“南方下雪了”:如何帮助母亲,避免重复相同/差异的争论

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Joan C. Williams
{"title":"“南方下雪了”:如何帮助母亲,避免重复相同/差异的争论","authors":"Joan C. Williams","doi":"10.2307/1123761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professor Williams argues that by understanding their history feminists can avoid repeating it. The key disagreement in the destructive sameness/difference debate is not over whether women are the same or different from men, but over whether to empower women in their traditional caregiving role (the 'femme strategy'), or to shift them into socially valued masculine gender performances such as melding personal identity with paid work and off-loading care work (the 'tomboy strategy'). Professor Williams argues that, given the profound importance of care work to the identities of the 85% of women who become mothers, and the structural linkage of motherhood and economic inequality, we need to accept as a given that empowering women requires ending the economic marginalization of mothers. She proposes a 'listening tour,' informed by an epistemology that respects all truths as partial, flawed, and situated - all forged in an arena of constraint. The law professor's role is not to pronounce the 'One True Way' but to seek points of respectful coalition among people whose truths differ.","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123761","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'It's Snowing Down South': How to Help Mothers and Avoid Recycling the Sameness/Difference Debate\",\"authors\":\"Joan C. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1123761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professor Williams argues that by understanding their history feminists can avoid repeating it. The key disagreement in the destructive sameness/difference debate is not over whether women are the same or different from men, but over whether to empower women in their traditional caregiving role (the 'femme strategy'), or to shift them into socially valued masculine gender performances such as melding personal identity with paid work and off-loading care work (the 'tomboy strategy'). Professor Williams argues that, given the profound importance of care work to the identities of the 85% of women who become mothers, and the structural linkage of motherhood and economic inequality, we need to accept as a given that empowering women requires ending the economic marginalization of mothers. She proposes a 'listening tour,' informed by an epistemology that respects all truths as partial, flawed, and situated - all forged in an arena of constraint. The law professor's role is not to pronounce the 'One True Way' but to seek points of respectful coalition among people whose truths differ.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Columbia Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1123761\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Columbia Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123761\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1123761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

威廉姆斯教授认为,通过了解他们的历史,女权主义者可以避免重蹈覆辙。在破坏性的相同/差异辩论中,关键的分歧不在于女性与男性是否相同或不同,而在于是否赋予女性传统的照顾角色(“女性策略”),或者将她们转变为社会重视的男性性别表现,例如将个人身份与有偿工作和卸下照顾工作结合起来(“假男策略”)。威廉姆斯教授认为,鉴于护理工作对85%成为母亲的女性身份的深刻重要性,以及母性与经济不平等的结构性联系,我们需要接受这样一个事实,即赋予女性权力需要结束母亲的经济边缘化。她提出了一种“倾听之旅”,通过一种认识论来了解,这种认识论尊重所有的真理,认为它们是部分的、有缺陷的和定位的——所有这些都是在约束的舞台上形成的。法学教授的角色不是宣布“唯一的真理”,而是在真理不同的人之间寻求尊重的联合点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'It's Snowing Down South': How to Help Mothers and Avoid Recycling the Sameness/Difference Debate
Professor Williams argues that by understanding their history feminists can avoid repeating it. The key disagreement in the destructive sameness/difference debate is not over whether women are the same or different from men, but over whether to empower women in their traditional caregiving role (the 'femme strategy'), or to shift them into socially valued masculine gender performances such as melding personal identity with paid work and off-loading care work (the 'tomboy strategy'). Professor Williams argues that, given the profound importance of care work to the identities of the 85% of women who become mothers, and the structural linkage of motherhood and economic inequality, we need to accept as a given that empowering women requires ending the economic marginalization of mothers. She proposes a 'listening tour,' informed by an epistemology that respects all truths as partial, flawed, and situated - all forged in an arena of constraint. The law professor's role is not to pronounce the 'One True Way' but to seek points of respectful coalition among people whose truths differ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Columbia Law Review is one of the world"s leading publications of legal scholarship. Founded in 1901, the Review is an independent nonprofit corporation that produces a law journal edited and published entirely by students at Columbia Law School. It is one of a handful of student-edited law journals in the nation that publish eight issues a year. The Review is the third most widely distributed and cited law review in the country. It receives about 2,000 submissions per year and selects approximately 20-25 manuscripts for publication annually, in addition to student Notes. In 2008, the Review expanded its audience with the launch of Sidebar, an online supplement to the Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信