均匀的物种组合。我们的研究结果表明,不同地理背景的地区可能存在不同的生态因素,导致不同的集合差异模式,而扩散能力决定了集合对这些生态因素的反应。如果不考虑这些方面的因素,只对观察到的模式进行单一的普遍解释,可能会导致简单化或不完整的结论。因此,要全面了解大规模贝塔多样性模式并有效规划保护战略,就必须同时考虑地理背景和物种扩散能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns and drivers of avian taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity in China vary across geographical backgrounds and dispersal abilities.

Geographical background and dispersal ability may strongly influence assemblage dissimilarity; however, these aspects have generally been overlooked in previous large-scale beta diversity studies. Here, we examined whether the patterns and drivers of taxonomic beta diversity (TBD) and phylogenetic beta diversity (PBD) of breeding birds in China vary across (1) regions on both sides of the Hu Line, which demarcates China's topographical, climatic, economic, and social patterns, and (2) species with different dispersal ability. TBD and PBD were calculated and partitioned into turnover and nestedness components using a moving window approach. Variables representing climate, habitat heterogeneity, and habitat quality were employed to evaluate the effects of environmental filtering. Spatial distance was considered to assess the impact of dispersal limitation. Variance partitioning analysis was applied to assess the relative roles of these variables. In general, the values of TBD and PBD were high in mountainous areas and were largely determined by environmental filtering. However, different dominant environmental filters on either side of the Hu Line led to divergent beta diversity patterns. Specifically, climate-driven species turnover and habitat heterogeneity-related species nestedness dominated the regions east and west of the line, respectively. Additionally, bird species with stronger dispersal ability were more susceptible to environmental filtering, resulting in more homogeneous assemblages. Our results indicated that regions with distinctive geographical backgrounds may present different ecological factors that lead to divergent assemblage dissimilarity patterns, and dispersal ability determines the response of assemblages to these ecological factors. Identifying a single universal explanation for the observed pattern without considering these aspects may lead to simplistic or incomplete conclusions. Consequently, a comprehensive understanding of large-scale beta diversity patterns and effective planning of conservation strategies necessitate the consideration of both geographical background and species dispersal ability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zoological Research
Zoological Research Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
1937
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1980, Zoological Research (ZR) is a bimonthly publication produced by Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the China Zoological Society. It publishes peer-reviewed original research article/review/report/note/letter to the editor/editorial in English on Primates and Animal Models, Conservation and Utilization of Animal Resources, and Animal Diversity and Evolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信