植物化学学会作为森林土壤对林业机械驱动敏感度的指标

IF 0.3 Q4 FORESTRY
Gašper Ogrin, Raffaele Spinelli, Natascia Magagnotti, V. Halilović, Matevž Mihelič
{"title":"植物化学学会作为森林土壤对林业机械驱动敏感度的指标","authors":"Gašper Ogrin, Raffaele Spinelli, Natascia Magagnotti, V. Halilović, Matevž Mihelič","doi":"10.20315/ASETL.123.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article we determine the suitability of the phytocenose as a basic unit for determining soil susceptibility to mechanized logging. A total of 90 measurements of skid trail profiles were taken on a 13.9 km long sample transect. The forest infrastructure studied was categorized into primary and secondary skid trails, trails intended for CTL harvesting and undocumented trails. The following indicators were determined on the profiles: tyre track depth, trail width, trail slope, amount of rock present, presence of roots and road category. The deepest ruts were found in Blechno-Fagetum (6.9 cm), followed by Galio rotundifolii-Abietetum (6.4 cm) and Hacquetio-Fagetum (5.6 cm), while the shallowest ruts were found in Omphalodo-Fagetum (5.3 cm). The deepest ruts were found on primary skid trails (7.0 cm), followed by secondary skid trails (5.8 cm), while the shallowest ruts were found on skid trails used by CTL technology and on undocumented trails (1.9 cm). No significant difference in track depth was found between the four individual phytosociological units, but more extensive research should be conducted in the future.","PeriodicalId":7188,"journal":{"name":"Acta Silvae et Ligni","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fitocenološka združba kot kazalnik občutljivosti gozdnih tal za vožnjo gozdarske mehanizacije\",\"authors\":\"Gašper Ogrin, Raffaele Spinelli, Natascia Magagnotti, V. Halilović, Matevž Mihelič\",\"doi\":\"10.20315/ASETL.123.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the article we determine the suitability of the phytocenose as a basic unit for determining soil susceptibility to mechanized logging. A total of 90 measurements of skid trail profiles were taken on a 13.9 km long sample transect. The forest infrastructure studied was categorized into primary and secondary skid trails, trails intended for CTL harvesting and undocumented trails. The following indicators were determined on the profiles: tyre track depth, trail width, trail slope, amount of rock present, presence of roots and road category. The deepest ruts were found in Blechno-Fagetum (6.9 cm), followed by Galio rotundifolii-Abietetum (6.4 cm) and Hacquetio-Fagetum (5.6 cm), while the shallowest ruts were found in Omphalodo-Fagetum (5.3 cm). The deepest ruts were found on primary skid trails (7.0 cm), followed by secondary skid trails (5.8 cm), while the shallowest ruts were found on skid trails used by CTL technology and on undocumented trails (1.9 cm). No significant difference in track depth was found between the four individual phytosociological units, but more extensive research should be conducted in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Silvae et Ligni\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Silvae et Ligni\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20315/ASETL.123.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Silvae et Ligni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20315/ASETL.123.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们确定了植物糖作为确定土壤对机械化采伐易感性的基本单位的适用性。在13.9公里长的样带上共进行了90次滑痕剖面测量。研究的森林基础设施分为初级和次级滑道、用于CTL采伐的滑道和未记录的滑道。在剖面上确定了以下指标:轮胎轨迹深度、轨迹宽度、轨迹坡度、存在岩石量、存在树根和道路类别。其中最深的是Blechno-Fagetum (6.9 cm),其次是Galio rotundifolii-Abietetum (6.4 cm)和Hacquetio-Fagetum (5.6 cm),最浅的是Omphalodo-Fagetum (5.3 cm)。在主要滑轨上发现最深的车辙(7.0 cm),其次是次要滑轨(5.8 cm),而在CTL技术使用的滑轨和未记录的滑轨上发现最浅的车辙(1.9 cm)。4个植物社会学单元间的径迹深度无显著差异,有待进一步深入研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fitocenološka združba kot kazalnik občutljivosti gozdnih tal za vožnjo gozdarske mehanizacije
In the article we determine the suitability of the phytocenose as a basic unit for determining soil susceptibility to mechanized logging. A total of 90 measurements of skid trail profiles were taken on a 13.9 km long sample transect. The forest infrastructure studied was categorized into primary and secondary skid trails, trails intended for CTL harvesting and undocumented trails. The following indicators were determined on the profiles: tyre track depth, trail width, trail slope, amount of rock present, presence of roots and road category. The deepest ruts were found in Blechno-Fagetum (6.9 cm), followed by Galio rotundifolii-Abietetum (6.4 cm) and Hacquetio-Fagetum (5.6 cm), while the shallowest ruts were found in Omphalodo-Fagetum (5.3 cm). The deepest ruts were found on primary skid trails (7.0 cm), followed by secondary skid trails (5.8 cm), while the shallowest ruts were found on skid trails used by CTL technology and on undocumented trails (1.9 cm). No significant difference in track depth was found between the four individual phytosociological units, but more extensive research should be conducted in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
2
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信