小卡约·普拉多和塞尔索·费塔多的解释:巴西经济史学的视角

S. Pessoa
{"title":"小卡约·普拉多和塞尔索·费塔多的解释:巴西经济史学的视角","authors":"S. Pessoa","doi":"10.21452/RDE.V1I1.7175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The historical books of Caio Prado Junior and Celso Furtado are indispensable references for understanding the evolution of Brazilian economy. This work seeks to highlight the perspectives of these interpretations, pointing out their divergences and affinities not with regard to the colonial period, political independence and the abolition of servile labor To sum up it was possible to observe the convergence of these authors on the meaning of colonization. However, they differ on the maintenance of this sense in the Brazilian evolution. The consequences of the trade treaty between Portugal and England in 1810 are analyzed differently by the two authors, as well as the first decades after independence. Prado Jr. synthesizes this period under the perspective of contradiction that permeates his work: change with continuity. In turn, Furtado does not deny the limitation imposed on the autonomy of the Portuguese-Brazilian government, but delegates other reasons to the unsatisfactory level of development of the economy. On the slow process of abolishing slavery, the two authors acknowledge that the conditions of the time were not ripe for the immediate abolition of servile labor.","PeriodicalId":32938,"journal":{"name":"RDE Revista de Desenvolvimento Economico","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AS INTERPRETAÇÕES CAIO PRADO JÚNIOR E CELSO FURTADO: A HISTORIOGRAFIA ECONÔMICA BRASILEIRA EM PERSPECTIVA\",\"authors\":\"S. Pessoa\",\"doi\":\"10.21452/RDE.V1I1.7175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The historical books of Caio Prado Junior and Celso Furtado are indispensable references for understanding the evolution of Brazilian economy. This work seeks to highlight the perspectives of these interpretations, pointing out their divergences and affinities not with regard to the colonial period, political independence and the abolition of servile labor To sum up it was possible to observe the convergence of these authors on the meaning of colonization. However, they differ on the maintenance of this sense in the Brazilian evolution. The consequences of the trade treaty between Portugal and England in 1810 are analyzed differently by the two authors, as well as the first decades after independence. Prado Jr. synthesizes this period under the perspective of contradiction that permeates his work: change with continuity. In turn, Furtado does not deny the limitation imposed on the autonomy of the Portuguese-Brazilian government, but delegates other reasons to the unsatisfactory level of development of the economy. On the slow process of abolishing slavery, the two authors acknowledge that the conditions of the time were not ripe for the immediate abolition of servile labor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RDE Revista de Desenvolvimento Economico\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RDE Revista de Desenvolvimento Economico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21452/RDE.V1I1.7175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RDE Revista de Desenvolvimento Economico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21452/RDE.V1I1.7175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Caio Prado Junior和Celso Furtado的历史著作是理解巴西经济演变不可缺少的参考资料。这项工作旨在突出这些解释的观点,指出他们的分歧和相似之处,而不是关于殖民时期,政治独立和废除奴役劳动。总之,有可能观察到这些作者对殖民意义的趋同。然而,他们在巴西进化过程中对这种意义的维持方面存在分歧。两位作者对1810年葡萄牙和英国之间的贸易条约的后果以及独立后的头几十年进行了不同的分析。小普拉多在矛盾的视角下综合了这一时期,这种矛盾渗透到他的作品中:变化与连续性。反过来,费塔多并不否认对葡萄牙-巴西政府自治权的限制,而是将其他原因归咎于经济发展水平不令人满意。关于废除奴隶制的缓慢进程,两位作者承认,当时的条件还不成熟,无法立即废除奴役劳动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AS INTERPRETAÇÕES CAIO PRADO JÚNIOR E CELSO FURTADO: A HISTORIOGRAFIA ECONÔMICA BRASILEIRA EM PERSPECTIVA
The historical books of Caio Prado Junior and Celso Furtado are indispensable references for understanding the evolution of Brazilian economy. This work seeks to highlight the perspectives of these interpretations, pointing out their divergences and affinities not with regard to the colonial period, political independence and the abolition of servile labor To sum up it was possible to observe the convergence of these authors on the meaning of colonization. However, they differ on the maintenance of this sense in the Brazilian evolution. The consequences of the trade treaty between Portugal and England in 1810 are analyzed differently by the two authors, as well as the first decades after independence. Prado Jr. synthesizes this period under the perspective of contradiction that permeates his work: change with continuity. In turn, Furtado does not deny the limitation imposed on the autonomy of the Portuguese-Brazilian government, but delegates other reasons to the unsatisfactory level of development of the economy. On the slow process of abolishing slavery, the two authors acknowledge that the conditions of the time were not ripe for the immediate abolition of servile labor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信