独立分析ILS和INDLS星表的γδ数据,获得明亮Gaia DR2参考系的自旋

IF 0.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
G. Damljanovic, M. Stojanovic, J. Aleksic
{"title":"独立分析ILS和INDLS星表的γδ数据,获得明亮Gaia DR2参考系的自旋","authors":"G. Damljanovic, M. Stojanovic, J. Aleksic","doi":"10.2298/saj210428002d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Gaia DR2 reference frame should be without relative rotation to the quasars (QSOs) and consistent with the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS). For the faint part of DR2 (stars with Gaia magnitude G ? 16) that task was done via Gaia's observations of QSOs (G ? 17 mag), but the bright DR2 (G ? 13 mag) is difficult to validate and it rotates relative to the faint DR2 at rate of the order of 0.1 mas/yr. Very bright DR2 stars (G ? 6 mag) mostly have inferior astrometry. Here, the aim is to determine two spin components (?X and ?Y) of the bright DR2 using International Latitude Service (ILS, for 387 stars) and independent latitude stations (INDLS, for 682 stars) catalogs of proper motion in declination ??; both are referred to the Hipparcos reference frame and their stars are mostly from 4 to 8 mag in the V-band (critical part of DR2). Also, using the new Hipparcos (NHIP) values ?? for ILS and INDLS stars, we can see that the merit of the ILS and INDLS is the long time baseline (?t ? 90 years) important for ?? because the standard deviation of ?? is opposite to ?t. Applying the least squares method (LSM) to the differences of ?? between two catalogs (ILS-DR2, INDLS-DR2, etc.), our results support the mentioned spin. The 3? criterion and Tukey's fences method were used to reject some stars, the Abbe criterion to explain the variability in ILS-DR2 and other ?? differences, and the Shapiro-Wilk test to check the standard distribution of differences. The obtained ?Y is significant at the 2 ? level, and the ILS and INDLS catalogs could be useful for validation of the bright reference frame of Gaia DR2.","PeriodicalId":48878,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Astronomical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independent analysis of γδ data of ILS and INDLS catalogs to obtain the spin of the bright Gaia DR2 reference frame\",\"authors\":\"G. Damljanovic, M. Stojanovic, J. Aleksic\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/saj210428002d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Gaia DR2 reference frame should be without relative rotation to the quasars (QSOs) and consistent with the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS). For the faint part of DR2 (stars with Gaia magnitude G ? 16) that task was done via Gaia's observations of QSOs (G ? 17 mag), but the bright DR2 (G ? 13 mag) is difficult to validate and it rotates relative to the faint DR2 at rate of the order of 0.1 mas/yr. Very bright DR2 stars (G ? 6 mag) mostly have inferior astrometry. Here, the aim is to determine two spin components (?X and ?Y) of the bright DR2 using International Latitude Service (ILS, for 387 stars) and independent latitude stations (INDLS, for 682 stars) catalogs of proper motion in declination ??; both are referred to the Hipparcos reference frame and their stars are mostly from 4 to 8 mag in the V-band (critical part of DR2). Also, using the new Hipparcos (NHIP) values ?? for ILS and INDLS stars, we can see that the merit of the ILS and INDLS is the long time baseline (?t ? 90 years) important for ?? because the standard deviation of ?? is opposite to ?t. Applying the least squares method (LSM) to the differences of ?? between two catalogs (ILS-DR2, INDLS-DR2, etc.), our results support the mentioned spin. The 3? criterion and Tukey's fences method were used to reject some stars, the Abbe criterion to explain the variability in ILS-DR2 and other ?? differences, and the Shapiro-Wilk test to check the standard distribution of differences. The obtained ?Y is significant at the 2 ? level, and the ILS and INDLS catalogs could be useful for validation of the bright reference frame of Gaia DR2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serbian Astronomical Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serbian Astronomical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/saj210428002d\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Astronomical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/saj210428002d","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

盖亚DR2参考系应该与类星体(qso)没有相对旋转,并与国际天体参考系(ICRS)保持一致。DR2的暗淡部分(盖亚星等G ?16)该任务是通过盖亚对qso (G ?17等),但明亮的DR2 (G ?13等)很难验证,它相对于暗淡的DR2以0.1 mas/yr的速率旋转。非常明亮的DR2星(G ?6等)大多有较差的天文测量。这里的目标是确定两个自旋分量(?利用国际纬度服务(ILS, 387颗星)和独立纬度站(INDLS, 682颗星)的赤纬表对明亮DR2的X和Y进行测量;这两个星系都是依巴谷参考系,它们的恒星大多在4到8等的v波段(DR2的关键部分)。此外,使用新的hiparcos (NHIP)值??对于ILS和INDLS恒星,我们可以看到,ILS和INDLS的优点是长时间基线(?t ?90年)对??因为标准差??是?t的反义词。将最小二乘法(LSM)应用于??在两个星表(ILS-DR2, INDLS-DR2等)之间,我们的结果支持上述自旋。3吗?标准和Tukey's fences方法被用来拒绝一些恒星,Abbe标准被用来解释il - dr2和其他??用夏皮罗-威尔克检验检验差异的标准分布。得到的?Y在2 ?因此,对Gaia DR2的明亮参考系的验证,可以使用ILS和INDLS星表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Independent analysis of γδ data of ILS and INDLS catalogs to obtain the spin of the bright Gaia DR2 reference frame
The Gaia DR2 reference frame should be without relative rotation to the quasars (QSOs) and consistent with the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS). For the faint part of DR2 (stars with Gaia magnitude G ? 16) that task was done via Gaia's observations of QSOs (G ? 17 mag), but the bright DR2 (G ? 13 mag) is difficult to validate and it rotates relative to the faint DR2 at rate of the order of 0.1 mas/yr. Very bright DR2 stars (G ? 6 mag) mostly have inferior astrometry. Here, the aim is to determine two spin components (?X and ?Y) of the bright DR2 using International Latitude Service (ILS, for 387 stars) and independent latitude stations (INDLS, for 682 stars) catalogs of proper motion in declination ??; both are referred to the Hipparcos reference frame and their stars are mostly from 4 to 8 mag in the V-band (critical part of DR2). Also, using the new Hipparcos (NHIP) values ?? for ILS and INDLS stars, we can see that the merit of the ILS and INDLS is the long time baseline (?t ? 90 years) important for ?? because the standard deviation of ?? is opposite to ?t. Applying the least squares method (LSM) to the differences of ?? between two catalogs (ILS-DR2, INDLS-DR2, etc.), our results support the mentioned spin. The 3? criterion and Tukey's fences method were used to reject some stars, the Abbe criterion to explain the variability in ILS-DR2 and other ?? differences, and the Shapiro-Wilk test to check the standard distribution of differences. The obtained ?Y is significant at the 2 ? level, and the ILS and INDLS catalogs could be useful for validation of the bright reference frame of Gaia DR2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Serbian Astronomical Journal
Serbian Astronomical Journal ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Serbian Astronomical Journal publishes original observations and researches in all branches of astronomy. The journal publishes: Invited Reviews - review article on some up-to-date topic in astronomy, astrophysics and related fields (written upon invitation only), Original Scientific Papers - article in which are presented previously unpublished author''s own scientific results, Preliminary Reports - original scientific paper, but shorter in length and of preliminary nature, Professional Papers - articles offering experience useful for the improvement of professional practice i.e. article describing methods and techniques, software, presenting observational data, etc. In some cases the journal may publish other contributions, such as In Memoriam notes, Obituaries, Book Reviews, as well as Editorials, Addenda, Errata, Corrigenda, Retraction notes, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信