重塑美国最高法院在上诉法院中的形象

IF 1.8 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Duke Law Journal Pub Date : 2009-04-07 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1374449

C. Guthrie, Tracey E. George

{"title":"重塑美国最高法院在上诉法院中的形象","authors":"C. Guthrie, Tracey E. George","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1374449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We argue that Congress should remake the United States Supreme Court in the U.S. courts' of appeals image by increasing the size of the Court's membership, authorizing panel decisionmaking, and retaining an en banc procedure for select cases. In doing so, Congress would expand the Court's capacity to decide cases, facilitating enhanced clarity and consistency in the law as well as heightened monitoring of lower courts and the other branches. Remaking the Court in this way would not only expand the Court's decisionmaking capacity but also improve the Court's composition, competence, and functioning.","PeriodicalId":47625,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law Journal","volume":"58 1","pages":"1439-1475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts' of Appeals Image\",\"authors\":\"C. Guthrie, Tracey E. George\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1374449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We argue that Congress should remake the United States Supreme Court in the U.S. courts' of appeals image by increasing the size of the Court's membership, authorizing panel decisionmaking, and retaining an en banc procedure for select cases. In doing so, Congress would expand the Court's capacity to decide cases, facilitating enhanced clarity and consistency in the law as well as heightened monitoring of lower courts and the other branches. Remaking the Court in this way would not only expand the Court's decisionmaking capacity but also improve the Court's composition, competence, and functioning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Duke Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"1439-1475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Duke Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1374449\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1374449","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

我们认为，国会应该通过增加最高法院成员的规模、授权专家组决策和保留对特定案件的全院程序，重塑美国最高法院在美国法院上诉中的形象。这样做，国会将扩大法院裁决案件的能力，促进法律更加明确和一致，并加强对下级法院和其他分支机构的监督。以这种方式改组法院不仅可以扩大法院的决策能力，而且可以改善法院的组成、权限和运作。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts' of Appeals Image

We argue that Congress should remake the United States Supreme Court in the U.S. courts' of appeals image by increasing the size of the Court's membership, authorizing panel decisionmaking, and retaining an en banc procedure for select cases. In doing so, Congress would expand the Court's capacity to decide cases, facilitating enhanced clarity and consistency in the law as well as heightened monitoring of lower courts and the other branches. Remaking the Court in this way would not only expand the Court's decisionmaking capacity but also improve the Court's composition, competence, and functioning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Duke Law Journal LAW-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The first issue of what was to become the Duke Law Journal was published in March 1951 as the Duke Bar Journal. Created to provide a medium for student expression, the Duke Bar Journal consisted entirely of student-written and student-edited work until 1953, when it began publishing faculty contributions. To reflect the inclusion of faculty scholarship, the Duke Bar Journal became the Duke Law Journal in 1957. In 1969, the Journal published its inaugural Administrative Law Symposium issue, a tradition that continues today. Volume 1 of the Duke Bar Journal spanned two issues and 259 pages. In 1959, the Journal grew to four issues and 649 pages, growing again in 1970 to six issues and 1263 pages. Today, the Duke Law Journal publishes eight issues per volume. Our staff is committed to the purpose set forth in our constitution: to publish legal writing of superior quality. We seek to publish a collection of outstanding scholarship from established legal writers, up-and-coming authors, and our own student editors.