《战地医生:双重忠诚的挑战

Michael Davis
{"title":"《战地医生:双重忠诚的挑战","authors":"Michael Davis","doi":"10.2202/1941-6008.1072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":", Fritz Allhoff, Ed. (Springer, 2008). Reviewed by Michael Davis As a military physician was getting into an ambulance to attend to the wounded at a firefight near Bagdad, a line officer asked her to report by radio any suspicious activity she saw: “The enemy is always setting bombs along that road. The more we spot, the fewer of our guys you’ll have to patch up.” As a member of the military, the physician should, it seems, agree to help protect “our guys”. But, as a physician in a vehicle marked with a red cross, shouldn’t she decline? Physicians are supposed to be physicians, not forward observation posts. Her loyalty to the military seems to clash with her loyalty to her profession. That is the subject of this collection of original essays, the so-called “problem of the dual loyalty of military physicians”.","PeriodicalId":88318,"journal":{"name":"Studies in ethics, law, and technology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1941-6008.1072","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Physicians at War: The Dual-Loyalties Challenge\",\"authors\":\"Michael Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1941-6008.1072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\", Fritz Allhoff, Ed. (Springer, 2008). Reviewed by Michael Davis As a military physician was getting into an ambulance to attend to the wounded at a firefight near Bagdad, a line officer asked her to report by radio any suspicious activity she saw: “The enemy is always setting bombs along that road. The more we spot, the fewer of our guys you’ll have to patch up.” As a member of the military, the physician should, it seems, agree to help protect “our guys”. But, as a physician in a vehicle marked with a red cross, shouldn’t she decline? Physicians are supposed to be physicians, not forward observation posts. Her loyalty to the military seems to clash with her loyalty to her profession. That is the subject of this collection of original essays, the so-called “problem of the dual loyalty of military physicians”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in ethics, law, and technology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1941-6008.1072\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in ethics, law, and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in ethics, law, and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

弗里茨·奥尔霍夫,埃德(bbbb10, 2008)。在巴格达附近的一次交火中,一名军医正坐上一辆救护车去救治伤员,一名前线军官让她用无线电报告她看到的任何可疑活动:“敌人总是在那条路上安放炸弹。我们发现的人越多,你需要修补的人就越少。”作为军队的一员,医生似乎应该同意帮助保护“我们的人”。但是,作为一名坐在标有红十字标志的车辆里的医生,她不应该拒绝吗?医生应该是医生,而不是前线观察哨。她对军队的忠诚似乎与她对职业的忠诚相冲突。这就是这本文集的主题,即所谓的“军医的双重忠诚问题”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Physicians at War: The Dual-Loyalties Challenge
, Fritz Allhoff, Ed. (Springer, 2008). Reviewed by Michael Davis As a military physician was getting into an ambulance to attend to the wounded at a firefight near Bagdad, a line officer asked her to report by radio any suspicious activity she saw: “The enemy is always setting bombs along that road. The more we spot, the fewer of our guys you’ll have to patch up.” As a member of the military, the physician should, it seems, agree to help protect “our guys”. But, as a physician in a vehicle marked with a red cross, shouldn’t she decline? Physicians are supposed to be physicians, not forward observation posts. Her loyalty to the military seems to clash with her loyalty to her profession. That is the subject of this collection of original essays, the so-called “problem of the dual loyalty of military physicians”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信