血清肿瘤标志物对附件肿块的诊断价值

M. Terzic, J. Dotlic, I. Likić, B. Nikolic, N. Brndusić, I. Pilić, J. Bila, S. Maricić, N. Arsenovic
{"title":"血清肿瘤标志物对附件肿块的诊断价值","authors":"M. Terzic, J. Dotlic, I. Likić, B. Nikolic, N. Brndusić, I. Pilić, J. Bila, S. Maricić, N. Arsenovic","doi":"10.2478/s11536-013-0234-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveThe study aim was to investigate the diagnostic value of measuring preoperative serum tumor markers in patients with adnexal masses.MethodsThe study included all (358) consecutive patients treated for adnexal tumors at the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center of Serbia during 12 months. Tumor-marker levels (Ca 125, CEA, HE 4, Ca 19.9 and Ca 15.3) obtained from all women on admission were compared with histopathological findings in cases in which tumors were removed.ResultsWomen with malignant tumors had the highest levels of Ca 125, CEA and HE 4 (p<0.01). Mucinous adenocarcinoma produced the highest amounts of Ca 19.9 and CEA. Ca 15.3 was the highest in women with endometrioid carcinoma. There were no significant differences in the levels of all serum tumor markers between women with benign and borderline tumors (p>0.05). Malignant forms of tumors were well indicated by Ca 125, HE 4 and Ca 15.3 levels. The combination of Ca 125 and HE 4 resulted in the highest sensitivity, specificity, and positive or negative predictive value (91.04%, 87.6%, 67.9%, 77.2%, respectively).ConclusionsBlood levels of tumor markers can be effective? predictors of the nature of adnexal masses. For the most precise evaluation, a combination of serum tumor markers should be used.","PeriodicalId":50709,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2478/s11536-013-0234-x","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of serum tumor markers for adnexal masses\",\"authors\":\"M. Terzic, J. Dotlic, I. Likić, B. Nikolic, N. Brndusić, I. Pilić, J. Bila, S. Maricić, N. Arsenovic\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/s11536-013-0234-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveThe study aim was to investigate the diagnostic value of measuring preoperative serum tumor markers in patients with adnexal masses.MethodsThe study included all (358) consecutive patients treated for adnexal tumors at the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center of Serbia during 12 months. Tumor-marker levels (Ca 125, CEA, HE 4, Ca 19.9 and Ca 15.3) obtained from all women on admission were compared with histopathological findings in cases in which tumors were removed.ResultsWomen with malignant tumors had the highest levels of Ca 125, CEA and HE 4 (p<0.01). Mucinous adenocarcinoma produced the highest amounts of Ca 19.9 and CEA. Ca 15.3 was the highest in women with endometrioid carcinoma. There were no significant differences in the levels of all serum tumor markers between women with benign and borderline tumors (p>0.05). Malignant forms of tumors were well indicated by Ca 125, HE 4 and Ca 15.3 levels. The combination of Ca 125 and HE 4 resulted in the highest sensitivity, specificity, and positive or negative predictive value (91.04%, 87.6%, 67.9%, 77.2%, respectively).ConclusionsBlood levels of tumor markers can be effective? predictors of the nature of adnexal masses. For the most precise evaluation, a combination of serum tumor markers should be used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2478/s11536-013-0234-x\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-013-0234-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-013-0234-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的探讨术前血清肿瘤标志物测定对附件肿物的诊断价值。方法在塞尔维亚临床中心妇产科门诊连续12个月接受附件肿瘤治疗的358例患者为研究对象。将入院时所有女性的肿瘤标志物水平(Ca 125、CEA、HE 4、Ca 19.9和Ca 15.3)与肿瘤切除病例的组织病理学结果进行比较。结果恶性肿瘤患者Ca 125、CEA、HE 4水平最高(p0.05)。Ca 125、HE 4和Ca 15.3水平能很好地指示肿瘤的恶性形式。Ca 125联合HE 4的敏感性、特异性和阳性或阴性预测值最高(分别为91.04%、87.6%、67.9%、77.2%)。结论血药浓度对肿瘤标志物的影响?附件肿块性质的预测因子。为了获得最精确的评估,应结合使用血清肿瘤标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic value of serum tumor markers for adnexal masses
ObjectiveThe study aim was to investigate the diagnostic value of measuring preoperative serum tumor markers in patients with adnexal masses.MethodsThe study included all (358) consecutive patients treated for adnexal tumors at the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center of Serbia during 12 months. Tumor-marker levels (Ca 125, CEA, HE 4, Ca 19.9 and Ca 15.3) obtained from all women on admission were compared with histopathological findings in cases in which tumors were removed.ResultsWomen with malignant tumors had the highest levels of Ca 125, CEA and HE 4 (p<0.01). Mucinous adenocarcinoma produced the highest amounts of Ca 19.9 and CEA. Ca 15.3 was the highest in women with endometrioid carcinoma. There were no significant differences in the levels of all serum tumor markers between women with benign and borderline tumors (p>0.05). Malignant forms of tumors were well indicated by Ca 125, HE 4 and Ca 15.3 levels. The combination of Ca 125 and HE 4 resulted in the highest sensitivity, specificity, and positive or negative predictive value (91.04%, 87.6%, 67.9%, 77.2%, respectively).ConclusionsBlood levels of tumor markers can be effective? predictors of the nature of adnexal masses. For the most precise evaluation, a combination of serum tumor markers should be used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Medicine
Central European Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信