俄罗斯完美主义者样本中的智力、道德和世界内隐理论

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psihologija Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/psi210525011r
Natalia Rudnova, M. Sheveleva, T. Permyakova
{"title":"俄罗斯完美主义者样本中的智力、道德和世界内隐理论","authors":"Natalia Rudnova, M. Sheveleva, T. Permyakova","doi":"10.2298/psi210525011r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main goal of the current study is to examine differences across perfectionists? profiles regarding implicit theories of intelligence, morality and the world. The sample included 202 Russian students, age-range 18?24 (M = 19.62, SD = 1.15), 40% male. Short Almost Perfect Scale and Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Morality, and the World Questionnaire was used for data collection. Correlation and regression analysis, latent profile analysis, and the Student's t-test were conducted. The study results show that adaptive perfectionists tend to hold the entity theory about the world and the incremental theory of intelligence. The world for them is a structured place with fixed rules in which they can improve their cognitive skills, correct mistakes and grow up in experiences. Maladaptive perfectionists tend to hold only the entity theory of morality, so they believe in rigid moral principles. Non-perfectionists tend to hold the entity theory of intelligence and incremental theory of morality and the world. They believe that intelligence has limits, the world is a chaotic and unexpected place and morality is fluid and unstable. The findings are presented in the context of defining the differences between three types of perfectionists in terms of their views on the ability to modify cognitive capabilities, moral principles, and the world in general.","PeriodicalId":45301,"journal":{"name":"Psihologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implicit theories of intelligence, morality, and the world in a sample of Russian perfectionists\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Rudnova, M. Sheveleva, T. Permyakova\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/psi210525011r\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main goal of the current study is to examine differences across perfectionists? profiles regarding implicit theories of intelligence, morality and the world. The sample included 202 Russian students, age-range 18?24 (M = 19.62, SD = 1.15), 40% male. Short Almost Perfect Scale and Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Morality, and the World Questionnaire was used for data collection. Correlation and regression analysis, latent profile analysis, and the Student's t-test were conducted. The study results show that adaptive perfectionists tend to hold the entity theory about the world and the incremental theory of intelligence. The world for them is a structured place with fixed rules in which they can improve their cognitive skills, correct mistakes and grow up in experiences. Maladaptive perfectionists tend to hold only the entity theory of morality, so they believe in rigid moral principles. Non-perfectionists tend to hold the entity theory of intelligence and incremental theory of morality and the world. They believe that intelligence has limits, the world is a chaotic and unexpected place and morality is fluid and unstable. The findings are presented in the context of defining the differences between three types of perfectionists in terms of their views on the ability to modify cognitive capabilities, moral principles, and the world in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psihologija\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psihologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/psi210525011r\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/psi210525011r","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前研究的主要目标是检验完美主义者之间的差异。关于智力、道德和世界的内隐理论简介。样本包括202名俄罗斯学生,年龄从18岁到18岁不等。24例(M = 19.62, SD = 1.15),男性占40%。采用短几乎完美量表和内隐智力、道德和世界调查问卷进行数据收集。进行相关回归分析、潜在剖面分析和学生t检验。研究结果表明,适应完美主义者倾向于持有世界实体理论和智力增量理论。对他们来说,世界是一个有组织的地方,有固定的规则,他们可以在其中提高自己的认知技能,纠正错误,并在经验中成长。适应不良的完美主义者倾向于只持有道德的实体理论,所以他们相信严格的道德原则。非完美主义者倾向于持有智力实体论和道德与世界增量论。他们认为智力是有限的,世界是一个混乱和意想不到的地方,道德是流动的和不稳定的。这些发现是在定义三种完美主义者之间的差异的背景下提出的,即他们对改变认知能力、道德原则和整个世界的能力的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implicit theories of intelligence, morality, and the world in a sample of Russian perfectionists
The main goal of the current study is to examine differences across perfectionists? profiles regarding implicit theories of intelligence, morality and the world. The sample included 202 Russian students, age-range 18?24 (M = 19.62, SD = 1.15), 40% male. Short Almost Perfect Scale and Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Morality, and the World Questionnaire was used for data collection. Correlation and regression analysis, latent profile analysis, and the Student's t-test were conducted. The study results show that adaptive perfectionists tend to hold the entity theory about the world and the incremental theory of intelligence. The world for them is a structured place with fixed rules in which they can improve their cognitive skills, correct mistakes and grow up in experiences. Maladaptive perfectionists tend to hold only the entity theory of morality, so they believe in rigid moral principles. Non-perfectionists tend to hold the entity theory of intelligence and incremental theory of morality and the world. They believe that intelligence has limits, the world is a chaotic and unexpected place and morality is fluid and unstable. The findings are presented in the context of defining the differences between three types of perfectionists in terms of their views on the ability to modify cognitive capabilities, moral principles, and the world in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psihologija
Psihologija PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信