民粹主义能否以及如何成为左翼复兴的新战略?

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Sociologija Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2298/soc2003330v
M. Višić
{"title":"民粹主义能否以及如何成为左翼复兴的新战略?","authors":"M. Višić","doi":"10.2298/soc2003330v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I start with the question of whether populism can be a strategy for renewing the Left. I argue that populism has such potential if: a) it is used for bringing together ?scattered consciousnesses?, b) if it advocates and goes in the direction of radical reform, c) if it is accompanied by minutely pre-defined reform policies, and most importantly d) if the Left manages to bridge populism?s inherent gap between the promised and the fulfilled. Among the various definitions of populism discussed at the outset of the text, I choose to use one that defines populism as a discursive-rhetorical style and technique of doing politics. I offer six antitheses that could be considered to have contributed to the fall of the Left. The focus then shifts to the success and failure of the Third Way, which I interpret as a collection of ideologemes, phrases, and floating signifiers used for new populist rhetoric. I then seek to demonstrate what Le Bon?s Psychology of the Crowd - in which important topics about populism are discussed - has to say about the psychology of populism and the mechanisms of acceptance of populist rhetoric, and whether it contains any useful lessons for the Left. In the last part I propose six theses and discuss populism as a strategy for renewing the Left.","PeriodicalId":43515,"journal":{"name":"Sociologija","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can populism and how be a new strategy for renewing the left?\",\"authors\":\"M. Višić\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/soc2003330v\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I start with the question of whether populism can be a strategy for renewing the Left. I argue that populism has such potential if: a) it is used for bringing together ?scattered consciousnesses?, b) if it advocates and goes in the direction of radical reform, c) if it is accompanied by minutely pre-defined reform policies, and most importantly d) if the Left manages to bridge populism?s inherent gap between the promised and the fulfilled. Among the various definitions of populism discussed at the outset of the text, I choose to use one that defines populism as a discursive-rhetorical style and technique of doing politics. I offer six antitheses that could be considered to have contributed to the fall of the Left. The focus then shifts to the success and failure of the Third Way, which I interpret as a collection of ideologemes, phrases, and floating signifiers used for new populist rhetoric. I then seek to demonstrate what Le Bon?s Psychology of the Crowd - in which important topics about populism are discussed - has to say about the psychology of populism and the mechanisms of acceptance of populist rhetoric, and whether it contains any useful lessons for the Left. In the last part I propose six theses and discuss populism as a strategy for renewing the Left.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociologija\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/soc2003330v\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/soc2003330v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我首先提出的问题是,民粹主义能否成为左翼复兴的一种策略。我认为,民粹主义具有这样的潜力,如果:a)它被用来汇集分散的意识?b)如果它倡导并朝着激进改革的方向发展,c)如果它伴随着细致入微的预先定义的改革政策,最重要的是d)如果左派成功地弥合了民粹主义?承诺与实现之间固有的差距。在本文开头讨论的民粹主义的各种定义中,我选择将民粹主义定义为一种话语修辞风格和政治技巧。我提供了六个可以被认为是导致左派衰落的对立面。然后焦点转移到第三条道路的成功和失败,我将其解释为用于新民粹主义修辞的意识形态,短语和浮动能指的集合。然后我试图证明勒邦?《群众心理学》(Psychology of the Crowd)——其中讨论了关于民粹主义的重要话题——不得不谈到民粹主义的心理和民粹主义言论的接受机制,以及它是否包含了对左派有用的教训。在最后一部分,我提出了六个论点,并讨论了民粹主义作为左翼复兴的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can populism and how be a new strategy for renewing the left?
I start with the question of whether populism can be a strategy for renewing the Left. I argue that populism has such potential if: a) it is used for bringing together ?scattered consciousnesses?, b) if it advocates and goes in the direction of radical reform, c) if it is accompanied by minutely pre-defined reform policies, and most importantly d) if the Left manages to bridge populism?s inherent gap between the promised and the fulfilled. Among the various definitions of populism discussed at the outset of the text, I choose to use one that defines populism as a discursive-rhetorical style and technique of doing politics. I offer six antitheses that could be considered to have contributed to the fall of the Left. The focus then shifts to the success and failure of the Third Way, which I interpret as a collection of ideologemes, phrases, and floating signifiers used for new populist rhetoric. I then seek to demonstrate what Le Bon?s Psychology of the Crowd - in which important topics about populism are discussed - has to say about the psychology of populism and the mechanisms of acceptance of populist rhetoric, and whether it contains any useful lessons for the Left. In the last part I propose six theses and discuss populism as a strategy for renewing the Left.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologija
Sociologija SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信