{"title":"咨询仲裁:伊利诺伊州的经验。","authors":"B. Heshizer, H. Graham","doi":"10.2190/PPU5-Y4QY-55YN-CM8R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors reviewed 266 cases of advisory arbitration in Illinois between 1972 and 1975 to determine the issues arbitrated, representations, winners and losers, and whether awards were rejected at the state level. The views of the employee groups using the procedure are also discussed. The authors conclude that the Illinois procedure produces results similar to binding arbitration.","PeriodicalId":80023,"journal":{"name":"Journal of collective negotiations in the public sector","volume":"455 1","pages":"225-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advisory arbitration: the experience in Illinois.\",\"authors\":\"B. Heshizer, H. Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.2190/PPU5-Y4QY-55YN-CM8R\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors reviewed 266 cases of advisory arbitration in Illinois between 1972 and 1975 to determine the issues arbitrated, representations, winners and losers, and whether awards were rejected at the state level. The views of the employee groups using the procedure are also discussed. The authors conclude that the Illinois procedure produces results similar to binding arbitration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of collective negotiations in the public sector\",\"volume\":\"455 1\",\"pages\":\"225-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of collective negotiations in the public sector\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2190/PPU5-Y4QY-55YN-CM8R\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of collective negotiations in the public sector","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/PPU5-Y4QY-55YN-CM8R","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The authors reviewed 266 cases of advisory arbitration in Illinois between 1972 and 1975 to determine the issues arbitrated, representations, winners and losers, and whether awards were rejected at the state level. The views of the employee groups using the procedure are also discussed. The authors conclude that the Illinois procedure produces results similar to binding arbitration.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
