绿色经济背景下女性在劳动力市场上的不平等

IF 0.3 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Temida Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/tem2203251o
Ivana Ostojic, M. Maksimović, Sanja Stojković-Zlatanović
{"title":"绿色经济背景下女性在劳动力市场上的不平等","authors":"Ivana Ostojic, M. Maksimović, Sanja Stojković-Zlatanović","doi":"10.2298/tem2203251o","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Society and economies face the necessity of social, political and, consequently, legal addressing of discrimination based on different personal characteristics, such as gender, race, language, political opinion, national origin, and ethnic and social status. In this regard, it is possible to look at, especially from the conceptual-theoretical, as well as the accompanying applicative aspect, and give a conceptual demarcation of (gender) equality in relation to the institute of women?s inequality as an established vulnerable category in workplaces. For many years throughout history in traditional and patriarchal societies, women had a subordinate position with an emphasis on the dominance of the paternalistic concept of man?s position in the world of work. However, in the last decade, as more is being written, spoken, and more research is being conducted on the subject of discrimination at work, efforts have been made to solve this problem. The latest trends related to the transition to a green economy also aim to promote the importance and necessity of mitigating factual inequality between the sexes with legal measures deriving from the principle of equal opportunities and procedures in employment and work. The subject of this analysis is an overview of gender inequalities in the labour market, Norway, Slovenia and Serbia, which were taken as examples of good practices in the period from 2015 to 2021. The comparison is made with a focus on the current concept of promoting a green economy and sustainable development. The goal of the paper is to determine whether the green economy is a chance to alleviate inequality and increase equality in the labour market, or whether it carries limitations that can hardly be overcome when it comes to the world of work.","PeriodicalId":41858,"journal":{"name":"Temida","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequality of women in the labor market in the context of the green economy\",\"authors\":\"Ivana Ostojic, M. Maksimović, Sanja Stojković-Zlatanović\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/tem2203251o\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Society and economies face the necessity of social, political and, consequently, legal addressing of discrimination based on different personal characteristics, such as gender, race, language, political opinion, national origin, and ethnic and social status. In this regard, it is possible to look at, especially from the conceptual-theoretical, as well as the accompanying applicative aspect, and give a conceptual demarcation of (gender) equality in relation to the institute of women?s inequality as an established vulnerable category in workplaces. For many years throughout history in traditional and patriarchal societies, women had a subordinate position with an emphasis on the dominance of the paternalistic concept of man?s position in the world of work. However, in the last decade, as more is being written, spoken, and more research is being conducted on the subject of discrimination at work, efforts have been made to solve this problem. The latest trends related to the transition to a green economy also aim to promote the importance and necessity of mitigating factual inequality between the sexes with legal measures deriving from the principle of equal opportunities and procedures in employment and work. The subject of this analysis is an overview of gender inequalities in the labour market, Norway, Slovenia and Serbia, which were taken as examples of good practices in the period from 2015 to 2021. The comparison is made with a focus on the current concept of promoting a green economy and sustainable development. The goal of the paper is to determine whether the green economy is a chance to alleviate inequality and increase equality in the labour market, or whether it carries limitations that can hardly be overcome when it comes to the world of work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Temida\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Temida\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/tem2203251o\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/tem2203251o","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会和经济面临着社会、政治和法律解决基于不同个人特征的歧视的必要性,如性别、种族、语言、政治观点、国籍、民族和社会地位。在这方面,有可能特别是从概念-理论以及相应的应用方面来看待,并在与妇女研究所有关的(性别)平等问题上给出一个概念性界定。美国将不平等视为工作场所的既定弱势群体。在历史上的许多年里,在传统和父权社会中,女性处于从属地位,强调家长式的男性观念的主导地位。美国在职场的地位。然而,在过去的十年中,随着越来越多的关于工作中的歧视问题的书面,口头和更多的研究进行,已经做出了努力来解决这个问题。与向绿色经济过渡有关的最新趋势还旨在促进通过从就业和工作方面的平等机会和程序原则出发的法律措施来减轻两性之间事实上的不平等的重要性和必要性。本次分析的主题是对劳动力市场、挪威、斯洛文尼亚和塞尔维亚的性别不平等的概述,这些国家被作为2015年至2021年期间良好做法的范例。比较的重点是当前推动绿色经济和可持续发展的理念。这篇论文的目标是确定绿色经济是一个缓解劳动力市场不平等和增加平等的机会,还是它在工作世界中存在难以克服的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inequality of women in the labor market in the context of the green economy
Society and economies face the necessity of social, political and, consequently, legal addressing of discrimination based on different personal characteristics, such as gender, race, language, political opinion, national origin, and ethnic and social status. In this regard, it is possible to look at, especially from the conceptual-theoretical, as well as the accompanying applicative aspect, and give a conceptual demarcation of (gender) equality in relation to the institute of women?s inequality as an established vulnerable category in workplaces. For many years throughout history in traditional and patriarchal societies, women had a subordinate position with an emphasis on the dominance of the paternalistic concept of man?s position in the world of work. However, in the last decade, as more is being written, spoken, and more research is being conducted on the subject of discrimination at work, efforts have been made to solve this problem. The latest trends related to the transition to a green economy also aim to promote the importance and necessity of mitigating factual inequality between the sexes with legal measures deriving from the principle of equal opportunities and procedures in employment and work. The subject of this analysis is an overview of gender inequalities in the labour market, Norway, Slovenia and Serbia, which were taken as examples of good practices in the period from 2015 to 2021. The comparison is made with a focus on the current concept of promoting a green economy and sustainable development. The goal of the paper is to determine whether the green economy is a chance to alleviate inequality and increase equality in the labour market, or whether it carries limitations that can hardly be overcome when it comes to the world of work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Temida
Temida CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信