儿童二度烧伤程序性疼痛治疗的镇痛方案

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
A. Komarčević, R. Jokić, M. Pajić, M. Jovanović, M. Milenković
{"title":"儿童二度烧伤程序性疼痛治疗的镇痛方案","authors":"A. Komarčević, R. Jokić, M. Pajić, M. Jovanović, M. Milenković","doi":"10.2298/vsp220305043k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background / Aim. Children with burns are submitted to multiple, painful and anxiety related procedures during wound dressing, treatment, and rehabilitation. The objective of analgesic treatments for procedural pain is the safe and efficient management of pain and emotional stress, which requires a careful, balanced, and systematic approach. The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of analgesic and/or local anestetic on relieving the intensity of procedural pain. Methods. In the study, 120 pediatric patients with second-degree burns were allocated into four groups of 30. During wound dressings, patients in the control group did not receive any analgesics, while in the remaining groups 30 minutes prior to wound dressing, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, local anesthetic, or both were administered. Results. The average visual analog scale (VAS) score in the control group was statistically significantly higher on all tested days in comparison with children in all groups who were treated. On the first test day, all children had high VAS values and the limit was 89.50/100. There was a remarkable difference on the fifth day of dressing with the limit of 57.50/100, and on the seventh day the limit was 43.50/100. Children who experienced the lowest intensity of pain during dressing changes of burn wounds for all test days were those in the group who recieved both systemic analgesic and local anesthetic. Conclusion. The study confirmed the importance of the introduction of complex polymodal protocol in the treatment of procedural pain in second degree burns. The protocol should include analgesics as well as anesthetics since they both contribute in achieving the best results in pain reduction and treatment outcome.","PeriodicalId":23531,"journal":{"name":"Vojnosanitetski pregled","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesic protocol for procedural pain treatment of second degree burns in children\",\"authors\":\"A. Komarčević, R. Jokić, M. Pajić, M. Jovanović, M. Milenković\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/vsp220305043k\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background / Aim. Children with burns are submitted to multiple, painful and anxiety related procedures during wound dressing, treatment, and rehabilitation. The objective of analgesic treatments for procedural pain is the safe and efficient management of pain and emotional stress, which requires a careful, balanced, and systematic approach. The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of analgesic and/or local anestetic on relieving the intensity of procedural pain. Methods. In the study, 120 pediatric patients with second-degree burns were allocated into four groups of 30. During wound dressings, patients in the control group did not receive any analgesics, while in the remaining groups 30 minutes prior to wound dressing, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, local anesthetic, or both were administered. Results. The average visual analog scale (VAS) score in the control group was statistically significantly higher on all tested days in comparison with children in all groups who were treated. On the first test day, all children had high VAS values and the limit was 89.50/100. There was a remarkable difference on the fifth day of dressing with the limit of 57.50/100, and on the seventh day the limit was 43.50/100. Children who experienced the lowest intensity of pain during dressing changes of burn wounds for all test days were those in the group who recieved both systemic analgesic and local anesthetic. Conclusion. The study confirmed the importance of the introduction of complex polymodal protocol in the treatment of procedural pain in second degree burns. The protocol should include analgesics as well as anesthetics since they both contribute in achieving the best results in pain reduction and treatment outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vojnosanitetski pregled\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vojnosanitetski pregled\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/vsp220305043k\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vojnosanitetski pregled","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/vsp220305043k","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的烧伤儿童在伤口敷料、治疗和康复过程中要经历多次痛苦和焦虑相关的程序。程序性疼痛镇痛治疗的目的是安全有效地管理疼痛和情绪压力,这需要一个谨慎、平衡和系统的方法。本研究的目的是确定镇痛药和/或局部麻醉剂对减轻手术疼痛强度的有效性。方法。在这项研究中,120名二度烧伤的儿童患者被分为四组,每组30人。在创面敷料过程中,对照组患者不使用任何镇痛药,其余组在创面敷料前30分钟口服非甾体类抗炎药、局部麻醉剂或两者同时使用。结果。对照组在所有测试日的平均视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分均显著高于治疗组。第1天患儿VAS评分均较高,极限值为89.50/100。第5天差异显著,极限值为57.50/100,第7天极限值为43.50/100。在所有测试日中,在烧伤创面换药期间疼痛强度最低的儿童是同时接受全身镇痛和局部麻醉的儿童。结论。该研究证实了引入复杂多模态方案治疗二度烧伤程序性疼痛的重要性。该方案应包括镇痛药和麻醉剂,因为它们都有助于实现疼痛减轻和治疗结果的最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analgesic protocol for procedural pain treatment of second degree burns in children
Background / Aim. Children with burns are submitted to multiple, painful and anxiety related procedures during wound dressing, treatment, and rehabilitation. The objective of analgesic treatments for procedural pain is the safe and efficient management of pain and emotional stress, which requires a careful, balanced, and systematic approach. The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of analgesic and/or local anestetic on relieving the intensity of procedural pain. Methods. In the study, 120 pediatric patients with second-degree burns were allocated into four groups of 30. During wound dressings, patients in the control group did not receive any analgesics, while in the remaining groups 30 minutes prior to wound dressing, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, local anesthetic, or both were administered. Results. The average visual analog scale (VAS) score in the control group was statistically significantly higher on all tested days in comparison with children in all groups who were treated. On the first test day, all children had high VAS values and the limit was 89.50/100. There was a remarkable difference on the fifth day of dressing with the limit of 57.50/100, and on the seventh day the limit was 43.50/100. Children who experienced the lowest intensity of pain during dressing changes of burn wounds for all test days were those in the group who recieved both systemic analgesic and local anesthetic. Conclusion. The study confirmed the importance of the introduction of complex polymodal protocol in the treatment of procedural pain in second degree burns. The protocol should include analgesics as well as anesthetics since they both contribute in achieving the best results in pain reduction and treatment outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vojnosanitetski pregled
Vojnosanitetski pregled MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vojnosanitetski pregled (VSP) is a leading medical journal of physicians and pharmacists of the Serbian Army. The Journal is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信