{"title":"提出一种交易性的民事没收改革方法","authors":"Michael van den Berg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2572022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This student comment provides a new lens through which to understand the controversial practice of Civil Forfeiture. The comment divides forfeited items into Low, Mid, and High Value Chattel (along with Real Property, which is not discussed), and suggests solutions for protecting Low and Mid Value Chattel, while encouraging the pursuit of High Value Chattel forfeiture. Specifically, the comment proposes treating forfeiture as a transaction in the Coasean/Calabresian paradigm, limiting externalities and increasing transaction costs to adjust the \"market\" for forfeiture.","PeriodicalId":48012,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/ssrn.2572022","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposing a Transactional Approach to Civil Forfeiture Reform\",\"authors\":\"Michael van den Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2572022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This student comment provides a new lens through which to understand the controversial practice of Civil Forfeiture. The comment divides forfeited items into Low, Mid, and High Value Chattel (along with Real Property, which is not discussed), and suggests solutions for protecting Low and Mid Value Chattel, while encouraging the pursuit of High Value Chattel forfeiture. Specifically, the comment proposes treating forfeiture as a transaction in the Coasean/Calabresian paradigm, limiting externalities and increasing transaction costs to adjust the \\\"market\\\" for forfeiture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/ssrn.2572022\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2572022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2572022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Proposing a Transactional Approach to Civil Forfeiture Reform
This student comment provides a new lens through which to understand the controversial practice of Civil Forfeiture. The comment divides forfeited items into Low, Mid, and High Value Chattel (along with Real Property, which is not discussed), and suggests solutions for protecting Low and Mid Value Chattel, while encouraging the pursuit of High Value Chattel forfeiture. Specifically, the comment proposes treating forfeiture as a transaction in the Coasean/Calabresian paradigm, limiting externalities and increasing transaction costs to adjust the "market" for forfeiture.