宪政的黑暗未来

Dennis Patterson
{"title":"宪政的黑暗未来","authors":"Dennis Patterson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2580783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay is a review of Alexander Somek’s book \"The Cosmopolitan Constitution\" (OUP, 2014). After summarizing the main argument of the book, the essay pursues two lines of criticism. First, it contends that Somek’s treatment of legal pluralism relies on an insufficiently articulated distinction between law and politics. Second, it maintains that Somek overstates the negative effects of global capitalism on nation-state democracy. The essay concludes that the future of constitutionalism is less dark than Somek would have it, but also – these criticisms notwithstanding – that this is a remarkable book that no one can ignore.","PeriodicalId":81001,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional commentary","volume":"30 1","pages":"667"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dark Future of Constitutionalism\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Patterson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2580783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay is a review of Alexander Somek’s book \\\"The Cosmopolitan Constitution\\\" (OUP, 2014). After summarizing the main argument of the book, the essay pursues two lines of criticism. First, it contends that Somek’s treatment of legal pluralism relies on an insufficiently articulated distinction between law and politics. Second, it maintains that Somek overstates the negative effects of global capitalism on nation-state democracy. The essay concludes that the future of constitutionalism is less dark than Somek would have it, but also – these criticisms notwithstanding – that this is a remarkable book that no one can ignore.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constitutional commentary\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constitutional commentary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2580783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional commentary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2580783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文是对Alexander Somek的著作《世界主义宪法》(The Cosmopolitan Constitution, 2014)的评论。在总结了本书的主要论点之后,这篇文章进行了两条批评路线。首先,它认为,Somek对法律多元化的处理依赖于法律与政治之间没有充分明确的区别。其次,它认为Somek夸大了全球资本主义对民族国家民主的负面影响。这篇文章的结论是,宪政的未来并不像Somek想象的那么黑暗,而且——尽管有这些批评——这是一本没有人可以忽视的非凡的书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Dark Future of Constitutionalism
This essay is a review of Alexander Somek’s book "The Cosmopolitan Constitution" (OUP, 2014). After summarizing the main argument of the book, the essay pursues two lines of criticism. First, it contends that Somek’s treatment of legal pluralism relies on an insufficiently articulated distinction between law and politics. Second, it maintains that Somek overstates the negative effects of global capitalism on nation-state democracy. The essay concludes that the future of constitutionalism is less dark than Somek would have it, but also – these criticisms notwithstanding – that this is a remarkable book that no one can ignore.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信