他们被摩托车系统和直升机武装并持有偏见。

Hatice Kübra ECEMİŞ YILMAZ
{"title":"他们被摩托车系统和直升机武装并持有偏见。","authors":"Hatice Kübra ECEMİŞ YILMAZ","doi":"10.21492/inuhfd.1253060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomous weapon systems (AWS) present a formidable obstacle to the application of just war theory in international law. While just war theory has long served as a framework for assessing the moral and legal justification of armed conflict, the lack of human control over the use of force in AWS creates unique ethical and legal challenges. This article investigates the effects of AWS on just war theory in international law, including the application of jus ad bellum and jus in bello criteria. It discusses the benefits and drawbacks of AWS, the current legal framework for these systems, and the difficulties associated with applying just war theory criteria to AWS. The article concludes with recommendations for future research and policy development to address these challenges, including the need for additional research, the development of clear legal frameworks, international cooperation and coordination, public participation and awareness, and research on alternative approaches to the use of AWS in armed conflict. By addressing these concerns, researchers can work toward a future in which the development and use of AWS are consistent with the principles of the just war theory and international law.","PeriodicalId":33475,"journal":{"name":"Inonu Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OTONOM SİLAH SİSTEMLERİ VE HAKLI SAVAŞ TEORİSİ ZORLUKLAR VE ÖNERİLER\",\"authors\":\"Hatice Kübra ECEMİŞ YILMAZ\",\"doi\":\"10.21492/inuhfd.1253060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Autonomous weapon systems (AWS) present a formidable obstacle to the application of just war theory in international law. While just war theory has long served as a framework for assessing the moral and legal justification of armed conflict, the lack of human control over the use of force in AWS creates unique ethical and legal challenges. This article investigates the effects of AWS on just war theory in international law, including the application of jus ad bellum and jus in bello criteria. It discusses the benefits and drawbacks of AWS, the current legal framework for these systems, and the difficulties associated with applying just war theory criteria to AWS. The article concludes with recommendations for future research and policy development to address these challenges, including the need for additional research, the development of clear legal frameworks, international cooperation and coordination, public participation and awareness, and research on alternative approaches to the use of AWS in armed conflict. By addressing these concerns, researchers can work toward a future in which the development and use of AWS are consistent with the principles of the just war theory and international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inonu Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inonu Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21492/inuhfd.1253060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inonu Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21492/inuhfd.1253060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自主武器系统对正义战争理论在国际法中的应用构成了巨大障碍。虽然正义战争理论长期以来一直是评估武装冲突的道德和法律正当性的框架,但在AWS中缺乏对武力使用的人类控制,造成了独特的道德和法律挑战。本文探讨了国际法对正义战争理论的影响,包括战时法和战时法标准的适用。它讨论了AWS的优点和缺点,这些系统的现行法律框架,以及将正义战争理论标准应用于AWS的困难。文章最后对未来的研究和政策制定提出了建议,以应对这些挑战,包括需要进行更多的研究,制定明确的法律框架,国际合作与协调,公众参与和意识,以及研究在武装冲突中使用AWS的替代方法。通过解决这些问题,研究人员可以朝着一个未来的方向努力,在这个未来中,AWS的发展和使用符合正义战争理论和国际法的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OTONOM SİLAH SİSTEMLERİ VE HAKLI SAVAŞ TEORİSİ ZORLUKLAR VE ÖNERİLER
Autonomous weapon systems (AWS) present a formidable obstacle to the application of just war theory in international law. While just war theory has long served as a framework for assessing the moral and legal justification of armed conflict, the lack of human control over the use of force in AWS creates unique ethical and legal challenges. This article investigates the effects of AWS on just war theory in international law, including the application of jus ad bellum and jus in bello criteria. It discusses the benefits and drawbacks of AWS, the current legal framework for these systems, and the difficulties associated with applying just war theory criteria to AWS. The article concludes with recommendations for future research and policy development to address these challenges, including the need for additional research, the development of clear legal frameworks, international cooperation and coordination, public participation and awareness, and research on alternative approaches to the use of AWS in armed conflict. By addressing these concerns, researchers can work toward a future in which the development and use of AWS are consistent with the principles of the just war theory and international law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信