多发性硬化症患者的自动注射器偏好和护士在治疗决策中的作用:来自欧洲和美国的一项国际调查的结果

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
E. Verdun di Cantogno, M. Tomlinson, Laure Manuel, K. Thakur
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者的自动注射器偏好和护士在治疗决策中的作用:来自欧洲和美国的一项国际调查的结果","authors":"E. Verdun di Cantogno, M. Tomlinson, Laure Manuel, K. Thakur","doi":"10.2147/POR.S72012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This international survey recorded the opinions of multiple sclerosis (MS) nurses about their role in treatment decision making and about the importance of different attributes of autoinjectors used to deliver first-line parenteral therapy. Methods The survey involved 52 MS nurses in different practice settings in France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA. Nurses described their role in patient education and in treatment decision making. They also rated the importance of nine prespecified attributes of autoinjectors and stated their preference, both overall and by attribute, for one of two autoinjectors used to deliver interferon β-1b (ExtaviPro® 30G and Betacomfort®). Nurses’ preferences were compared with those previously collected from patients using an identical questionnaire. Results There were pronounced differences between practice settings and between countries in the opinions of MS nurses about their influence on treatment decision making. Nurses considered themselves instrumental in helping patients decide between treatment options offered by neurologists. Of the nine autoinjector attributes, nurses rated “reliable to use” as most important, followed by attributes associated with convenience (“easy to operate,” “ergonomic shape,” “reach” [of injection sites], and “one-handed injection”). Nurses’ and patients’ rankings of attributes were closely aligned. For the nine attributes, 74%–98% of nurses preferred ExtaviPro® 30G to Betacomfort®, 94% preferring ExtaviPro® 30G overall. Nurses showed a greater preference than patients for ExtaviPro® 30G with respect to “easy to operate” (92% vs 78%), “intuitive to use” (98% vs 78%), and “attractive design” (98% vs 83%; P<0.05, all), but preference rates were otherwise similar across the two groups. The most common reasons in both groups for preferring ExtaviPro® 30G to Betacomfort® were “easy to use” and “ergonomic shape.” Conclusion MS nurses play a key role in patient guidance and education. Their preferences for ExtaviPro® 30G likely reflect their understanding of the challenges patients face when self-administering treatment.","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"53 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/POR.S72012","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autoinjector preference in multiple sclerosis and the role of nurses in treatment decisions: results from an international survey in Europe and the USA\",\"authors\":\"E. Verdun di Cantogno, M. Tomlinson, Laure Manuel, K. Thakur\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/POR.S72012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This international survey recorded the opinions of multiple sclerosis (MS) nurses about their role in treatment decision making and about the importance of different attributes of autoinjectors used to deliver first-line parenteral therapy. Methods The survey involved 52 MS nurses in different practice settings in France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA. Nurses described their role in patient education and in treatment decision making. They also rated the importance of nine prespecified attributes of autoinjectors and stated their preference, both overall and by attribute, for one of two autoinjectors used to deliver interferon β-1b (ExtaviPro® 30G and Betacomfort®). Nurses’ preferences were compared with those previously collected from patients using an identical questionnaire. Results There were pronounced differences between practice settings and between countries in the opinions of MS nurses about their influence on treatment decision making. Nurses considered themselves instrumental in helping patients decide between treatment options offered by neurologists. Of the nine autoinjector attributes, nurses rated “reliable to use” as most important, followed by attributes associated with