错误信息素养的语言:COVID-19疫苗犹豫态度、行为和看法

Q1 Arts and Humanities
George Lăzăroiu
{"title":"错误信息素养的语言:COVID-19疫苗犹豫态度、行为和看法","authors":"George Lăzăroiu","doi":"10.22381/lpi2020217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the relevance of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions, only limited research has been conducted on this topic. Using and replicating data from AP-NORC, Kaiser Family Foundation, KFF, McKinsey, Medscape, Morning Consult, Patch, Washington Post, W2O, and YouGov, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding whether vaccine hesitancy may subvert endeavors to control COVID-19. The results of a study based on data collected from 5,900 respondents provide support for our research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate.","PeriodicalId":53498,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Language of Misinformation Literacy: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Attitudes, Behaviors, and Perceptions\",\"authors\":\"George Lăzăroiu\",\"doi\":\"10.22381/lpi2020217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the relevance of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions, only limited research has been conducted on this topic. Using and replicating data from AP-NORC, Kaiser Family Foundation, KFF, McKinsey, Medscape, Morning Consult, Patch, Washington Post, W2O, and YouGov, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding whether vaccine hesitancy may subvert endeavors to control COVID-19. The results of a study based on data collected from 5,900 respondents provide support for our research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22381/lpi2020217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/lpi2020217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

尽管COVID-19疫苗犹豫态度、行为和观念具有相关性,但关于这一主题的研究有限。我们使用并复制了AP-NORC、凯撒家庭基金会、KFF、麦肯锡、Medscape、Morning Consult、Patch、华盛顿邮报、W2O和YouGov的数据,对疫苗犹豫是否会破坏控制COVID-19的努力进行了分析和估计。一项基于从5900名受访者收集的数据的研究结果为我们的研究模型提供了支持。在适当情况下,对已完成调查的汇编数据进行了描述性统计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Language of Misinformation Literacy: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Attitudes, Behaviors, and Perceptions
Despite the relevance of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions, only limited research has been conducted on this topic. Using and replicating data from AP-NORC, Kaiser Family Foundation, KFF, McKinsey, Medscape, Morning Consult, Patch, Washington Post, W2O, and YouGov, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding whether vaccine hesitancy may subvert endeavors to control COVID-19. The results of a study based on data collected from 5,900 respondents provide support for our research model. Descriptive statistics of compiled data from the completed surveys were calculated when appropriate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations
Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信