走向环境企业家:在纽约恢复公共信任原则

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences
M. Benn
{"title":"走向环境企业家:在纽约恢复公共信任原则","authors":"M. Benn","doi":"10.2307/40041305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The public trust doctrine provides that government holds title to certain lands and waterways in trust for the public benefit and public use. While the common law doctrine varies from state to state, historically it “requires that . . . trust land[s] be accessible and used for a public purpose; that [they] be put to . . . uses appropriate to the resource; and, in some cases, that [they] not be sold.” It does not, however, foreclose the private lease and license of public lands; rather, it requires that such lands be utilized primarily for the public benefit, and only incidentally for private benefit. Thus, fundamentally, the public trust doctrine incorporates a public use test. The New York public trust doctrine, as it applies to public parkland, has nebulously defined “public benefit” and “public use” as a “park,” in contrast to a “non-park,” use. In this Comment, I argue for","PeriodicalId":48012,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","volume":"155 1","pages":"203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40041305","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Environmental Entrepreneurship: Restoring the Public Trust Doctrine in New York\",\"authors\":\"M. Benn\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40041305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The public trust doctrine provides that government holds title to certain lands and waterways in trust for the public benefit and public use. While the common law doctrine varies from state to state, historically it “requires that . . . trust land[s] be accessible and used for a public purpose; that [they] be put to . . . uses appropriate to the resource; and, in some cases, that [they] not be sold.” It does not, however, foreclose the private lease and license of public lands; rather, it requires that such lands be utilized primarily for the public benefit, and only incidentally for private benefit. Thus, fundamentally, the public trust doctrine incorporates a public use test. The New York public trust doctrine, as it applies to public parkland, has nebulously defined “public benefit” and “public use” as a “park,” in contrast to a “non-park,” use. In this Comment, I argue for\",\"PeriodicalId\":48012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40041305\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40041305\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40041305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

公共信托原则规定,为了公共利益和公共使用,政府托管某些土地和水道的所有权。虽然普通法原则因州而异,但从历史上看,它“要求……信托土地可进入并用于公共目的;(他们)被置于……使用适当的资源;而且,在某些情况下,他们不会被出售。”然而,它并不取消公共土地的私人租赁和许可证;相反,它要求这些土地主要用于公共利益,只有偶然用于私人利益。因此,从根本上说,公共信托原则包含了公共使用测试。纽约公共信托原则在适用于公共公园用地时,将“公共利益”和“公共使用”模糊地定义为“公园”,而不是“非公园”使用。在这篇评论中,我认为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Environmental Entrepreneurship: Restoring the Public Trust Doctrine in New York
The public trust doctrine provides that government holds title to certain lands and waterways in trust for the public benefit and public use. While the common law doctrine varies from state to state, historically it “requires that . . . trust land[s] be accessible and used for a public purpose; that [they] be put to . . . uses appropriate to the resource; and, in some cases, that [they] not be sold.” It does not, however, foreclose the private lease and license of public lands; rather, it requires that such lands be utilized primarily for the public benefit, and only incidentally for private benefit. Thus, fundamentally, the public trust doctrine incorporates a public use test. The New York public trust doctrine, as it applies to public parkland, has nebulously defined “public benefit” and “public use” as a “park,” in contrast to a “non-park,” use. In this Comment, I argue for
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信