convenience (“easy to operate,” “ergonomic shape,” “reach” [of injection sites], and “one-handed injection”). Nurses’ and patients’ rankings of attributes were closely aligned. For the nine attributes, 74%–98% of nurses preferred ExtaviPro® 30G to Betacomfort®, 94% preferring ExtaviPro® 30G overall. Nurses showed a greater preference than patients for ExtaviPro® 30G with respect to “easy to operate” (92% vs 78%), “intuitive to use” (98% vs 78%), and “attractive design” (98% vs 83%; P<0.05, all), but preference rates were otherwise similar across the two groups. The most common reasons in both groups for preferring ExtaviPro® 30G to Betacomfort® were “easy to use” and “ergonomic shape.” Conclusion MS nurses play a key role in patient guidance and education. Their preferences for ExtaviPro® 30G likely reflect their understanding of the challenges patients face when self-administering treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"53 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/POR.S72012\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S72012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S72012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:本国际调查记录了多发性硬化症(MS)护士对其在治疗决策中的作用以及用于一线静脉外治疗的自体注射器不同属性的重要性的看法。方法对法国、德国、意大利、英国和美国不同执业环境的52名多发性硬化症护士进行调查。护士描述了她们在病人教育和治疗决策中的作用。他们还对自动进样器的9个预先指定属性的重要性进行了评级,并对用于递送干扰素β-1b的两种自动进样器(ExtaviPro®30G和betaccomfort®)中的一种进行了总体和按属性的偏好。护士的偏好与先前使用相同问卷从患者那里收集的偏好进行比较。结果MS护士对其影响治疗决策的看法在不同执业环境和国家之间存在显著差异。护士认为自己在帮助病人在神经科医生提供的治疗方案之间做出决定方面发挥了重要作用。在9个自动注射器属性中,护士认为“使用可靠”是最重要的,其次是与便利性相关的属性(“易于操作”、“符合人体工程学的形状”、“注射部位的范围”和“单手注射”)。护士和病人的属性排名是紧密一致的。对于9个属性,74%-98%的护士更喜欢ExtaviPro®30G而不是betaccomfort®,94%的护士更喜欢ExtaviPro®30G。在“易于操作”(92%对78%)、“使用直观”(98%对78%)和“有吸引力的设计”(98%对83%)方面,护士比患者更偏爱ExtaviPro®30G;P<0.05,均),但两组之间的偏好率相似。两组中选择ExtaviPro®30G而不是betaccomfort®的最常见原因是“易于使用”和“人体工程学形状”。结论多发性硬化症护士在患者指导教育中起着关键作用。他们对ExtaviPro®30G的偏好可能反映了他们对患者在自我管理治疗时面临的挑战的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autoinjector preference in multiple sclerosis and the role of nurses in treatment decisions: results from an international survey in Europe and the USA
Purpose This international survey recorded the opinions of multiple sclerosis (MS) nurses about their role in treatment decision making and about the importance of different attributes of autoinjectors used to deliver first-line parenteral therapy. Methods The survey involved 52 MS nurses in different practice settings in France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA. Nurses described their role in patient education and in treatment decision making. They also rated the importance of nine prespecified attributes of autoinjectors and stated their preference, both overall and by attribute, for one of two autoinjectors used to deliver interferon β-1b (ExtaviPro® 30G and Betacomfort®). Nurses’ preferences were compared with those previously collected from patients using an identical questionnaire. Results There were pronounced differences between practice settings and between countries in the opinions of MS nurses about their influence on treatment decision making. Nurses considered themselves instrumental in helping patients decide between treatment options offered by neurologists. Of the nine autoinjector attributes, nurses rated “reliable to use” as most important, followed by attributes associated with convenience (“easy to operate,” “ergonomic shape,” “reach” [of injection sites], and “one-handed injection”). Nurses’ and patients’ rankings of attributes were closely aligned. For the nine attributes, 74%–98% of nurses preferred ExtaviPro® 30G to Betacomfort®, 94% preferring ExtaviPro® 30G overall. Nurses showed a greater preference than patients for ExtaviPro® 30G with respect to “easy to operate” (92% vs 78%), “intuitive to use” (98% vs 78%), and “attractive design” (98% vs 83%; P<0.05, all), but preference rates were otherwise similar across the two groups. The most common reasons in both groups for preferring ExtaviPro® 30G to Betacomfort® were “easy to use” and “ergonomic shape.” Conclusion MS nurses play a key role in patient guidance and education. Their preferences for ExtaviPro® 30G likely reflect their understanding of the challenges patients face when self-administering treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信